Why We Can’t Trust Anything
‘The Science’ Says Any More
The Federalist,
by
Joy Pullman
Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect,
7/11/2020 5:00:16 AM
Despite standing behind their data and method used to conclude there is “no evidence of anti-Black [sic] or anti-Hispanic disparities across [fatal police] shootings,” a study’s authors want to retract their work because it contradicts left-wing politics.
“Although our data and statistical approach were valid to estimate the question we actually tested (the race of civilians fatally shot by police), given continued misuse of the article (e.g., MacDonald, 2020) we felt the right decision was to retract the article,” Michigan State University’s Joseph Cesario and the University of Maryland at College Park’s David Johnson wrote in their retraction request, according to the blog Retraction Watch.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
franq 7/11/2020 7:23:36 AM (No. 474336)
All "science" means to a liberal is: "Shut up. You are a conservative and you must change your mind and agree with me."
10 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
poliposter 7/11/2020 7:31:35 AM (No. 474343)
Some very interesting anecdotes in this article that I had never heard before. I used the think that people who don't like Big Pharma are nuts, but not after reading this.
5 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Muguy 7/11/2020 8:19:32 AM (No. 474395)
This is a great article showing how liberals try to take both sides of an issue irregardless of facts or truth--
It shows how "science" and "facts" don't always agree but whatever definition they want to use somehow justifies one not ruling out the other.
The root word of "science" is the Latin scientia which means "to know", if we "Lmpw" the facts, it is somehow NOT the TRUTH-- right before our very eyes and minds!
fta" "Science says don’t wear a mask. Except that you absolutely should wear a mask....Science says gathering in groups will spread coronavirus. Except if those groups are thousands of anti-America protesters crowding together on hot streets....Oh, wait, yes, that actually does spread the disease. And so does attending church. But not going to the grocery store. While going to the beach is dangerous. Except being outside is actually about the safest place you can be."
7 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mizzmac 7/11/2020 8:41:51 AM (No. 474421)
In other words, we renounce the truth (aka "the science") because the thugs won't like it and we're afraid of them.
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
BarryNo 7/11/2020 9:09:30 AM (No. 474454)
Science always bows to money.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/11/2020 9:10:31 AM (No. 474456)
A lot of organizations did what they felt was the right thing to do in the past month or so and they are all going to pay a heavy price for it. You have your no-go list and I have mine. The "woke" are in for a huge surprise.
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
gop_guys 7/11/2020 9:33:08 AM (No. 474485)
“Don’t push your junk science on me bro!” My sentiments exactly. Watched a couple hours of our mayor here in Austin and his illustrious commissions on a zoom call. Mandated a $2,000 Fine for not wearing.a face diaper in public. Chose not to lock the city down for another 35 days. They trotted out our interim “top doctor” the media likes to call him. (his expertise is emergency room medicine) He had charts for all the new cases and new hospitalizations but no chart on the flattened death rate. Oh, and our doctors and nurses are greatly fatigued. That would be the lucky ones left after massive layoffs. Joy Pullman is spot on with this article! Headed to Amazon to support her by buying books!
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
red1066 7/11/2020 10:12:07 AM (No. 474554)
This is science fault, or more directly, the talking heads of science. It's been this way for quite some time. The current BS virus scam is just the latest and most blatant example of the so called science experts who think their gods. Instead of coming out and saying from the start, "We don't know", or " We don't have enough information yet to make an educated guess". They came out like they knew all the answers to everything. I see this mind set in surgeons everyday. Surgeons know everything about everything. Doesn't matter what the subject is, they know all the answers, and no one can change their minds or add anything to the discussion. Trump had to follow these so called experts advise, because what other option did he have? The experts said," Shut down the economy and schools". So Trump took the advise of these so called experts who at the time didn't know squat, and suggested doing that. The only good thing is that Trump didn't go it alone, but told each governor to make the call based on their states situation. Now anyone can see what happens when one relies on the so called experts who view themselves as the almighty owners of knowledge.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bpl40 7/11/2020 10:28:18 AM (No. 474587)
What about the biggest scam of all - Climate Change?
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
StrikingViking 7/11/2020 10:29:59 AM (No. 474590)
They want to deep-six the facts. They are following Dementia Joe's guidance for the Left:
"We choose Truth over the Facts." The Left believes it is in sole possession of the Truth and it can't be bothered by Inconvenient Facts.
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 7/11/2020 11:39:12 AM (No. 474693)
This has been true for a couple of decades, starting when 'science' started hustling for dollars to fund their research programs, and became willing to cook the results to get those dollars. Modern 'science' stinks right now, thanks to all the Leftist dogma that has infested/infected their profession.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 7/11/2020 11:55:47 AM (No. 474734)
"Shut Up, they explained."
That's their "science."
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 7/11/2020 12:05:27 PM (No. 474743)
They do a study, the left doesn't like them reporting the truth, so they are bludgeoned into 'retracting the study'.
FTA:
"Research also has found that black officers shoot black suspects at the same rate white officers do, and that police are if anything more reluctant to shoot nonwhites. The latter is the main conclusion of the study Cesario and Johnson want to retract due not to scientific error but to politics."
The leftist really hate it when the truth gets out into public and puts lie to their false claims.
The whole "white cops killing unarmed blacks problem" is a fraud. There is no difference in the rates of killing related to the officer's race.
Fraud.
Political fraud.
Intentional political fraud.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)