Senate passes bill to expand protection
for Supreme Court justices to their families
Hot Air,
by
Karen Townsend
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
5/10/2022 3:15:23 PM
A bipartisan bill passed in the Senate last night that will provide additional security for Supreme Court justices and their families. The bill passed on a voice vote and was unanimous. This legislation puts the court on the same level as the executive and legislative branches to provide security which includes protection for their families as angry mobs gather outside their homes. The bill moves to the House now.
This is a rare example of unanimous bipartisan cooperation.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
czechlist 5/10/2022 3:28:22 PM (No. 1151565)
why would the Supremes require protection from Godless"peaceful protesters"?
12 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan 5/10/2022 4:06:54 PM (No. 1151590)
The democrats probably hated to vote for this, but it is an election year.
13 people like this.
Farm out the protests to BLM and everything should be good
5 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Birddog 5/10/2022 4:11:49 PM (No. 1151595)
Hunter Biden alone gets over $30,000 a MONTH in SS protection, multiple agents around the clock, renting a $20,000month lux mansion right next door to "Cover" him.
Dozens of americans are currently jailed, and have been for over a year for merely "parading/Demonstrating/Trespassing" in a location where a "SS Protected Individual" was "present", a Nationwide manhunt, replete with rewards/bounties was implemented to track down and find every single one, hundreds of federal agents tasked with tracking, locating and arresting them ALL.(Even though timestamped film/documentation shows that Pence was the ONLY protected individual in/near the location, the order to Limit restrict access was given at 2:02...Pence was removed at 2:04. IE: he was only there for 2 minutes, the charges cannot apply to anyone who was not also there during that 2 minutes, not a single one of whom ever even SAW Pence, nor did he ever so much as see any of them)
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
dwa 5/10/2022 4:18:51 PM (No. 1151598)
This is nothing but show from a worthless Congress. There are plenty of protections in current law -- Just Enforce it! Instead of focusing on getting enforcement of current law, they do a show vote.
10 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rama41 5/10/2022 4:21:16 PM (No. 1151601)
Wouldn't be necessary if Garland weren't a political hack and was just doing his job.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LeeBertie 5/10/2022 4:35:44 PM (No. 1151611)
Maybe I missed it, but I'd swear I saw NOTHING in the original article about Nancy promising to get this bill passed IMMEDIATELY!
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 5/10/2022 4:38:55 PM (No. 1151615)
Irrelevant entirely if the existing laws are not enforced. And they are NOT.
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
udanja99 5/10/2022 6:34:47 PM (No. 1151688)
Hey, demonrats, wouldn’t it have been easier just to call off your rabid dogs?
1 person likes this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Rich323 5/10/2022 7:07:08 PM (No. 1151717)
Seems the multi color Supremacists are more dangerous than any other class. Has Merrick Garland put out a memo warning about this threat to our elected officials?
1 person likes this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 5/10/2022 9:28:15 PM (No. 1151834)
Nutty, Nasty Nancy will not let it come up to vote, and if it magically passed the House, Traitor Joe would veto it.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Beardo"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)