U.S. moves to protect
our personnel in Iraq
Power Line,
by
Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect,
1/1/2020 4:47:11 AM
With developments going from bad to worse for the Iranian regime, the mullahs have decided to play a 40 year-old card. They have orchestrated an attack on a U.S. embassy, this time the one in Baghdad.
President Trump summarized the situation in this tweet:
Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will. Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible. In addition, we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified.
Trump’s expectation of protection from the Iraqi government
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 1/1/2020 5:41:47 AM (No. 275766)
Last night watching the news, I was thinking that all of these Iran protester were gather in one spot. What an easy target. Problem solved.
5 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 1/1/2020 8:19:51 AM (No. 275801)
And therein lies the rub. Will the Iraqi government step up to protect our embassy? Or should we just pull out and let them fend for themselves. Their government has not been the most reliable in the past. Poster #2 is so filled with ignorance it breaks my heart. It is not up to the boots on the ground to decide to fire. It is up to the commanders at the Pentagon who decide. And IIRC, Carter disarmed those Marines in 1979. The most trouble embassies ever have is when a democrat is in the WH. Clinton allowed for many bombings, Carter had the hostage crisis, and Obama had Benghazi. Give the Marines a break and stop with the disrespect.
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jar 1/1/2020 8:58:03 AM (No. 275826)
When Obama pulled the troops out of Iraq, Iran came in in full force. Iraq has become a satellite of Iran. Iranian blocks control the Iraqi Parliament, and the caretaker Prime Minister of the Iraqi government is an Iranian puppet. Iran is stealing Iraqi wealth and using Iraq to bypass US sanctions, Yes, we need more troops there by the thousands.
3 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
udanja99 1/1/2020 9:21:45 AM (No. 275850)
Thank you, #3. The Marine Security Guard Detachments can only protect the embassies if they are allowed to do it. There are still many desk-riding 0bama generals in the Pentagon. PDT needs to get rid of them too while he’s cleaning up the swamp.
6 people like this.
FTA: "...the number of troops will initially be less than a 1,000. A larger force of several thousand soldiers has also been placed on stand-by..."
Another "surge" to secure a $750 Million embassy that was supposed to be the most secure in the world. Waiting for a useless "government" to protect it, even after nearly two decades of training and "liberty". More American lives potentially on the line...to what end?
Any "orders" sent down by Jimmy Carter, who left office in 1981, are easily rescindable today, and have been ever since then. Somehow these orders survived several CINCs, from Reagan to Trump. Seems an empty excuse for exactly what #2 wrote. These Marines, following orders or otherwise, are clearly nothing more than decoration if unable to use their skills and weapons for the purported purpose they are stationed at our embassies.
1 person likes this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
HotRod 1/1/2020 10:13:17 AM (No. 275902)
I think direct conflict with Iran is inevitable, as much as it is unwanted. It will not be a nuking of cities or bombing of the population, but will be targeted action against the leadership, military facilities and nuclear development locations. We will not go it alone either. Israel is at the tipping point too. The Russians and Chinese will make a lot of noise, but will end up influencing the remaining leadership to surrender. They need the oil.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
udanja99 1/1/2020 10:30:26 AM (No. 275919)
I’ve just gone back and re-read some articles about this posted here yesterday and found that this is not the first time that #2 has bashed the Marines. I wonder what his issue is. Was he tossed out because he couldn’t cut it at boot camp?
My husband walked in and volunteered to be a Marine in 1969, even though he had a high draft number and at a time when some of his friends were burning their draft cards and high-tailing it to Canada. He served for 2 years and got orders for Nam, but they were rescinded because, by then, the Pentagon was beginning to pull the Marines out in accordance with the “first in, first out” rule. I also served at 2 American embassies overseas, one behind the Iron Curtain, and have tremendous respect for ALL Marines.
12 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bighambone 1/1/2020 11:21:39 AM (No. 275949)
Most of the media reports on what is occurring at the US Embassy is misleading as the “protesters” have not taken over the Embassy grounds, what they have actually done is take over part of a wall and a couple of buildings on the compound perimeter setting fires and vandalizing US property there. The US Marine guard force has kept the “protesters” away from the main embassy buildings. Right now it will tell a lot as to the competence and motives of the Iraqi government and military by what happens next, as while the Iraqi military should never have allowed the “protesters” to even approach the embassy outer perimeter in the first place, and should now be moving the “protesters” from the embassy grounds.
3 people like this.
Attacking the Marines is unfair. They cannot act outside of the rules. Calling them a decoration is out of line. They are there under orders. This mocking of Marines when rules may not have allowed them to anything different is unfair. There is a valid issue raised by this situation. We should get our buns out of there but with that aside, this lands on the back of The Commander. If we are to be there then lets make it clear that if the embassy or people are attacked we will take immediate action and use whatever force our Marines deem is necessary. What is this stuff about trusting in anyone else to defend our people wherever they may be.
With the advent of a new year we have seen the lists of promises President Trump has kept and it is fantastic. Reaching back into time to show what great things he has done. I would like for him to reach back in history and bring back the ... and carry a big stick.
0 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 1/3/2020 2:10:43 AM (No. 277100)
YES, we did. Blew the head terrorist from Iran all to hell.
0 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 1/3/2020 2:12:19 AM (No. 277103)
Unfortunately, the Embassy Marines have to follow orders from the Ambassador, frequently a real loser.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)