Exclusive: Clinton-Appointed Federal Judge
Bars Arizona Officials From Enforcing
New Law To Remove Dead Voters, Nonresidents,
And Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Gateway Pundit,
by
Jordan Conradson
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
9/10/2022 10:20:25 PM
A Clinton-appointed federal Judge blocked a new Arizona election integrity law from being enforced in the upcoming 2022 General Election.
HB2247 is meant to clean the voter rolls and remove registrants who are registered in another state and no longer live in Arizona. The new law would add a statement on voter registration forms, specifying that if a registrant permanently moves to another state after registering in this state, their registration will be canceled.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 9/10/2022 10:35:55 PM (No. 1274185)
No way this survives appeal.
82 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Blackbird 9/10/2022 10:37:14 PM (No. 1274187)
Another Rat who seeks to enable election fraud. These people need to be DESTROYED.
144 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
vhs68 9/10/2022 10:42:23 PM (No. 1274191)
This is indefensible!!!
Democrats ALWAYS CHEAT......
139 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 9/10/2022 10:53:58 PM (No. 1274196)
The Commie is grateful to Cigar Bill
59 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
judy 9/10/2022 10:58:21 PM (No. 1274197)
Come on man…the Dems need dead & illegal voters..
71 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pugetpower 9/10/2022 11:04:53 PM (No. 1274200)
I think at one time, judges were fair, damm smart, and mostly unbiased. Someone who you and your kids could look up to in awe. Now liberal judges are just brain dead pukes.
116 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 9/10/2022 11:06:30 PM (No. 1274201)
The system is totally rigged.
80 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
chance_232 9/10/2022 11:10:13 PM (No. 1274202)
Give me ONE good valid and legal reason that Dead Voters, Nonresidents, And Non-Citizens should remain on the rolls.
I'll wait.......
146 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
TXknitter 9/10/2022 11:15:33 PM (No. 1274204)
We must not only reverse this decision but realize these constant unconstitutional rulings must end. We have Federal Judges who rule according to bias and politics. Yes, many of these bad decisions do not survive appeal. However, there are no proper aggressive moves to remove these crooked Judges from the bench. Folks, it must happen.
82 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan 9/10/2022 11:24:45 PM (No. 1274207)
Used to be judges ruled on the law instead of their political preferences. Now, lefty judges routinely use the bench to further their political agenda because it could never pass a legislature. Their brazen flouting of the law needs to be punished. Perhaps, if the American Bar Assn. were actually reasonable, they could be disbarred, but that, too has been infected with democrat disease.
60 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Aubreyesque 9/10/2022 11:26:08 PM (No. 1274208)
You know, I think the time has come for the states' to individually tell the Federal Government they can pound sound. None of the Federal government is doing a THING to protect its own citizens yet it goes around telling everyone what to do. Time to undo what Lincoln did.
52 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Penney 9/10/2022 11:56:25 PM (No. 1274217)
Talk about in-your-face lawless Judicial arrogance! This guy flaunts it for all to see!
46 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
danu 9/11/2022 12:05:56 AM (No. 1274220)
how is it important election integrity cases-hello az and ak--end up in unscrupulous nincompoop leftwaffe courts ...at the last minute?
32 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
smokincol 9/11/2022 12:24:11 AM (No. 1274225)
How can he do that? - oh, I forgot, he's a demcommie which means he can do anything and it's legal, unlike the rest of us.
Question: will the demise of PIAPS mean the end of the demcommie party?, because they're protecting her with such fervor or could it be that getting her means getting willy, too?, hmmm
18 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
skacmar 9/11/2022 12:46:45 AM (No. 1274234)
Those poor old non citizen POC, people who moved, and dead people. Just because they are constitutionally ineligible to vote does not mean they shouldn't according to this judge. How quickly they forget their oath to uphold the laws and Constitution of the state and USA once appointed. Too bad there is not a three strike rule for judges. Three overturned opinions and you're removed from the bench. This will might improve the quality of some opinions.
39 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
The Remnants 9/11/2022 12:55:35 AM (No. 1274236)
Wonder what state bar exam she passed.
21 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ronniethek 9/11/2022 1:10:53 AM (No. 1274240)
Get this to the Supreme and pray they take it.
33 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
mifla 9/11/2022 3:26:19 AM (No. 1274263)
Dem playbook 101. Find a sympathetic judge and drag thing through the court system for years.
37 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Charlesqx 9/11/2022 4:01:42 AM (No. 1274271)
OK, I'm no Constitutional Scholar, but how does a federal judge have say over a states voting process? How a state conducts its election is up to each state's legislature per the U.S. constitution. Even the SCOTUS refused to hear anything regarding these or similar issues in the last election, if my memory serves me correctly.
I know, Liberals don't follow the constitution, or laws.
I guess I'll never get over how blatantly corrupt liberals can be.
56 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Trigger2 9/11/2022 4:29:05 AM (No. 1274275)
How long did demonrats shop for that idiot judge?
23 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/11/2022 4:49:46 AM (No. 1274282)
There is no other purpose for this corrupt decision other than to open the door to massive cheating in Arizona - AGAIN.
44 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 9/11/2022 6:10:50 AM (No. 1274296)
It is almost hysterical. We now have a political society who are content on winning by all means. They don't seem to care that there campaign has won by whatever means necessary which includes lying, bribing, cheating or whatever. What absolutely astounds me is that people are comfortable with it and that includes voters. Wouldn't you want to know that you won because of your own hard work and effort? Wouldn't you also want to know you won because you did it legitimately? It just boggles a person's mind. Then again, if you belong to the party base that is taking God out of society, anything goes.
18 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 9/11/2022 6:41:58 AM (No. 1274306)
This is so ridiculous that this Judge should be disbarred for playing politics over law.
35 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
LaVallette 9/11/2022 7:00:20 AM (No. 1274320)
Someone please xpalin why a judge like ths one acting compeltley aginst the fundamental principles of representative government and the right to vote should not be immediately "impached" and dsimissed with dishonor with the total acclamation of all Members of Congress. Too many judges have become so poltically motivated that they are knowingly and deliberatley usurping the legisaltive powers and becoming Laws unto themslves. Many even do it knowing fully that any appeal of their decision to a higher court will definitly be successful, in the expectation that the delay in the impelementation of said law, would be beneficial to the interest of the poltical interest/party they support.
15 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 9/11/2022 7:05:14 AM (No. 1274324)
Another black robed Taliban steps up to save the donkey herd...
24 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
DHorne123 9/11/2022 7:41:52 AM (No. 1274340)
All DimoKKKrats, every single one of them…
Delenda Est
Sic Semper Tyrannis
7 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Daisymay 9/11/2022 8:06:26 AM (No. 1274353)
I thought it was up to the STATE to run their Election. Why is a Federal Judge butting in and making up the Rules?
27 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
udanja99 9/11/2022 8:44:14 AM (No. 1274387)
Arizona officials should purge the voter rolls anyway. There is precedent - 0bama kept the Gulf deep water drilling ban in place after a federal judge ruled against it.
15 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Right Time 9/11/2022 8:55:18 AM (No. 1274403)
The judge needs to be an unfortunate victim of a hit and run accident out in the car park.
That’s the only way these corrupt Leftist judges will ever understand that they aren’t gods.
6 people like this.
To No. 12; 'This guy flaunts it for all to see!'
And
No.14; 'How can he do that?'
I hate to point out that the name of the Judge is Susan Bolten
And to No. 28; I'm totally with you. just ignore this partisan hack, and clean the rolls. Make her do something about it.
By the time anything is done, the rolls should be wiped as clean as the evening dishes.
17 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/11/2022 9:15:27 AM (No. 1274425)
Will someone PLEASE impeach these idiot judges who overstep their authority?
11 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Cousair 9/11/2022 9:30:49 AM (No. 1274441)
Maybe its time for "life appointed Judges" to be judged by the number of appeals that are reversed by the Supreme Court. After a set number of reversals {ie 3} premaritally removed from the bench.
7 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Socio 9/11/2022 9:33:08 AM (No. 1274443)
What kind of butt backwards world are we living in when a federal judge can mandate dead people, non-residents and non-citizens say on a States voter roll, essentially mandating election fraud.
The Right needs to take a page out of the Left's playbook and start ignoring judges rulings. AZ should just purge them and let the courts decide legal standing later that is exactly what the Left would do.
9 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Speedypetey 9/11/2022 9:34:17 AM (No. 1274444)
Judicial Watch won in federal court for all the New York City Burroughs to clean up voter rolls that haven't been cleaned for over a decade. So far, only 22 voters have been erased and we all know how many W2's and 1099's have escaped the city. Advise to Arizona, ignore the fascist judge like NYC ignores the constitutional judge.
10 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
red1066 9/11/2022 9:53:34 AM (No. 1274459)
From what I understand, the states have the authority over elections in their own state. How a federal judge could halt a law passed by the state legislature is beyond me. The judge has no authority on an issue like this.
12 people like this.
Since when does any Federal jurisdiction have any grounds to “interpret” a state law affecting elections? I thought that was a states right issue?
10 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Zigrid 9/11/2022 9:58:28 AM (No. 1274465)
President Trump spent years in court undoing the injustices of his presidency...so what's new...back to court and show these anti-Americans how it's done ....never give up...never give in...WE are one country with our precious flag...white and black and hispanics....WE are together for the good of our nation....no one can stop US....not even the swamp....
5 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 9/11/2022 10:07:03 AM (No. 1274474)
This is in your face CORRUPTION! Question is what will the good, decent and righteous politicians/citizens of AZ do to reverse this crooked judge's decision?
11 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
TCloud 9/11/2022 10:28:09 AM (No. 1274495)
Kari Lake would say her hands are tied? Really?
2 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Kate318 9/11/2022 10:35:27 AM (No. 1274503)
Federal judges have no business in state elections. Ignore this decision.
11 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Krause 9/11/2022 10:36:46 AM (No. 1274504)
So, the roll cleaning won’t start until January 1, 2023, meaning this coming mid term election will be the last chance for dead people will vote!
6 people like this.
Reply 42 - Posted by:
marbles 9/11/2022 10:44:46 AM (No. 1274516)
Using " racism " as their shield they intend to continue cheating. The song remains the same.
6 people like this.
Reply 43 - Posted by:
cgood 9/11/2022 10:50:41 AM (No. 1274527)
Apparently, the states do not run their elections.
6 people like this.
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Samsquanch 9/11/2022 11:04:51 AM (No. 1274545)
As Rush used to say, once the Dims figure out how to rig and eventually get rid of elections it's game over.
7 people like this.
Reply 45 - Posted by:
jntsrgn 9/11/2022 11:13:20 AM (No. 1274553)
Arizona should push forward with this anyway. This federal judge has no such power. States regulate their own elections.
9 people like this.
Reply 46 - Posted by:
MDConservative 9/11/2022 11:31:05 AM (No. 1274579)
Of course, we all want honest judges who rule on the basis of the law. Bit whenever judges are appointed confirmation turns into a political sht show, with this one too liberal, that one too conservative, this one's gay and that one is evangelical, and they're all "party hacks".
Government, regardless of which branch, is political. Always has been. We want jurists who see it our way...cuz that's the law. Their way is activism! If they pack the court, we'll pack it more! We get what we pay for, and that's politicians making political decisions and moves.
2 people like this.
Reply 47 - Posted by:
cold porridge 9/11/2022 11:53:02 AM (No. 1274607)
Apparently this Clinton appointed judge Susan Bolton is not well liked in Arizona, as she favors illegal immigrants, was anti Sheriff Arpiao and has a history of not following law, but ruling with her biases.
http://www.therobingroom.com/Judge.aspx?ID=91
3 people like this.
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 9/11/2022 12:24:59 PM (No. 1274628)
The key will be whether the GOP runs ads asking why Democrats fight to keep dead people on the voter rolls.
9 people like this.
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Luke21 9/11/2022 2:18:40 PM (No. 1274704)
All this talk about the way it used to be. Earl Warren started this in the 1950's. The crime wave of the sixties and seventies, serial killers, etc..came about because Warren and his friends refused to enforce the death penalty and appropriate punishments. Back then, Democrats told us if we didn't like the Supreme Court, elect the right presidents. When we did, the Republicans often nominated losers and the Democrats fought the good nominees in the senate. The judges have always been a problem throughout my long life.
3 people like this.
As always, #46, you know all and make sure we know that you know all. 'Twould be nice if occasionally you offered possible solutions.
3 people like this.
Reply 51 - Posted by:
Hazymac 9/11/2022 3:16:43 PM (No. 1274762)
Judges can be impeached, and, possibly, removed. De-robed, so to speak. No longer "Yer Honner."
1 person likes this.
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Omen55 9/11/2022 3:22:47 PM (No. 1274769)
Appeal & overturn this dem judge.
2 people like this.
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Kafka2 9/11/2022 6:01:09 PM (No. 1274887)
If you don't allow Dead Voters, Nonresidents, and Illegals to vote, how are Democrats going to win elections?
2 people like this.
Reply 54 - Posted by:
garyhope 9/11/2022 6:26:14 PM (No. 1274912)
You can't say what you really think anymore lest that you,....never mind.
Is everything you say, write or think any more read and scanned by giant computers in the sky or in big dark buildings. Does somebody know who you are and where you live?
0 people like this.
Reply 55 - Posted by:
garyhope 9/11/2022 6:57:30 PM (No. 1274926)
"5. If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge's bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgement. "
0 people like this.
Reply 56 - Posted by:
Penney 9/11/2022 7:06:03 PM (No. 1274928)
This court decision certainly favors allowing potential illegal votes?! ...The Administration also allows unvetted illegal aliens to flood into this country, judges release convicted thieves & killers back into the public and some want to defund the police! Who knows that all those in authority will do next to curtail law and order in America?!
....Meanwhile, the evening news hardly acknowledged 9/11 on TV. The dems' media is busy selecting & spoon-feeding their script. Sigh
0 people like this.
Reply 57 - Posted by:
janjan 9/11/2022 9:05:46 PM (No. 1274999)
We judge shop and find the ones who will decide based on their political leanings. Both sides do it. Then they try to tell us that the DOJ is not political. This is a blatant provable lie.
1 person likes this.