How nuclear power may become
a reality for cities in Utah,
5 other states
Deseret News (SLC Utah),
by
Amy Joi O'Donoghue
Original Article
Posted By: rubberneck,
9/1/2020 3:09:52 PM
Nuclear power providing energy for some cities in Utah and five other states in the West is inching closer to reality after federal regulators endorsed the design of a planned small modular reactor plant at Idaho National Laboratory. (snip) ... the reactors can’t melt down, can’t be hacked and the plant does not have to be shut down to be refueled. The reactors are underground and submerged in an 80-foot pool.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
IowaDad 9/1/2020 4:01:05 PM (No. 528173)
Nuclear power has proven to be the safest, cheapest and most environmentally friendly source of base electricity generation (one that is "on" 24 hours a day) over 50+ years.
If you don't believe me explore our Palo plant, commissioned 1974, and shut down last month after 46 years of success, saving 4 million tons of carbon dioxide emission per year.
7 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
worried 9/1/2020 4:16:21 PM (No. 528183)
Years ago they shut down (took off line) a small nuclear plant in the rural town of Rowe, Mass. 30+ years of operation without a problem, quietly providing electricity for all that time with no carbon emissions. The only reason it was shut down was because it had reached the end of its designed useful life. Think they would replace it? No way!
8 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Avikingman 9/1/2020 4:16:51 PM (No. 528184)
YES!
5 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 9/1/2020 4:30:09 PM (No. 528189)
The whole "saving carbon emmissions" is absolutely factual, but irrelevant, as carbon dioxide is harmless and man-made quantities vanish into the naturally made quantities, man-made being about 4% of natural.
That said, nuclear power is a good idea IF DONE RIGHT. With the extreme ecoloons forcing huge delays and costly design changes, conventional nuclear power has been essentially impossible to get through the intentional roadblocks of the government. Anyone who points to Fukishima as a "nuclear disaster" needs to rethink that a bit. Question: How many people died in the "Fukishima disaster"? None.
How many people were exposed to radiation beyond that level considered safe for an annual dose? None, including the "suicide squad" who stayed on site the whole time.
The real techno problem with current reactor plans is that there is no recycling and reuse of the "spent" fuel from current reactors, almost all light water reactors. This means that we get 1% of the available energy from the nuclear fuel, and then get rid of it......well, we actually DON'T get rid of it, because that is blocked by the ecoloons, too. ALL the spent nuclear fuel is stored (relatively unsafely) in swimming pools at reactor sites. NONE has been put in the huge, finished, multi-billion dollar Nevada storage site due to endless lawsuits and politics.
Let's hope that this system, which sounds interesting, will break the log jam and replace all those ugly, stupid windmills and solar farms.
9 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 9/1/2020 4:38:13 PM (No. 528193)
Looks like a good idea, with limited tech risk. For those who care, a good overview with moderate tech info:
https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/INPRO/df17/IV.5-KenLangdon-NuScale.pdf
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bad-hair 9/1/2020 5:13:56 PM (No. 528221)
De-centralize and protect. Basically this is nuclear submarine technology. Trouble is "The Grid" hates it. Especially the Win and Solar Grid. There is no conceivable reason that individual houses could not generate most of their own energy needs. Sailboats do. That is why we NEED electric cars. Ramp up the power consumption to keep The Gris alive.
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LoneVoice 9/1/2020 5:55:33 PM (No. 528258)
To quote Mr. Potato Head "way to go Idaho!"
Lots of cool stuff happens out here in Idaho, but to most folks we're just the potato state.
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 9/1/2020 6:14:58 PM (No. 528289)
No electric cars. They are polluting nightmares with short range, and very high price tags. The pollution come in the battery manufacturing.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
MickTurn 9/1/2020 9:29:22 PM (No. 528488)
I so LOVE IT when Leftists change the fuel rods with NO protection!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "rubberneck"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
OF COURSE the far-left is opposed to nuclear energy, despite its being carbon-neutral. According to the article, just the government review cost $500 million and 2 million hours of labor... 14 topical reports, 12,000 pages plus 2 million pages of supporting information. (They probably had to build a huge warehouse, just to contain the paperwork.) That's the way our government does things!