State Department finds violations by
38 people in Clinton emails review
Washington Examiner,
by
Dan Chatain
Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect,
10/19/2019 4:14:37 AM
The State Department identified nearly 600 security violations in its now-completed review of email records of dozens of former agency officials and aides to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The investigation, which covered the 33,000 emails Clinton provided for review, found 91 "valid violations" attributable to 38 individuals, some of whom may face disciplinary action. Another 497 violations could not be tied to any specific person.
A nine-page unclassified report was sent to Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is leading the congressional oversight of the security review, in a letter from Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs Mary Elizabeth Taylor dated Oct. 16.
The 36-month inquiry
Reply 1 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 10/19/2019 5:23:51 AM (No. 211538)
The State Department is among the most corrupt agencies in Washington, exceeded in rot only by the spy agencies. By spreading the blame among so many people, State Dept is diluting the scandal, and of course, distracting from the #1 crook, Hillary Clinton, who orchestrated the whole operation.
41 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 10/19/2019 5:37:41 AM (No. 211547)
I say begin the cleaning process. Fire all 38 and then proceed with criminal charges where warrant. You can't just stop at Hillary, there is also John Kerry with pay to play with his step son. The entire Obama administration needs to be put behind bars.
What needs to be looked at very close are the pallets of cash sent to Iran in the middle of the night. My bet is that someone or others got a cut of this money like Obama, Kerry, etc.
38 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
coldoc 10/19/2019 6:14:30 AM (No. 211562)
Now everybody hold out your left hand palm down. Sound of slapping to commence.
8 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
former lurker 10/19/2019 6:20:22 AM (No. 211563)
A sailor snapping a photo of his ship goes to jail. A bureaucrat committing a felony while protecting a Democrat get a slap on the wrist. I despair.
41 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
stablemoney 10/19/2019 7:41:17 AM (No. 211608)
I really don't care about this report. Why? Because the State Dept does not care about this report, and plans to do nothing, not even read it.
17 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
3XALADY 10/19/2019 7:51:58 AM (No. 211617)
These emails must have reached up and slapped one of the State Dept. libs. I cant imagine that this nest of liberal vipers would go looking for wrong doing from a dhim, especially Hilzilla, on their own
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ledbythnose 10/19/2019 8:04:12 AM (No. 211631)
Lets not get too giddy just yet Folks. The report went on the state that tho violations WERE FOUND. There were no findings that indicated they were intentional. Translating to no one will be charged or indicted. My gut tells me this is a trial balloon for the distinguished Barr/ Durham Report to come out. Also stating a long list of grievous felonies. Yet somehow finding no reason to prosecute the Perpetrators. Go back to sleep Folks. The transition in to Tyranny will be as painless as they can make it on you. Rest easy on the chains of your enslavement. The Super Bowl is just right around the corner.
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
udanja99 10/19/2019 8:07:28 AM (No. 211634)
I pray that there’s a canary among the 38.
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
RuckusTom 10/19/2019 8:08:46 AM (No. 211636)
Get ready for the big letdown from all the investigations going on. "Violations" were found. Not broken laws. Just violations.
15 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ginadee 10/19/2019 8:52:41 AM (No. 211688)
A complete joke. So sad.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
JackBurton 10/19/2019 9:00:52 AM (No. 211697)
And?
And?
And?
Isn't there a next step. If one were a lowly sub crew man, one would be arrested, tried, found guilty (there's the evidence) and incarcerated. Seems like 39 people should be getting measured for prison jumpsuits.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
little guy 10/19/2019 9:03:35 AM (No. 211701)
Yet another total waste of taxpayer money. The State Department needs to be cleaned out from top to bottom not just these 38 whomevers. When someone goes to jail then I will be interested. But, I'm not holding my breath.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Quigley 10/19/2019 9:07:31 AM (No. 211708)
Sounds like some wrists might be slapped- someday- and letters placed in the file.
The Swamp’s pay to play survives.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
franq 10/19/2019 9:12:04 AM (No. 211711)
What does the State Department actually do?
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 10/19/2019 10:12:12 AM (No. 211784)
You can't indict people for committing treason simply because they committed treason.
You need a much better reason than that.
7 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Strike3 10/19/2019 10:22:24 AM (No. 211809)
Don't despair at the term. "violations." These snakes are experts at twisting language, like "extremely careless" instead of "criminal." The emails contained information concerning the highest levels of Top Secret classified information. Both Hillary and her 38 Flying Monkeys understand perfectly well what that means and knew that the email was not secure. They can only avoid the noose for so long (as long as the DOJ does its job, which is the real question.)
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 10/19/2019 10:44:11 AM (No. 211841)
They need names to proceed with criminal charges and this report has no names so it is a total white wash.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
little guy 10/19/2019 11:14:24 AM (No. 211880)
Spitting on the sidewalk or throwing a gym wrapper on the train station floor carries bigger penalties then betraying your country. Sad.
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DVC 10/19/2019 11:53:33 AM (No. 211915)
Indict all of them. For minor transgressions, stiff fines, say $10K. For major transgressions, jail time.
Each person in a secure government environment is required to be annually retrained and to annually sign a statement that they HAVE been trained, that they understand the rules that they must abide by and that they understand that CRIMINAL PENALTIES, including large fines and jail time can be applied if they violate the rules. I signed 35 of these things, I know about this.
Fines and jail. Do NOT let this slide.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 10/19/2019 1:30:17 PM (No. 211988)
Proving intent is not only a red herring, it is a false flag and a non-criteria.
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Bohallx 10/19/2019 4:46:22 PM (No. 212057)
Four of the people on that list have to be HILLARY CLINTON, BARRY SOETARO, JOE BIDEN, Marie Louise Yovanovitch
And remember this is only from 33,000 emails, and every individual had been trained to know how to use the government provided email systems, and were all authorized to see highly classified materials, ......
There are well over 200,000 other emails that have yet to be reviewed. I saw a revised count recently that's far higher. Initially the FBI reported the emails on the device recovered in Detroit were mostly duplicates..... yet, no real count had been done. Apparently they weren't duplicates, and the discoveries there are so spectacular no one is willing to talk about them.
The material found in the 33,000 are just fluff. Likely the other emails not being reported on would be considered evidence of espionage.....
So, we'll see. I think they have enough leverage on the 39 people they've already got lined up to find out who the spies were.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
cor-vet 10/19/2019 5:02:40 PM (No. 212071)
But there was no intent to commit a crime, so they'll all skate! Again.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)