Post New Article

First female set to qualify
as an Army Green Beret

Original Article

Posted By: SurferLad, 2/27/2020 12:52:34 PM

The U.S. military is about to experience another first: Barring injury in the next few weeks, an enlisted soldier is about to become the first female Green Beret in Army history. That comes seven years after the Pentagon lifted its longtime ban on women serving in combat roles. As with all special operators, the military does not release names or identification. But the woman is expected to graduate soon from the rugged, roughly year-long qualification course and become a Special Forces engineer sergeant. Another woman is also making her way through the demanding yearlong course. The length of the course depends on the operator’s specialty

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Mushroom 2/27/2020 1:10:08 PM (No. 331312)
May she serve honorably for many years!
6 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: KatieJo 2/27/2020 1:10:13 PM (No. 331313)
They better not lower the standards because she's a woman. If she can lug around over 100 pounds of equipment and also be able to carry a fellow Green Beret...I'd like to meet this chick! I have been weight training and doing cardio for over 35 years, pretty intensely in my younger years. At no point would I have ever considered trying such a thing and I don't generally like admitting I can't do things. I was told early on that "girls can't do dips". I ended up doing dips with a 45 pound plate strapped to my waist. It was fun watching the expression on people's faces. But this, no chance, and I don't mind admitting that I could never have done what these guys do no matter how hard I trained.
23 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Gruntmedic 2/27/2020 1:10:22 PM (No. 331314)
They had drop physical standard s for her to make it.
23 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: DVC 2/27/2020 1:24:59 PM (No. 331326)
If she can honestly, fairly and with no reduction in the requirement, meet their requirements, I will support her. But, FTA "Each operator must be capable of carrying another over rugged terrain under fire and doubts persisted that even an extremely capable and fit female would be able to save a wounded colleague. The number of women who can pick up a 180-220 lb person and carry them any significant distance is extremely small, perhaps 1/10th of one percent, if that. Again, if she meets the standards, FAIRLY. I support it. I worry that the military is so compromised that the tests will be jiggered to make it "fair for her" rather than fair to those other team members around her.
16 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: DVC 2/27/2020 1:35:37 PM (No. 331335)
https://norskk.com/warfare/2019/1/24/green-berets-lowering-standards-for-women Long read, but in the last couple of years, the standards HAVE been lowered to accommodate women. THIA IS WRONG.
19 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: DVC 2/27/2020 1:42:37 PM (No. 331347)
Here is the man responsible. Major General Sonntag. Obama general, forced to retire under Trump in 2019, after doing a lot of damage to the Green Berets. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/03/sources-army-general-retaliated-green-berets-forced-retire/ https://militarycorruption.com/sonntag-standards/ Apparently, they have not put the standards back where they were.
11 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Vaquero45 2/27/2020 1:46:28 PM (No. 331354)
If she somehow makes it through the training, the Army brass will destroy ALL the records pertaining to her performance in training. That's what happened with all the women who were given a Ranger tab.
10 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Toby Ten Bears 2/27/2020 1:57:54 PM (No. 331370)
Oh great... Are they 100% SURE it's a REAL woman... or is it one of those "New and Improved" gals that seem to be the latest fad from the kooks.
8 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Pnstrpilot 2/27/2020 2:05:29 PM (No. 331379)
Can you say Kara Hultgreen?
4 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Urgent Fury 2/27/2020 2:36:23 PM (No. 331403)
The Germans, even with the Allies and the Russkies closing in, did not allow women in combat. Of course they didn't have women in government leadership positions.
4 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: lakerman1 2/27/2020 2:55:21 PM (No. 331411)
i have a vague recollection of the Navy being under pressure to have a female carrier pilot. they produced one, over the objections of their flight instructors, and she missed her landing and died. how long ago was that? Some things never change.
6 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: BigGeorgeTX 2/27/2020 3:14:09 PM (No. 331423)
If she legitimately qualified under the same standards a the men, more power to her. But I get the sneaking suspicion she was coddled along the way in order to make feminist history.
8 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: RuckusTom 2/27/2020 3:38:16 PM (No. 331437)
I like how they put "barring injury" right up front.
4 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: rubberneck 2/27/2020 4:08:15 PM (No. 331460)
My thinking was along the same lines as #8. What's a "female" any more? We now live in a world where "settled biological science" has been scrambled and upended. Was this candidate BORN a female? Or has she become a female sometime between then and when she decided that Green Beret U. was for her? (Will the next "Rambo" or Chuck Norris movie have a "female" lead?)
2 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: DVC 2/27/2020 4:12:05 PM (No. 331464)
#12, Kara Hultgren. She failed to "carqual" - carrier qualify, meaning being able to safely and consistently land on a tiny piece of a ship's deck with a fixed wing aircraft. The USN was under tremendous political pressure (largely Patsy Schroeder, Congresswoman from Colorado, I believe). I had two relative in the USN as a naval aviators at the time. This was when Clinton was President, so you can bet that Hellary was reading somebody the riot act about "get women in there". Hultgren was given a second chance at carrier qualifying, an unheard of situation for a male, and the folks judging her were told in advance "she WILL qualify", regardless of actual flying skills. Of course, she qualified, and wound up flying F-14s. A close relative was an F-14 pilot, then USN test pilot, now a civilian test pilot. A few months after getting into a combat squadron, Hultgren had an engine problem, had to shut one of her two engines down in her F-14 fighter. During the single engine carrier landing, normally not particularly difficult, but less forgiving of even small errors since there is half the power available to correct for errors and sudden power changes cause yawing (due to the thrust being asymmetric with only one engine). My F-14 driver relative says "not trivial, but also no big deal if you are any good" about single engine carrier landings. Hultgren got it wrong, the aircraft departed controlled flight just short of the rear of the carrier, rolling inverted. Ejection was initiated, but the back seater has to go first, and the pilot ejection is delayed by a tiny fraction of a second. The back seater barely got out, Hultgren's ejection seat fired as the aircraft reached inverted, only 60 ft off the water, unsurvivable. When asked what happened to Hultgren, at that time, my F-14 pilot relative said simply, "She was murdered by Patsy Schroeder." Hultgren did not have the skills needed, had shown that in the first carrier qualification attempt, and apparently afterwards, too. But political pressure got her into a place where she could not cut it in a relatively standard emergency and that lack of capability caused her death. Are there women capable of being naval aviators, absolutely, YES, without question. I am related to a female naval aviator who served for for years, highly rated, instructor and then a long airline pilot career, now retired. But don't force women or other minorities where they do not earn the position against the same standards as everyone else. General Sonntag, in charge of special ops, lowering the standards to get into the Green Berets was a VERY bad thing, and now we have both men and possibly a woman who are not "the best" because the standards have been lowered. And that WILL lower their performance in combat, and people WILL die because of it.
7 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: PCMM 2/27/2020 4:53:28 PM (No. 331487)
One of my favorite things at the gym (a 24HR gym in Orlando area) is being around some strong, beautiful, amazing women. The ferocity required to be Spec Ops is something beyond just power and stamina. This is a farce and the guys will handle this one. No need to be upset over some silly PC garbage.
1 person likes this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: curious1 2/27/2020 4:56:32 PM (No. 331488)
I seriously doubt she could meet the standards before the obola-bots in the military lowered the standards. Lowering standards that were in place for a long time because it represented what could keep you alive in real-world combat, but was too hard for some to meet, is betraying the personnel serving under you.
5 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: pensom2 2/27/2020 5:24:10 PM (No. 331505)
Big deal. "Female" is a flexible term nowadays.
1 person likes this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: anniebc 2/27/2020 7:32:31 PM (No. 331604)
Haven't girls learned enough about trying to do everything boys can do now that boys are doing what girls do and beating them like snot? Good grief! Let these men do their thing, for freakin' sake. It's the same-o same-o. She qualifies, becomes a GB, and all them men she serves with have to change their way of doing things to accommodate her. Stop the madness.
5 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: melman 2/27/2020 8:45:17 PM (No. 331631)
Didn't they find recently the RNgers had fudges requirements for females? I have no problem with female s asong as standards aren't relaxed. Lives may depend on it.
1 person likes this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: chumley 2/27/2020 9:16:14 PM (No. 331646)
During my entire career they fudged standards for girls. It was so commonplace it wasn't even noticed. It better not have been, because anyone who did was sent to special sensitivity classes.
3 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: enemyofthestate 2/27/2020 9:19:33 PM (No. 331649)
Upper body strength, folks. Females do not have it. A lot of males do not have it either. Fact of life. Get over it.
3 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: red1066 2/27/2020 11:50:10 PM (No. 331715)
After a few years and every female recruit failing, the higher ups felt pressure to get at least one of them to pass the test. So they either lowered the requirements, or just turned a blind eye and ordered someone to pass a female. Any female.
1 person likes this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: hoosierblue 2/28/2020 8:01:29 AM (No. 331862)
Still a bad idea. Biological needs different making deployment more difficult. Also, no matter how able the female is, males will still tend to protect females more that other males making more problems in the field.
2 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: bighambone 2/28/2020 10:37:34 AM (No. 331971)
It’s great that this lady put in the extreme effort to make it through Special Forces training. The problem is that she is a huge exception because of her personal abilities and effort, as common sense will tell you there are very few women in the Army who can carry a 100 lb. pack, a personal weapon, and then on top of that carry a wounded Special Forces soldier any distance as apparently required by current standards.
1 person likes this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "SurferLad"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by SurferLad"
How your Washington news gets distorted
by media priorities
1 reply
Posted by SurferLad 2/22/2021 9:14:07 PM Post Reply
You may not see much news coverage on the world’s 100,000 airplane flights that land safely every day. Let one of them crash, however, and you’ll see smoldering wreckage and sobbing relatives for 24 hours. It’s the same in news coverage of U.S. politics. Now for the first time in memory a research team has examined thousands of news interview transcripts and documented what might seem an obvious but very important conclusion: Extreme views and words by far get the most attention, air time and views online.People who speak
Trump emerges from political silence, as a
GOP gov says no to another Trump term
13 replies
Posted by SurferLad 2/22/2021 8:42:43 PM Post Reply
It’s not exactly earthshaking. But it is politically revealing. On Sunday, Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he will not support a Donald Trump reelection bid in 2024. [Snip] Next Sunday the former president will make his first public appearance and speech since leaving the White House at the annual CPAC conference of conservatives
Trump may have lost to Biden, but Democrats
don’t have much to celebrate
14 replies
Posted by SurferLad 11/10/2020 9:28:41 AM Post Reply
True to its unpredictable form, 2020’s Election Day became Election Night and then Election Week and likely Election Month. Maybe more. [Snip] Barring some major surprise and given the small changes that vote recounts historically provide, it seems likely that Joe Biden will officially become president-elect later this month around the birthday that will make him at 78 the oldest man ever to become president of these United States. But what does that really mean? News flash for euphoric Biden supporters: much less than meets the eye
Us vs. Them: Presidential elections have long
created deep divisions in our country
11 replies
Posted by SurferLad 11/3/2020 8:00:27 AM Post Reply
American elections, especially presidential ones, are specifically designed to create deep divisions across society, camps labeled Us and Them. You may have noticed this in the tumultuous 2016 upset shockwave that has endured ever since. In this cycle, the election featured two dozen Democrats and a lone Republican who out-talked and out-tweeted them all. In terms of the work put into campaigning, this cycle has been no contest. The 74-year-old Donald Trump has campaigned basically nonstop since the convention in late August. [Snip] His challenger, 77-year-old Joe Biden, on some days might campaign as late as 9 or 10 in the morning
Only one long week left in the election
struggle for control — of the Senate
10 replies
Posted by SurferLad 10/27/2020 8:14:35 AM Post Reply
While national attention is riveted by the presidential horse race, a more important contest — or series of contests — is unfolding for control of the Senate. No matter who occupies the Oval Office, the political majority that runs the Senate will play the decisive political role for at least the next two years, perhaps longer. In what is shaping up as a difficult year for Republicans
Which candidate is working harder to win the
White House? It's not even close
10 replies
Posted by SurferLad 10/20/2020 6:06:12 AM Post Reply
To put it mildly, 2020 has been one weird year. And these presidential campaigns are no exception. A most striking difference in the current presidential campaigns of President Donald Trump and Joe Biden is the stark contrast in the efforts put forth by these two men in their 70s. [Snip] Some suspect Biden is no longer up to the truly grinding schedule of a real presidential campaign. If that’s the case, is he honestly up to real presidential pressures? The ex-vice president is certainly playing the political version of football’s prevent defense
Next US president will be oldest in history. Why
do voters keep electing aging leaders?
27 replies
Posted by SurferLad 10/13/2020 2:45:44 PM Post Reply
Americans cannot agree on much these days, but one source of unanimity is that aging is better than the alternative. However, one of the most striking yet less-noticed facts of contemporary politics is that Americans have also shown a striking affinity for selecting — and keeping — old people in political office. Really old people. [Snip] The median age of all Americans is 38.2 years, less than half Joe Biden’s. The coincidental advanced ages of the nation’s current political leaders have raised all kinds of serious new questions, including ideological rigidity, stale policies and mental and physical
In an October filled with surprises,
can President Trump still win?
15 replies
Posted by SurferLad 10/6/2020 6:43:28 AM Post Reply
It didn’t take long for this election’s first official October surprise to occur. Less than 22 hours into the new month, President Donald Trump tweeted that he and his wife, Melania, had tested positive for COVID-19. [Snip] Before that came a videotape with former Vice President Joe Biden appearing to call members of the military “stupid bastards.” And you can pretty much count on more such attempts to influence the November presidential election’s outcome, although the sources will likely be masked to make verification
Remember Kamala Harris? Now, she’s
center stage for the Supreme Court fight
21 replies
Posted by SurferLad 9/29/2020 6:28:46 AM Post Reply
Now’s her chance. When Kamala Harris was chosen as Joe Biden’s running mate back in August, she was portrayed as a younger pioneering partner who would bring new energy and followers to the 2020 Democratic presidential ticket. [Snip] given Biden’s unusually low-key political effort this time, Harris has been largely invisible. Token visits here and there. Now comes her largest opportunity — and biggest, most dangerous challenge. As a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Harris will be the prominent opponent of President Trump’s third Supreme Court nominee,
Debating the Trump-Biden debates:
Will they matter this time?
11 replies
Posted by SurferLad 9/22/2020 8:52:57 AM Post Reply
Exactly 60 years ago this week, a senator and another former vice president launched a new American political tradition: presidential candidate debates. Next week, the first of this cycle’s three debates is scheduled between President Donald Trump and former vice president Joe Biden. [Snip] Democrats’ real concern should be that the 77-year-old political veteran’s mental acuity is not what it was eight and 12 years ago. And
Will Trump’s overseas troop withdrawals
help him — or will they even matter?
18 replies
Posted by SurferLad 9/15/2020 8:16:39 AM Post Reply
In theory, deploying and/or withdrawing U.S. military forces abroad is all about this country’s national security. In practice, however, politics is always close by. And in this election year, both President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are taking credit for troop decisions. Biden’s campaign claim that he was in charge of withdrawing 150,000 U.S. service members from Iraq in 2011 is what Mark Twain would call “a stretcher.” Trump made reducing foreign military involvements a major
Will Joe Biden ever face tough questions
during this campaign?
14 replies
Posted by SurferLad 9/9/2020 6:42:29 AM Post Reply
Joe Biden would be 78 years old by Inauguration Day in January, seven years beyond the average lifespan of a male born in 1942. He had two brain aneurysms in the 1980s. In his 17-month journey to the Oval Office, the Democratic nominee has made scores of claims and dozens of promises. [Snip] Like Hillary Clinton four years ago, Biden has not made himself available for much media questioning. So, Biden’s news conference last week was a rare opportunity for diligent reporters to probe the plans, thoughts and ideas of the man who would be the oldest ever to assume the nation’s highest office.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article