Impeachment 'Whistleblower' May
Be Implicated in Biden-Burisma
Caper, Trump Lawyer Says
PJ Media,
by
Tyler O´Neil
Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect,
1/30/2020 4:44:39 AM
The unnamed "whistleblower" who launched the investigation that became the impeachment of President Donald Trump may himself be implicated in the Obama administration's decision to ultimately overlook the conflict of interest involving then-Vice President Joe Biden (administration point man on Ukraine) and his son Hunter, who served on the board of the notoriously corrupt Ukrainian gas firm Burisma. The fact that key questions about the "whistleblower" have been shut down from the start is a serious violation of Trump's due process, according to Patrick Philbin, deputy counsel to the president.
Philbin listed three key due process concerns: a lack of authorization, the Democrats not allowing Trump
Reply 1 - Posted by:
2assume 1/30/2020 4:52:29 AM (No. 301904)
BOOM
Mike drop
6 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
StormCnter 1/30/2020 5:52:54 AM (No. 301911)
I've watched hours of the hearings and Philbin is my favorite of the President's team. He's low-key, but entirely in control of his facts and his arguments.
14 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
anniebc 1/30/2020 7:38:13 AM (No. 301975)
Of course the "whistleblower" is guilty of something; he's a democrat operative. I'd be willing to bet that there was not one honest person in the barack obiden administration. The plan was for Biden to get his wealth, funneled through family members from Barisma and other connection schemes, while oblama and his hunk of wife got theirs through phony book and movie sales and other ill-gotten money schemes. They are corrupt to the core and sleep well at night.
14 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Clinger 1/30/2020 8:19:22 AM (No. 302009)
I can't think of a better reason to demand to know who Shifty believes to be the blower of said whistle. My pet theory; it's a composite of Charmerella, Vindman and Shift himself.
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Pearson365 1/30/2020 8:25:47 AM (No. 302013)
If only the FBI and DoJ didn’t have to receive Schiff’s approval in order to investigate the Bidens and Eric Ciaramella, this ugly impeachment charade would never have begun. Same Schiff sign off apparently needed by but never given to Jeff Sessions and the now never mentioned John Huber in order to investigate Hillary, Obama, Lynch, Rosenstein and dozens of other Obama officials. Schiff is apparently far more powerful than we realize since he keeps Obama regime officials free from indictments and out of sight*.
* - Except for those Obama regime officials wanting contracts with CNN and MSDNC, promoting their books or considering a 3rd run for the presidency.
2 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Hugh Akston 1/30/2020 8:36:24 AM (No. 302030)
Imagine a trial where counsel for the defense is not allowed discovery.
Imagine no more, we've seen it.
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 1/30/2020 8:42:36 AM (No. 302037)
I wonder if any of these Burisma clowns claimed that income on their Federal tax form? Did the whistleblower register himself as a "foreign agent" before applying for his NSC job? As soon as they subpoena the little rat then we can find out how his was truly the "fruit of the poison tree."
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
davew 1/30/2020 9:10:17 AM (No. 302081)
They already have the public evidence that Pam Bondi presented. She has the FOIA obtained email that Ken Vogel used in his Politico article showing Eric Ciaramella hosted a meeting of NSC senior staff and Ukrainian prosecutors in August 2016 where they were directed to dig up dirt on Trump and his campaign. Andrei Teleschenko was one of the prosecutors who was there and testified under oath that this was the purpose of the meeting and Ciaramella was the host.
This request led to the delivery of the "Black ledger" that was sent to the FBI via Bruce Ohr and leaked to Michael Issakoff of Yahoo News by Alex Chalupa of the DNC. It was a forged document that supposedly showed Paul Manafort was working for the Russians and forced him to resign as Trump's campaign manager. The Mueller investigation determined it was phony since it was never used in the case against Manafort.
The whistle blower has been trying to get Trump for years. The impeachment hoax has been the crime of obstruction of justice from the beginning.
1 person likes this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mathman 1/30/2020 9:36:06 AM (No. 302107)
No.
No.
And again no.
Joe Biden, and the whole Biden clan, are forever protected by Executive Privilege.
The Bidens are incapable of doing wrong, as they are Dims. By definition, Dims are innocent. And cannot be proven guilty. They can't even be investigated.
Just because Lunchbucket Joe got a Ukranian prosecutor fired by threatening to hold U S aid does not mean there was a quid pro quo there. Just because he said "do this or else" has no meaning, since he is a Dim. There was not a smidgen of corruption in the Obama era. Nobody got a seat on the Burisma board and several million dollars because of their family connections. Burisma needed a coke-sniffing discharged vet for reasons yet unknown. Trust me.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 1/30/2020 10:05:15 AM (No. 302145)
Well, we know that Schiffty has been implicated in unethical ways with several of his own witnesses. So the fact his whistleblower may be the one who started this whole mess is not surprising at all. Explains why Schiffty has refused to call the guy, and why he is hiding any number of documents and reports. He knows he is a liar, and he is past the point of no return.
0 people like this.
I have been convinced from the beginning that the "whistleblower" and the person who told him about the phone call were horrified at the thought that the corruption around Burisma and the Bidens might be investigated because they were afraid of what would be revealed about their own corruption.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
janjan 1/30/2020 10:31:25 AM (No. 302171)
Highly likely but very hard to prove. There are too many players willing to lie about it.
0 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 1/30/2020 10:31:54 AM (No. 302172)
He's a leaker of classified info not a whistleblower. Similar to Hillary and her emails. Lock them both up.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
66Strat 1/30/2020 10:58:09 AM (No. 302191)
Philbin was brilliant. He calmly and confidently carved up the Dem travesty and exposed its many weaknesses in a clear voice. It was a joy to watch. Well done Mr. Philbin.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
earlybird 1/30/2020 12:29:03 PM (No. 302274)
Philbin is low key, not flashy, and brilliant. Lethal legal mind. His performance yesterday in the Q&A was stellar...
6 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Smart11344 1/30/2020 2:23:24 PM (No. 302361)
Wonderful news. I hope it comes to pass.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)