Revealed: Senate's $1trilllion
infrastructure bill would require
alcohol monitors in all cars to prevent
drunk driving and back seat alerts
to stop hot car child deaths
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Elizabeth Elkind *
Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon,
8/5/2021 12:27:46 PM
With health and safety provisions like alcohol monitors and technology to curb hot car child deaths, the Senate's 2,700-page infrastructure bill details extensive reforms beyond repairs to the country's roads and bridges.
The $1.2 trillion piece of legislation states that 'advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology must be standard equipment in all new passenger motor vehicles,' and that vehicles should be able to 'prevent or limit' operation if a driver is impaired.(Snip) Another section in the $1.2 trillion bill notes that women make up 47 per cent of the workforce, but just 6.6 per cent of truckers.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
TurtleDove 8/5/2021 12:34:29 PM (No. 868964)
If they're going to stop the vehicle from operating while under influence of alcohol, then make it inoperable if the driver has ANY substances in their system; alcohol, pot, prescription & nonprescription drugs, cough medicine, allergy medicine, caffeine, etc. ALL can be considered dangerous when behind the wheel. As for technology to prevent hot car child deaths, here's a radical thought PEOPLE PAY ATTENTION TO SOMETHING BESIDES YOUR FREAKING PHONE & BE MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR CHILDREN!!!!!
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
formerNYer 8/5/2021 12:41:14 PM (No. 868969)
The nanny state getting bigger and bigger and they call the R's fascists - more projections from the democRATs.
22 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Blue Hen1 8/5/2021 12:42:20 PM (No. 868970)
Why should couples that forgo having children have to have this feature in their vehicle? More middle class taxes from Hunters dad
12 people like this.
Another example of a "path paved with good intentions". Americans and their wonderful activist organizations beg for their causes. How is a politician going to face a campaign ad of "(s)he supported drunk drivers by voting against stringent measures to save lives". Even the liquor and tavern interests won't send money.
We have adopted the "even one is too many" standard, except in things that really matter...like one vax-caused death. Then thousands don't matter. Follow the science!
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 8/5/2021 1:03:51 PM (No. 868987)
Insane.
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
cgood 8/5/2021 1:13:01 PM (No. 868992)
How about we restrict funding bills to already approved regulations and projects instead of covering funding, and thus implementation, of policies that cannot pass through voting in the legislature?
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JayD 8/5/2021 1:37:21 PM (No. 869013)
Congress is abusing the people of the US. Anyone supporting this immense overreach of power should be voted out as soon as possible. Supporters of this disgusting legislation obviously has no understanding of the US Constitution, or else despises it. How many members of Congress have broken their oath of office with support of this travesty, just as Resident Biden recently admitted to?
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Rama41 8/5/2021 1:40:31 PM (No. 869017)
Wonder how much that cost the "impaired driver prevention" lobby.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
downnout 8/5/2021 2:01:41 PM (No. 869036)
My SUV is. 2012 with all of 36000 miles on it. Going to keep it forever….
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MEdwards1776 8/5/2021 2:17:23 PM (No. 869049)
Sounds as reasonable as the idea from a local politician who said they should require seatbelts on motorcycles. I ride my Harley they way I want to.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
hershey 8/5/2021 2:24:39 PM (No. 869058)
Ha ha..you always knew it wasn't about infrastructure, unless that included the demon-rats liberal wish list, which apparently it does...alcohol monitors and car seat alarms, what else did the stuff into 2700 pages, oh wait, we have to pass it before we can know what's in it...a pox on all of them!
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
skacmar 8/5/2021 2:26:32 PM (No. 869064)
I do not drink and I do not drive children in my vehicle. Why am I forced to pay to have technology aimed at specific groups (parents & drunks) put in my car when I do not need it. Make all cars more expensive so that the few idiots who leave their kids in the car or drive drunk can't drive or forget the kid? How about enforcing the laws that we have, make parents more responsible for their children, and throw drunk drivers in jail and take away their cars. Congress is full of good intentions. However good intentions are often very expensive and unnecessary.
9 people like this.
We need a sufficient number of fiscal conservatives in Congress who will vote bills like this down simply because they're too big and all-inclusive.
5 people like this.
The average Mercedes now has 95 computers in it! Buy one and wait for a computer problem! $$$$$$$$$$$. Now add 10 more for this idiocy! Fun stuff! Keeping my current car forever!
6 people like this.
Nanny goobermint runs amok.
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MickTurn 8/5/2021 3:09:19 PM (No. 869102)
What we really need are lie detector triggered ejection seats (with NO roof hole) in ALL Electric Vehicles so if Libs tell 1 lie, they get smashed into the ceiling...Ooops, the roof opening was NOT in the legislation...
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 8/5/2021 3:25:48 PM (No. 869124)
Adding to #1’s list…there are plenty of sober elderly people who are now menaces behind the wheel. Of course under the coming communist rule, the government will simply set an arbitrary age limit for operating an automobile even if you are perfectly capable of safe driving. Some bureaucrats will decide that 80 is all you get and hope you have friends and family to get you to your doctor appointments.
4 people like this.
Why is the government paying for electrical charging stations? There should not be one cent of government money going to this. And will all these stations have meters on them so the drivers can pay for their charging? I am so sick of the rich (who are the only ones who can afford an electric vehicle), getting freebies like this.
6 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DVC 8/5/2021 3:45:43 PM (No. 869141)
Gotta stop this bill. 2,700 pages of freedom erasing laws.
8 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl 8/5/2021 4:21:33 PM (No. 869186)
Well, thank God! Now, finally, we won't even have to bother using our brains any more! All that grey matter will become as useful as our appendixes and tonsils.
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Patrick22264 8/5/2021 4:25:25 PM (No. 869192)
So ive got my elecrtric car charged up..was a sunny day thank God..I can try and run from the hurricane/wildfire/riots/floods/blizzard.
etc..Oops..doubled up on that Nyquil..nevamind
2 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
dst4life 8/5/2021 4:27:26 PM (No. 869195)
How convenient. That Deep State can frame an innocent person by manipulating numbers reported by the devices. What could go wrong?
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
mc squared 8/5/2021 4:28:48 PM (No. 869197)
As usual, Socialists make 95% of the population pay because they can't deal with the 5%. Whether it's guns, or alcohol, WE are the compliant majority. For Now!
5 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
or gate 8/5/2021 4:36:50 PM (No. 869209)
Dumb us down more.
Next it will tell who we voted for.
2 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 8/5/2021 5:25:25 PM (No. 869250)
So why do I, a non-drinker, have to pay for this abomination in my car? And how much will it add to the price of a car? Didn't airbags increase the price of a car by over $1,000, and yet still people die in car wrecks.
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 8/5/2021 5:43:16 PM (No. 869264)
I see a big increase in the demand for used cars in the future. I have a 20 year-old SUV and now I don't have to pass a yearly emissions test. It is a keeper. This regulatory junk is written by lobbyists and rubber stamped by the corrupt Congress members.
4 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
YorkieMom 8/5/2021 6:22:13 PM (No. 869295)
The only thing Congress is good at is meddling in our business. Leave us alone.
4 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
DVC 8/5/2021 9:57:24 PM (No. 869525)
Nanny cars, at what cost?
1 person likes this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 8/5/2021 10:19:40 PM (No. 869547)
New computer to stop stupid! Ugh oh! Only 2% of Americans qualify!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ribicon"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
* Geoff Earle, and Katelyn Caralle
Various monitors in cars might be a costly invasion of privacy to little benefit to the rabble, since drunk driving laws already exist, but the members of the US Congress who invested in the technology vendors stand to make a fortune. And at its core, isn't this what America is all about? And thanks to The Great Emancipator, everything under the sun falls under federal purview, so we just have to deal with it.