Post New Article

The ‘It Takes A Trump To Change Washington’
Defense Of The President

Original Article

Posted By: unionriverman2316, 11/3/2019 9:09:53 AM

Some supporters of President Trump have adopted the following defense of the (at times) nasty, over-the-top rhetoric Trump uses against his adversaries: Trump is “no Mr. Nice Guy,” but “sometimes it takes a Donald Trump to change Washington.” In fact, Trump’s recently released campaign ad makes this pitch in just that language. As a means of making ethical Trump supporters feel better about backing the president, this defense has appeal. But is there anything to it? Not much. Ronald Reagan changed Washington without being Trump-like. Headline corrected*

Comments:

Well known member of the DC elite....and well known "never-Trumper" Mirengoff is at it again. Forget about Trumps accomplishments....the man is just is NOT "presidential" enough! PM's writings belong in the WaPoop.

*Headlines in all caps must be changed to upper and lower case.   Please read Rules &  FAQs before posting again.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Knotwyrkin 11/3/2019 9:15:22 AM (No. 225932)
Whatever...
3 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: msts 11/3/2019 9:17:13 AM (No. 225935)
You would think that, given the Presidents approval rating, his standing in both the black and hispanic (legal) community and specifically the states that had been forgotten, the era of "If we play nice, the dems will too" would be over. A guy once told me that the reason people are nice to each other in DC is to make sure they are invited to all the parties. Hell of a reason to betray your constituents
15 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: zuker5 11/3/2019 9:27:24 AM (No. 225942)
Regarding Kavanaugh, no other Republican would have stuck with him during that coordinated smear. They would have folded, and given the Democrats his scalp. Ignoring that simple truth, is ignoring reality.
32 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: chance_232 11/3/2019 9:36:01 AM (No. 225956)
Reagan didn't change Washington. And this missive ignores the fact that the Democrat party of the 1980's is not the same party 40 years later. Yes, the democrats were nasty towards Reagan, but nothing like today. And the press.....at least they attempted to be fair and kept their bias under some control.
26 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: John C 11/3/2019 9:41:27 AM (No. 225963)
He is fighting back at the swamp and I don't envy his job. Media continues to insult his wife and kids. Democrats show no respect. He doesn't smoke or drink, he protects life. Paul, take a breath. FTA: "But excessive rhetoric on these fronts can be counterproductive". I love our President!
21 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: Saryden 11/3/2019 9:44:25 AM (No. 225966)
From an octogenarian, former public school teacher, mother, grandmother, wife and homemaker: President Donald J. Trump is the ONLY one who has stepped up with his life, fortune, patriotism, and hard work to save the USA from Socio-Communism, Islamic Terrorism, and the Swamp. He can say and do whatever he wants and I say Yea -- Bless him!!
46 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: DVC 11/3/2019 9:48:24 AM (No. 225968)
I would argue that, as good and conservative and principled as Ronald Reagan was, HE CHANGED NOTHING. His VP was a Deep Stater, and pretty much erased half of Reagan's changes AS A REPUBLICAN, and the next Dem continued the "march through the institutions" to destroy this country. No more Mr. Nice Guy.
24 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Toby Ten Bears 11/3/2019 9:53:43 AM (No. 225976)
Paul... You're part of the problem. Now get to your fainting couch... This is no longer 1890.
18 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: MindMadeUp 11/3/2019 10:15:26 AM (No. 225995)
Given the bug-eyed screaming, biting, clawing and crying going on in Washington right now to prevent Trump from succeeding, it may take even more than a Trump to actually "change Washington." My fear is that when Trump is gone the mud will ooze back in place to fill his tracks.
14 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: The Remnants 11/3/2019 10:24:57 AM (No. 226002)
Oh, spare me, Mr. Mirengoff. Be in his shoes for the last almost three years; accomplish all that he has, while simultaneously wondering who is truly friend or foe; cope with all the nastiness he has put up with on a daily basis, oftentimes against members of his own family; admit he has more trustworthy allies in foreign countries than in his own; put up 24/7 with the insufferable mainstream media who wouldn't know objective truth if they tripped over it. Be in his shoes for a day or two. Bet you would be tempted to scream "enough". You might even use a cuss word or two. Truth be told, I think a lot of Trump's haters are jealous of him - for different reasons.
28 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: pros7767 11/3/2019 10:27:07 AM (No. 226004)
Ted Cruz or Tom Cotton would have folded like a cheap suit as soon as the Dems started their nasty nonsense. (No disrespect intended to either.) -The economy is thriving because of Trump. Therefore, jobs are being created. -ISIS is destroyed because Trump allowed the military to do what it does best. Fight! -Illegal entry is being reduced because Trump took a tough stand with Mexico. No one else would have. -The Russian hoax would have been used against Cruz or Cotton or whoever was elected except Hillary. They would have resigned. Shut up Paul! And I couldn't agree more with #6!
18 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: Laotzu 11/3/2019 10:31:47 AM (No. 226009)
The Regan Era? You mean back when there were Pro-Life Democrats who had served in WWII? Right before Clinton took over and gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Senator Fullbright -- the leader of the opposition to the '64 Civil Rights Act? Is dope now legal in the Beltway?
13 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: Skeptical1 11/3/2019 10:50:24 AM (No. 226026)
Amazing what people can be blind to. Trump uses "intemperate and uncivil rhetoric "? Compared to what? Look how the Left treats nice, polite, and very well-spoken and inoffensive people like Brett Kavanaugh or Jordan Peterson. For that matter, try disagreeing with a liberal at a dinner party. You'll be told that you're a racist homophobic fascist. So who's "intemperate and uncivil"? Trump is special, Mirengoff has that right. He is a curious blend of greatness and, shall we say, eccentricity. But not mean spirited and intolerant, like most of the Left. Sometimes a little unpolished, bumptious, vain, or repetitious. These things may be flaws, but they may also be part of his armor, allowing him to endure far more abuse than most men could ever handle. The Trump phenomenon is truly fascinating as a study in character and sociology, and Mirengoff might write something more interesting if he would look at it with an open and inquiring mind.
18 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: ROLFNader 11/3/2019 11:01:34 AM (No. 226038)
Agree with #9- It might take pitchforks and torches.... a LOT of them.
6 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: 49 Ford 11/3/2019 11:10:01 AM (No. 226043)
I no longer have any patience with these prissy, "Oh, look how thoughtful and judicious I am!" sorts of commentary. All the earlier posters make the relevant points. Mirengoff and those who thinks as he does really do need to stop falling back on Reagan as a one-size-fits-all template. RR was a different man working in a different era, and you cannot separate a man's style and approach from who he is. That's just human nature, Mr. M, and all the pearl clutching and furrow-browed consternation in the world will never change that.
13 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: DVC 11/3/2019 11:17:42 AM (No. 226046)
#14, Pitchforks and torches? Not going to work. AR-15s and Colt 1911s, maybe.
2 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: Wendybird 11/3/2019 11:18:17 AM (No. 226048)
Agree with Skeptical. For the most part, PDTrump fights back and corrects his critics. Usually in a precise, humorous way, as appreciated by people blessed with a sense of humor. This excludes most democrat-socialist-liberals, whichever they call themselves. He is one of a kind, indefatigable it seems, and fortunately on the right side. We would surely be in deep doo doo, doomed, if he were on the other.
10 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: earlybird 11/3/2019 11:26:18 AM (No. 226051)
Now I know why I skip Mirengoff. A hardcore #NeverTrumper, he always comes up with a piece of rubbish like this one. John Hinderaker is the only one worth reading at PowerLine. And sometimes Scott Johnson.
4 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: Strike3 11/3/2019 11:42:44 AM (No. 226063)
Results are what count. The path taken to get there is meaningless as long as it's legal, ethical and nobody dies.
3 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: BarryNo 11/3/2019 12:10:39 PM (No. 226083)
What people are beginning to realize, Mr. Mirengoff, is that Trump is US - us as in, 'We the People'. Elites who want his head would treat any of us with the same contempt and hatefulness if we stumbled into their path. To them, we are not worth acknowledging as human. We're only useful if we continue to grease their desire for power. If we get in the way, we're barely worth the effort to crush us. But Trump is different. He has them baffled. That seat at him, but he buzzes back agressively. America was founded to restrict and diminish the power of government for the benefit of its citizens. It was founded so that no matter what you are, beggar or industrialist, politician or priest, police, military or everyman, we could expect equal justice and protections under rules we approved of through our elected officials - our so-called public servants. But what do we have today? Graft corruption, immorality, and either indifference, or the wielding of crushing power whenever we point out what is supposed to happen, by the same people who object to Trump. Perhaps Obama was correct in one aspect of his declaration that our evil has been part of America since its founding. After all, he embraced that evil. And meanwhile, every promise Trump has made and attempted to implement has been slowed and challenged by these people. The Democrats and the Deep State they helped to create must be utterly destroyed. Otherwise, we will never see the Liberty and Justice for all, enshrined in our pledge of alligience. Let's win this fight.
11 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: jeffkinnh 11/3/2019 12:41:17 PM (No. 226104)
What a maroon Paul is. "Ronald Reagan changed Washington without being Trump-like." Reagan never faced a conspiracy within the government to delegitimize his election. He never faced Carter's FBI and CIA conspiring against him. He never faced a Left willing to do and say anything to win. Reagan never dared some of the big changes that Trump has because he KNEW there would be blowback. Instead, he chose to leave those things alone as to not stir things up. As to not creating jobs, please, from the MOMENT of Trump's election the economy started to improve. Trump's cutting of regulations unleashed business to grow and profit. Trump's tax cuts freed up capital and allowed capital held overseas to be recaptured. That turbo charged growth. NO president directly creates jobs. He gets government OUT OF THE WAY and creates conditions for business to flourish. Then business creates jobs. That is THE WAY IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK. If Trump had to kick some shins to make that happen, so what? "Nor has Trump’s rhetoric stopped a single illegal immigrant from entering the U.S." Yet, such rhetoric and the threat of some economic sanctions cause Mexico to wake up and push back on those invading us through their country. "the nomination and confirmation of good judges and Justices" If you pay attention, once he nominates good people, Trump hasn't usually said much except when the process gets gummed up. Often we just hands it to McConnell and that is it. As for "cutting back of excessive government regulations", Trump just said the government is over regulated and told people to cut to to introduce 1 new one. There wasn't a lot of fuss about it. The agencies over greatly over delivered. Paul claims a Cruz or Cotton would have delivered such changes. Maybe, but there is no proof of that and no evidence they could have had that impact on Washington. In fact, it is doubtful they could have driven the election to win the Senate and the House at the same time. Then "President Cruz" would have accomplished very little. Sure, sometimes President Trump has pushed the boundaries a bit. But people who aren't willing to do that won't have the accomplishments either. Paul seems to think the two things are independent but they are part of a package. Boldness invites additional risk and the possibility of mistakes. However, I give Trump the credit of striking an excellent balance. He has accomplished an enormous amount of great stuff and the few things that I can niggle about, frankly, are not worth the point. Media and pundits want to box presidents in by defining boundaries of behavior, i.e. PC. However, we didn't vote for these pundits. They didn't go through a grueling campaign. They don't face 90+% of negative stories and outright false attacks and an bureaucratic conspiracy that still continues. Most of these pundits would be squashed like bugs in the face of this. Paul, you aren't the arbiter of what it takes to win and who should get the credit.
7 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: edgar 11/3/2019 1:03:03 PM (No. 226115)
I happen to believe that Washington has been broken for a long time. That is why Trump has been successful. He has to fight everyday to push back the entrenched Deep State, but he with no support from Congress, he has pushed the US economy to places it has never been, in a positive way, he is working to close our Southern border and is trying to reverse the misfortune brought to us by NAFTA. As Ross Perot said, "Do you hear that sucking sound? That is the sound of US jobs going to Mexico." As Nancy Pelosi said, "Embrace the suck!" NAFTA Nancy needs to be pushed out of way, not Donald Trump.
5 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: JackBurton 11/3/2019 2:37:51 PM (No. 226158)
Did Reagan have to confront Antifa? Did his supporters get shadowbanned or hit with eggs.... or just hit? This has been building since the early 90s and we've played by 80s rules. Time it changed.
3 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: cThree 11/3/2019 3:11:40 PM (No. 226177)
and what will it take to change Paul Mirengoff ?
2 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "unionriverman2316"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by unionriverman2316"
We Now Know: Full of Schiff 2 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 12/15/2019 8:17:10 PM Post Reply
In a February 2018 memo that earned him noting but opprobrium and abuse, Rep. Devin Nunes laid out the truth of the FISA abuse underlying the Obama administration’s surveillance of the Trump campaign. Rep. Adam Schiff disputed the Nunes memo with a competing memo of his own. Following the Department of Justice Inspector General report issued last week by Michael Horowitz, however, Schiff has been incapacitated from keeping up this particular ruse. We have come to know Schiff as something of a pathological liar. Nunes now seeks to conduct an intervention.
Democratic Law Professor: It Is Wrong to
Impeach Trump Just Because You're All Mad
6 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 12/4/2019 5:15:44 PM Post Reply

Speaking during a House Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday morning, George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley called out Democrats and fellow members of the panel for moving forward with impeachment because "everyone is mad." “I get it. You're mad. The president's mad. My Republican friends are mad. My Democratic friends are mad. My wife is mad. My kids are mad. Even my dog seems mad and Luna is a golden-doodle and they don't get mad.  Wide headline split *

Trump Derangement Syndrome
Breeds Professional Malpractice
15 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 12/3/2019 7:31:17 AM Post Reply
A sign of the times, that historians one day will puzzle over: Psychiatrists Organize Campaign to Declare Trump ‘Dangerous,’ Back Impeachment. The campaign involves the usual suspects: Psychiatrists with the World Mental Health Coalition are soliciting signatures in a campaign to support the impeachment of President Donald Trump predicated on claims that he is mentally unstable. Or, put another way, on the ground that he is a Republican. In an email forwarded to PJ Media, three psychiatrists with the coalition ask other psychiatrists to sign on to a petition to the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee to include a statement on Trump’s supposed mental instability into the official record of the impeachment inquiry.
About That Thanksgiving Visit to Kabul 3 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 12/3/2019 6:55:33 AM Post Reply
RUSH: Did you see that the Drive-Bys actually fired a reporter? I didn’t even know Newsweek was around. I guess Newsweek is a Web only thing now since magazines are in such dire straits. But there was an infobabe for Newsweek. What’s her name? Jessica Kwong, K-w-o-n-g. Jessica Kwong tweeted on Wednesday, “How is Trump Spending Thanksgiving? Tweeting, Golfing, and More.” Of course, how did Obama spend holidays? He golfed, and he golfed, and he hung around liberals on Martha’s Vineyard, and then he golfed — and with Obama golf?
Orange Cult Leader Using Mind
Control to Block Impeachment
9 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/27/2019 7:57:31 AM Post Reply
RUSH: So given that this is happening, yesterday I offered Pelosi a way out of this. I gave her a philosophical way out, and that is to say that, while the evidence is overwhelming and we all know that Trump is scum and we know that he attempted to meddle and we know that he attempted to investigate his own opponent, we know, we know, we know, we know, we still have to deal with partisan Republican bigots who happen to run the Senate. And there’s no way that they’re going to join us in agreement that Trump needs to go. In fact, he’s gonna be acquitted.
Dems mull Mueller impeachment count 16 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/20/2019 9:45:32 AM Post Reply
House Democrats reportedly are considering whether to pursue in their impeachment inquiry matters arising from the Mueller investigation. Specifically, they are looking at whether President Trump lied to Robert Mueller. The Washington Post’s report on this development is based on representations made by House Democrats to the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. The Dems told the court that they need secret grand jury evidence from the Mueller probe to be released in order to consider, as part of their impeachment inquiry, whether Trump lied to Mueller.
If Gun Control Stops School Shootings,
There Wouldn’t Be A Santa Clarita
7 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/18/2019 8:41:01 AM Post Reply
With Santa Clarita not even a distant memory, anti-gun voices are already using it to demand more gun control. Even before the facts were known, Sen. Dick Blumenthal demanded the Senate capitulate to his whims and pass a universal background check bill that wouldn’t have done anything to prevent the shooting as far as anyone can tell. This is normal for anti-gunners. They routinely prattle about how we need more gun control after a mass shooting. However, Santa Clarita is in California, the most gun controlled state in the nation.
Fed Ex vs the New York Times 6 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/18/2019 8:18:05 AM Post Reply
The New York Times today took after FedEx for the sin of having a low corporate tax bill. Sample: FedEx reaped big savings [from the Trump tax cut], bringing its effective tax rate from 34 percentin fiscal year 2017 to less than zero in fiscal year 2018, meaning that, overall, the government technically owed it money. But it did not increase investment in new equipment and other assets in the fiscal year that followed, as Mr. Smith said businesses like his would. . . Fred Smith, the founder and CEO of FedEx, decided to punch back twice as hard:
What Trump wanted 15 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/15/2019 9:40:57 AM Post Reply
In an unflattering column about President Trump called “Incompetence is not an impeachable offense,” Marc Thiessen writes: What we saw on display Wednesday were two dedicated, experienced career foreign policy officials who had been desperately trying to figure out what the president wanted — and inferring his intentions based on snippets of information from others. But their efforts to divine Trump’s desires presume that the president knew what he wanted. It’s not clear he did. His handling of Ukraine seemed less the execution of an intelligible plan than a chaotic mishmash of constantly changing urges and demands.
The impeachment hearing, opening salvos 7 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/13/2019 10:04:34 PM Post Reply
I was able to watch the first hour and a half of today’s impeachment hearing until a prior, far more enjoyable commitment took precedence. I saw the opening statements of Adam Schiff and Devin Nunes, plus the opening statements of today’s two witnesses, George Kent and Bill Taylor. Here are my impressions: Schiff devoted his opening statement to a summary of what he says the evidence will show. He presented his statement in measured-sounding tones, a welcome departure from his previous attempt to put words in President Trump’s mouth. Most of the facts Schiff presented are supported by documents and/or testimony.
Coup's Next 8 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/13/2019 8:18:38 AM Post Reply
Today the House Intelligence Committee holds its first public hearings in the Schiff show. The Schiff show is a sort of preface to the impeachment article(s) that the House will send over to the Senate before the end of the year. Something’s happening here. Why is the House Intelligence Committee holding impeachment hearings in search of a high crime or misdemeanor? The structure of the production has struck me from the beginning as a variation of the Russia hoax that consumed the first two-plus years of the Trump administration. The Ukraine matter is to usher in the end of the Trump era by hook or by crook.
Don’t Laugh Too Hard at Bloomberg
or He Might Not Run
7 replies
Posted by unionriverman2316 11/11/2019 8:48:05 AM Post Reply
Name the Democrat who is super-excited to have Michael Bloomberg barge into the Dem primaries like some nutty ex-girlfriend who gave you crabs popping in at your wedding. Where is the groundswell of support behind this pint-sized presidential aspirant? Perhaps the Democratic consultants who didn’t sign up with one of the other goofy candidates are happy. The micro-zillionaire may not have charisma or a vision or actual human support, but he’s got endless bucks to squander on electoral parasites.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article