Did Adam Schiff Just Admit There
Was No Quid Pro Quo?
PJ Media,
by
Matt Margolis
Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac,
10/14/2019 8:42:39 AM
Appearing on CBS's Face The Nation Sunday morning, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff essentially conceded that there was no quid pro quo between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by saying "there doesn't need to be a quid pro quo." "We have discovered in short order not only the contents of that call, but also the preparatory work that went into the call. The effort to condition something the Ukrainian president deeply sought, and that was a meeting with the president to establish that this new president of Ukraine had a powerful patron in the president of the United States that was of vital importance to Ukraine,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
lakerman1 10/14/2019 8:53:57 AM (No. 206864)
Cass Sunstein, Barack Obola's 'regulations czar' was on one of the cable shows a couple of days ag, and argued that there was an implicit quid pro contained in DJT's telephone call with President Zelensky of the Ukraine, and therefore, committed an impeachable offense.
That is like something out of a work of fiction, where a Russian man is charged with a crime, but no one would tell him what the crime was.
(Sunstein married his student who came from Ireland, and became Barack Obola's UN Secretary. She also unmasked a whole bunch of Americans, for no good reason.)
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 10/14/2019 9:07:32 AM (No. 206879)
He also seems to be dissolving the “CIA rumorblower”, first saying that “he” would not testify but would submit “letters”; then saying that his testimony might not be needed at all…
Things fall apart...
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 10/14/2019 9:08:54 AM (No. 206882)
Cass Sunstein is a flaming liberal, married to Samantha Power. A deadly duo. Yes, Obama & Co will have folks like Cass all over the cable shows… Cass’s my name and propaganda’s my game...
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
msjena 10/14/2019 9:28:34 AM (No. 206904)
#1, I was just thinking, where is the crime? Previous impeachment efforts have involved actual crimes—perjury, obstruction of justice. The DOJ has already said there is no crime here. Isn’t there also a free speech issue here?
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
planetgeo 10/14/2019 9:37:36 AM (No. 206914)
The Democrats don't need no stinkin crime. They just keep making Schiff up. Every time one of their fake accusations gets knocked down, they just keep coming up with a new one. How much longer are the Republicans going to allow this preposterous bullSchiff to continue?
11 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Clinger 10/14/2019 9:39:53 AM (No. 206917)
Ok Shifty, I'll agree a quit quo pro is not required for an impeachment but guess what, a crime is. So if it wasn't a quid quo pro what is it? Or do we have to impeach him first to determine why we are impeaching him?
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 10/14/2019 9:43:06 AM (No. 206925)
They have absolutely NOTHING. The transcript is clear, and it totally destroys their lying case that they were trying to build up with their false 'whistleblower' baloney.
This is a completely corrupt, criminal, false process, based on lies - the President did NOT do what they say he did, and that is PROVEN by the transcript.
9 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 10/14/2019 9:47:57 AM (No. 206933)
Yes, yes - - that's it!
Zelensky wanted to take a selfie with Trump - - and Trump wouldn't let him do it!
Yes - - impeachment! No selfie! Impeach Trump! Impeach forty-five!
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
HotRod 10/14/2019 9:54:14 AM (No. 206944)
Yep. Schiff and the other democrats thought President Trump would not release the transcript, exerting executive privilege. They were shocked and knocked on their heels when President Trump released it. That shot their plan of claiming lies and crimes, which would be defended only by President Trump's denials.
Ha! The best laid plans... Now the democrats look even more desperate and ridiculous!
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Gruntmedic 10/14/2019 10:01:28 AM (No. 206961)
What a crock, he's making stuff up again.
5 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 10/14/2019 11:27:18 AM (No. 207040)
Let me guess, the previous president of Ukraine didn't seek the powerful patron of the United States by placing a call with the previous administration?
That the U.S. Ambassador was blocking visa applications to Ukrainians who wanted to travel to the United States and provide information about the corruption?
I think it's common courtesy to call on potential allies, unless Rep. bull Schiff thinks otherwise.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hershey 10/14/2019 11:36:38 AM (No. 207050)
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff is an oxymoron....
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
john56 10/14/2019 12:10:40 PM (No. 207070)
Who needs evidence when you're running a secret Kangaroo court?
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 10/14/2019 12:45:18 PM (No. 207103)
He's only protected from libel when in our House so he has to be careful or Trump will sue him.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)