New Hampshire Auditors Find Problem:
Scan Counted 28 Percent of Test Ballots
for GOP Candidates
Epoch Times,
by
Jack Phillips
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
5/24/2021 6:10:50 PM
Auditors who are examining votes in Windham, New Hampshire, may have discovered why initial results showed a discrepancy in the vote count for a Democrat candidate.
Republicans in Windham, New Hampshire won all four seats in the legislative election on Nov. 3, but a Democrat candidate, Kristi St. Lauren, requested a recount, which was granted because she lost by just 24 votes.
However, during a hand recount, it was revealed that she didn’t lose by 24 votes. Instead, the effort revealed that the GOP candidates had actually received 300 additional votes, while St. Laurent lost 99 votes.
(Snip) Now, the auditors involved in the process have said that they may have discovered the
Reply 1 - Posted by:
halfnorsk 5/24/2021 6:15:51 PM (No. 795667)
Is it any wonder that the Left usually resists serious and thorough vote audits?
30 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 5/24/2021 6:22:00 PM (No. 795674)
Keystone cops. Election was November 3. Investigation is not completed.
Does anyone remember ANY voting machine computer error that resulted in reducing votes for any Democrat? Anywhere? Any place?
41 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
volksford 5/24/2021 6:23:26 PM (No. 795676)
I would bet my bottom dollar we haven't had a honest election in years. It's four thousand votes ..get a damn judge a new election and paper ballots !
44 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
chance_232 5/24/2021 6:29:22 PM (No. 795681)
Is this a bug or a feature? Had St. Laurent picked up 25 "extra" votes in the first ballot count, she would have declared victory and been sworn in.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 5/24/2021 6:31:46 PM (No. 795682)
Hard proof of crooked vote scanning machines. This won't be any sort of "a software bug", it is a FEATURE, carefully programmed into the software.
24 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Corndoggies 5/24/2021 6:41:12 PM (No. 795690)
We had hanging chads, now folds. We are the smartest people in the world, but can’t figure out voting? We must demand an error free voting method.
19 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 5/24/2021 6:50:00 PM (No. 795696)
I read the article, and I must confess: I couldn’t follow it.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
rockeysroomie 5/24/2021 6:59:39 PM (No. 795705)
We can go to the moon, but we can't count votes accurately. As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us".
13 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
davew 5/24/2021 6:59:55 PM (No. 795706)
What's amazing about all the detected machine errors is that they all subtract votes from Republicans and add votes to Democrats. You would think random errors would fall both ways but it never happens. Coincidence?
Remember these machines were allegedly certified by government auditors based on testing and repeatable results. At what point do honest people lose all confidence in the whole process and just ask for a do-over with no mail-in ballots and hand marked ballots at real polling places?
21 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 5/24/2021 7:14:42 PM (No. 795714)
Scrap the voting machines and do all counting by hand.
19 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
LeeBertie 5/24/2021 7:46:24 PM (No. 795734)
Is there some level of "KARMA" at play here?
A DIM fusses about losing by 24 votes, gets a hand recount, learns her GOP opponent GAINED 300 votes and she lost 99 votes due to "a discrepancy in the vote count".
The vote stealing can of worms got pried open by a DIM?
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
MickTurn 5/24/2021 7:53:18 PM (No. 795746)
Machines should work, people should THINK.
Voting Machines of all types should WORK at digging their OWN GRAVES!
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Geoman 5/24/2021 8:00:21 PM (No. 795756)
While there are spot audits going on in a few states and while the focus is on the "battleground" states, what is being overlooked is that in reliably red states, like Texas and Florida, the final tally, in my opinion, was significantly higher for democrats. In other words, the cheating on behalf of democrats was more widespread and was not restricted to certain brands of voting machines. If the entire election results throughout the US were audited by objective methods, it would likely find that if the will of the legal voters was properly tabulated, then the presidency and both chambers of Congress would be firmly in republican control and the margins would have provided that all-important "mandate."
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 5/24/2021 8:15:07 PM (No. 795771)
Are we in Denmark yet? I smell something rotten.
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Peach1 5/24/2021 8:15:08 PM (No. 795772)
#3 I agree.
I’m in Colorado & I’m beginning to think that our state DID NOT turn blue “naturally”. I think we’ve had fraudulent elections for at least the past 10 years.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Rama41 5/24/2021 8:21:22 PM (No. 795774)
Democrats will have to revise HB1/SB1 to include the following: "Losing candidates shall not claim a ballot miscount without strict approval of auditors selected by the Democrat precinct chairman".
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Omen55 5/24/2021 10:40:05 PM (No. 795863)
The deeper they dig the larger the cesspool.
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
walcb 5/24/2021 11:37:17 PM (No. 795891)
Hand count all votes? Yes brilliant! I can just see how 100,000 dimocrats counting votes will be so much better.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Trigger2 5/25/2021 12:47:44 AM (No. 795932)
Yep, tell me again that there was no fraud. I want to laugh again.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)