The Dominion software story keeps
getting worse
American Thinker,
by
Andrea Widburg
Original Article
Posted By: OhioNick,
11/15/2020 4:38:02 PM
Dominion software’s reputation for reliability may have taken another hit with the claim that Eric Coomer, a vice president and dominion, and the person in charge of the software’s security, is an Antifa supporter and Trump hater. This information is disturbing when added to the way in which the software churned out impossible pro-Biden results in the wee hours of November 4 in Democrat-run states following a Trump wave.
Wikipedia has deleted most of Dominion’s history. I visited the page a few days ago and read about its origins in Venezuela.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Urgent Fury 11/15/2020 4:56:04 PM (No. 607005)
Wow. This guy needs dealt with. Doesn't our side have any software geniuses?
17 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 11/15/2020 5:00:11 PM (No. 607006)
Lovely. Nothing like having the fox guard the henhouse.
21 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
davew 11/15/2020 5:03:39 PM (No. 607009)
If it was good enough for Hugo Chavez it should be good enough for Joe Biden. I'm still trying to understand how a vote totaling system can substract and switch votes when it should only have an add function. I've seen this with fermions that have both matter and anti-matter particles. Maybe the machines count both votes and anti-votes for Trump. Maybe Chief Justice John Roberts can explain this stuff.
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 11/15/2020 5:05:42 PM (No. 607010)
FTA:
"Oltman has also gone on the record saying that, at an Antifa meeting he infiltrated, “Eric from Dominion,” allegedly said “Don’t worry about the election. Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that.” This person may not be Eric Coomer, but Oltman seems to be pretty sure that it is the same “Eric.” "
The voting machines were rigged. The software has documented capability to move votes from Candidate A to Candidate B inside the machine, as specified by the persons in charge of the voting machine setup.
This is the "Fraud Capability" feature.....which has absolutely no legitimate place in a voting machine.
Voting machine software should be EXTREMELY simple. VERY little for the software to LEGITIMATELY DO. Read a dot, increment a count. Go to next line, read a dot, increment a count. Just so those non-computer
programmers can see how totally simple this sort of a computer program is.....
In English words, not any computer language, the logic is extremely simple, it would go something like this:
1. Using optical reader, look at vote dot position A of voter dot on line 1 of ballot. Store color
level as Dot A.
2. Using optical reader, look at vote dot position B of voter dot on line 1 of ballot. Store color
level as Dot B
3. If density/color level of Dot A for Candidate A is greater than density/color level of Dot B for Candidate B, Candidate A vote count = Candidate A vote count +1.
4. If density/color level of Dot B for Candidate B is greater than density/color level of Dot A for Candidate A, Candidate B vote count = Candidate B vote count +1.
5. index viewing location to line 2 of ballot.
6. Index Candidate A to Candidate C. Index Candidate B to Candidate D.
7. If line count on ballot is less than maximum ballot line numbers, go to line 1 of this program. If line count on ballot is greater than maximum ballot line munber, eject ballot.
8. end program.
Easy, peasy. ULTRA simple software. It should be open source, which means ANYONE can look at the code to see what it REALLY DOES.
The voting program functional guts should roughly 10 lines of functional code and should have NO CAPABILITIES outside of this ballot reading subroutine to EVER change the values of "Candidate A vote count" variable, or "Candidate B vote count" variable. The ONLY way to change those numbers should be when reading a ballot.
Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Fraud.
Will ANYONE in power actually CARE? Will the fact that the voting machines are really RIGGED be acknowledged and the votes tossed out with those machines? Will the Globalist/Deep State folks even bother to do anything, or just paper over this mess and say, "move along, nothing to see here, these are not the voting machines you are looking for"....
37 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 11/15/2020 5:07:15 PM (No. 607012)
#1, it does NOT take any kind of a 'genius' to write or debug software. A bit of training on the particular language and a logically oriented mind....you are there.
I could do it, I am sure, as could millions of other techie folks.
22 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 11/15/2020 5:09:52 PM (No. 607014)
And there IS a bug in my super simple code. Need to increment the "if statements" to give credits to Candidate C and Candidate D for line 2. And so on for each race (line). Another line or two of code, needed.
Still, super, super simple software.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
bad-hair 11/15/2020 5:17:33 PM (No. 607019)
Software manipulation ??? LMAO It's not a bug, it's a feature.
They didn't even go to the effort of applying a Kalman filter which reads trends, projects the future and adjusts the data to fit.
Good grief. Who is picking these machines ? Oh, the government.
24 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
ScooterTrash 11/15/2020 6:03:34 PM (No. 607032)
I'm a database administrator. It's not called a bug, it's called an undocumented feature.
16 people like this.
What on earth are they programming these voting machines with? From what I remember of my FORTRAN days back in college (mid-70's):
10 READ x
20 IF 0, 80
30 IF trump, 50
40 IF biden, 60
50 trumptotal+1
60 bidentotal+1
70 GO TO 10
80 WRITE trumptotal
90 WRITE bidentotal
95 END
All you code guys can pounce on me, but I hope everyone gets the idea. This isn't rocket surgery.
11 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 11/15/2020 6:06:57 PM (No. 607035)
#8, yes, it is not a bug.... and you miss that it is a DOCUMENTED FEATURE. It is in the printed documentation.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/15/2020 6:12:05 PM (No. 607037)
And more blather...
Look, the basic truth is that we have made voting and accurate counting incredibly complicated. If third-world nations, most with populations much larger than most of our states, can pass world standards with paper, pen and purple thumbs, with zero absentee, provisional or early voting, then so can the USA. Get rid of the damn machines. Nine days of "counting" and we still don't have acceptable counts.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
walcb 11/15/2020 6:12:39 PM (No. 607038)
#4, Americans are too stupid to understand your simple explanation. Can you involve some sex in there somehow?
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
privateer 11/15/2020 6:22:19 PM (No. 607042)
well, actually, in today's political game, knowledge, expertise and integrity are of little value...unless accompanied by ruthless adherence to accepted dogma and willingness to commit endless crimes to achieve total power. A great resume enhancer is the ability to lie---fluently and effortlessly---and with a straight face that makes Suckerberg look like an Animaniac.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bad-hair 11/15/2020 6:24:54 PM (No. 607045)
Sure thing #12
Dominion's software is F T,
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 11/15/2020 6:37:40 PM (No. 607054)
Agreed, #11. The only thing the voting machines do (other than automated fraud) is to speed up counting.
THAT is not necessary if we have a lot of small precincts. The precinct I worked this election had 200 voters show up on election day. Something like 850 registered, many did early voting.
Even if 100% of the 850 showed up, and we had to manually count the ballots after the polls closed, I can't
legitimately see it taking longer than maybe 4 or 5 hours to manually count and tally them, with at least one representative from each political party there to look at and verify each ballot.
If that was the case, we'd close the polls at 7 pm, and finish counting by 11 pm or 12 midnight. That is WAY soon enough for me. And if that is too long, make smaller precincts since the counting is done "in parallel" at each precinct. If we had only 300 ballots, counting shouldn't take more than 3 hours. I think we should be able to do 100 per hour without much trouble.
7 people like this.
And, like #4, there's also an error in my algorithm (#9). Add: 55 GO TO 10
Most junior high-schoolers could successfully code a voting machine and make it foolproof in the process.
6 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee 11/15/2020 6:53:50 PM (No. 607066)
Just read this little tidbit about an addition to Biden’s transition team:
“Dominion Voting Systems subsidiary, Smartmatic USA Board Chairman, is Vice Admiral Peter Neffenger (Ret).
Neffenger currently sits on Joe Biden's transition team!”
14 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
nina584 11/15/2020 7:01:26 PM (No. 607069)
There is a lot more to it.Watch Sunday Futures with Maria Bartiromo for a very clear explanation from Sidney and Giuliani.
10 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Jesse Jenkem 11/15/2020 7:19:00 PM (No. 607081)
How did the Republicans not look into the software BEFORE the election? Can't someone look at the software in the machines now, or have they been already been "Reprogrammed"?
8 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
snapper451 11/15/2020 7:19:02 PM (No. 607082)
How troubling is it when two of the biggest stories of this relatively new century, the Biden corruption and the Democrats stealing the Presidential election of 2020 are being totally ignored by the media in the country? A Democrat candidate, whose corruption is fully exposed, and who was on the "take" from China and former communist countries in Europe. And then, the Democrats steal the election through rigged voting machines. All the evidence is ignored and the mantra of "...there was no fraud..." is repeated in unison across all the major networks and in the papers. What the hell is wrong with these people??????
16 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/15/2020 7:40:33 PM (No. 607093)
Don’t know Jack about code - what I do know is that the fix is in.
10 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
judy 11/15/2020 7:43:27 PM (No. 607098)
Texas tested Dominion & declined due to lack of trust related security threats.
10 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/15/2020 7:46:01 PM (No. 607102)
What’s wrong with them?
They’re liars cheats thieves
They’re socialists Marxists and commies
They’re all registered Democrats
They’re corrupt hypocrites and poor losers
They hard America
They hate us
Does that answer the question?
10 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/15/2020 7:47:21 PM (No. 607104)
**”hate America“
Not “hard”
4 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Muguy 11/15/2020 9:39:58 PM (No. 607151)
#17, Isn't that special! Do tell!
Loads of Pelosi and Biden people all over this!
0 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
mifla 11/16/2020 4:35:06 AM (No. 607267)
Seize a copy of the software and have a comp sci type look at how the Dominion program works.
2 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
hoosierblue 11/16/2020 7:15:41 AM (No. 607340)
Just wait, they will be using the same machines - software in the next election and the rest after that.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "OhioNick"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)