Liberal group calls for protests at conservative
Supreme Court justices' homes
Fox News,
by
Anders Hagstrom |
Original Article
Posted By: Garnet,
5/5/2022 12:43:27 PM
Left-wing activist groups are planning to send protesters to the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices following a leak indicating the court may soon overturn Roe v. Wade.
The activists are organizing under the moniker "Ruth Sent Us" and have published the supposed home addresses of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
"Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights," the group's website reads. "We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics."
Reply 1 - Posted by:
davew 5/5/2022 12:47:17 PM (No. 1147376)
This sounds like an insurrection. Hopefully, the DOJ will treat these people as aggressively as the people their officers took on the guided tour of the Capitol building on Jan 6.
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Trump'sCousin 5/5/2022 12:50:28 PM (No. 1147384)
ABORT ALL DEMONCRAPS!
The Ftards and Kwirdoz will be in large groups. Ya can't reason with evil, you have to eradicate it.
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff 5/5/2022 12:51:48 PM (No. 1147385)
Conservatives should identify libtards staking out the Justices' homes and give them the same treatment. Bet they wouldn't like it much.
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
TXknitter 5/5/2022 1:03:09 PM (No. 1147409)
We cannot continue cowering to this intimidation. It is growing worse and more violent because it is being tolerated. We have allowed Democrats to rule the institutions of our Capitol. What do we do?
21 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 5/5/2022 1:06:25 PM (No. 1147416)
It's starting now. This Supreme court attack is the signal to all hands on deck and gear up for a long hot summer of civil unrest destruction rioting burning looting and anarchy at the hands of Antifa, BLM, and government-planted operatives in preparation for the November elections. It's going to get ugly and Pedo Dumb Joe, Nasty Gay Nancy, and Pedo Fagboy Schumer will encourage all of them to take to the streets and inflict maximum pain and suffering and total destruction.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Krause 5/5/2022 1:10:28 PM (No. 1147423)
Again, we need to review the law regarding agitators on or near your house. If they are causing a disturbance in a residential are, if they are using threatening and/or obscene language, if you or your family feel threatened, if they come on your property, etc. When can you retaliate?
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Right Time 5/5/2022 1:39:00 PM (No. 1147457)
And don't forget to bring along Antifa, Black Bloc, and BLM to the protest.
Stay Classy, Leftards
10 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Rich323 5/5/2022 1:40:27 PM (No. 1147459)
Number 6 come to Florida. We have the Castle Doctrine- when they attack your castle you put ‘em down. Self defense.
14 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Scribelus 5/5/2022 1:55:21 PM (No. 1147482)
Creatures such as these are active between dusk and just before dawn, when they climb aboard their bats and return to Mordor.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 5/5/2022 1:57:55 PM (No. 1147486)
Re #8. INSIDE your castle.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
BarryNo 5/5/2022 2:39:00 PM (No. 1147529)
Seriously. Get some people together and leave them alone if they are peaceful.
If they get violent - shoot 'em.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rich323 5/5/2022 2:40:32 PM (No. 1147532)
RE#10. We have Stand your ground law. Can deploy anytime anywhere you have life threatening attack. See Trayvon Martin - but he’s six feet under now.
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Muguy 5/5/2022 2:42:55 PM (No. 1147536)
Time for intimidation and terrorism at the Justices houses-- except for the ones Nobama put in there who are activists FOR abortion...
It is quite a turn of events for the socials issues are to be off limits for Conservatimes, yet the wacko lib demorat socialist Marxists are encourgaged to go off the deep end on social issues and it is okay and encrouages and fuel put on the fire when they do when it is the libs twho do it with impunity and in yur face crap sandwiches
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
zoidberg 5/5/2022 2:43:13 PM (No. 1147537)
Don't they know that conservatives are likely to be armed?
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Italiano 5/5/2022 2:57:49 PM (No. 1147545)
The left aka the Democrat Party assumes that it owns the streets and the violence option, because historically it has. We've allowed it. Now, with our dysfunctional electoral system and societal breakdown in general in full swing, that is likely to change. When it does....
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 5/5/2022 3:49:17 PM (No. 1147573)
Re #12. OK, now you changed the subject. Yes, stand your ground is fine if attacked with violence. I believe nt it, it is law in my state and will use it if the need ever arises.
However, people shouting and waving signs on your lawn are not life threatening and if you go out of your home armed to engage them, you are almost certainly going to be seen as the aggressor, however unfair that this may seem.
Always avoid confrontations if you can. I would be extremely unhappy if these thugs came on my property, and raised hell, etc. But I would not engage, I would call the police. If they entered my home and threatened violence, I would defend myself and family.
Understanding the real, but narrow circumstances when deadly force is within the self-defense exception is critical. If you shoot and kill someone - it is ALWAYS homicide. The question becomes whether it is within the narrow range of legal self defense. Way too many imagine that to be a far broader scope than it is.
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 5/5/2022 5:12:52 PM (No. 1147624)
It may be a fine line between legitimate protesting and judicial intimidation.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
skacmar 5/5/2022 7:50:42 PM (No. 1147723)
I highly doubt that Ruth Bader Ginsburg would approve of what this group is doing in her name. In fact, while supporting abortion rights, I believe that Ginsburg did not necessarily agree with how the former SC Justices arrived at their decision way back when. Ginsburg may actually have agreed with Alito's opinion returning the decision regarding abortion to the states.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Penney 5/5/2022 8:12:37 PM (No. 1147743)
The dems are now using union thug tactics against the Supremes?! ...It seems like yesterday they tried this out in KC against a park board member and later a candidate for Congress! Are all the dems now common thugs? What happened to R-E-S-P-E-C-T and civility, much less self-control!! ...Brutish mob rule does NOT belong in America! Read the Constitution & Bill of Rights!
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Garnet"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The party of peace. ;)