Scientists Prove Man-Made Global Warming Is a Hoax
Breitbart Politics,
by
John Nolte
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
4/10/2019 7:54:29 PM
The far-left ThinkProgress reports that scientists have finally proven that the theory of man-made Global Warming is a total hoax. Of course, no one will admit it, but that is exactly what has happened. A new scientific study shows has revealed the following: Current CO2 levels of 410 parts per million (ppm) were last seen on Earth three million years ago, according to the most detailed reconstruction of the Earth’s climate by researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in Science Advances. (Snip) but there is one major difference between three million years ago and today…
Reply 1 - Posted by:
padiva 4/10/2019 8:09:36 PM (No. 29805)
Hahaha. Liberals think that they are as omnipotent as Gd.
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bad-hair 4/10/2019 8:10:58 PM (No. 29799)
Yes, for godsake get rid of the poison in the air. Get on a boat and tie up across the bay from Rio. The yellow air when you wake up sucks. Realize that the USA does more to eliminate REAL pollution than any other country on earth. If Occasionally-Cognizant is right and we´re all doomed in 12 years, call China, India, Russia, Bosnia, Croatia, et al.
39 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
red1066 4/10/2019 8:14:31 PM (No. 29820)
Facts don´t matter to leftists. All the evidence in the world won´t make them question what they have been told and have grown up learning. In that respect, it´s more like a religion then a scientific theory. I wonder what the new name will be for their theory. Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever.
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 4/10/2019 8:28:51 PM (No. 29795)
This has never been a science problem. It is a political issue using fake science to move it along. The kind of massive political changes that the Left is demanding needed a reason. They wanted the changes anyway, it is a power grab. but they needed a reason to lube the rails of change. So they paid people to make one up.
The people that are doing this have built their careers on this. Academics are arrogant to begin with. They claim their ideas are correct, even though we see many such ideas that have been abandoned a century later. At the time, they were just as arrogant in pushing their beliefs.
The problem is, politicians have learned how to manipulate and corrupt science and harness the arrogance and ego of scientists.
Don´t expect any big recognition that the Global Warming crowd is wrong. They won´t admit it. They can´t afford to.
47 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
seamusm 4/10/2019 9:21:43 PM (No. 29793)
No they did not. Just as Mueller didn´t ´exonerate´ Trump, science cannot PROVE that Man(kind) doesn´t contribute to global warming AKA Climate Change. And further the author makes an unscientific extrapolation of historical data. Yes, it is true that climate has and always will change from era to era. And yes, it is true that CO2 levels and global temperatures have historically been much higher than present and even projected levels. But that truth just doesn´t disprove the possibility we contribute to climate change. What IS a hoax has to do with some imagined ´consensus´ of scientists and any belief that scientists understand our Earth and can predict what will happen tomorrow (let alone 12 years from now). The whole tapestry of foolishness is indeed a political smokescreen for leftist efforts to control our lives. And sadly our millenial children (mine too) are witless disciples.
16 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Catherine 4/10/2019 9:51:23 PM (No. 29812)
This climate hoax is all about ultra rich getting richer by denying us cheap oil and gas and forcing everyone to buy solar panels, wind turbines, etc., from those who own the companies who make them. AlGore made a pretty penny selling carbon footprints to big chemical companies. I never did find out how he came to own them.
23 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Avanti1 4/10/2019 9:51:35 PM (No. 29798)
#5
No one disputes that CO2 CONTRIBUTES to a rise in global temperatures. The dispute relates to whether or not MAN-MADE CO2 is the DOMINANT FACTOR in a ris8e in global temperature.
If I were to urinate into the ocean would that contribute to a rise in seal level? Of course, but it would be insignificant and not cause for concern.
To isolate the degree to which MAN-CAUSED CO2 contributes to global temperature change, one must account for ALL OTHER causes (some of which may not yet been identified); a monumental task that must take into account all of the interactions between causes.
All we have are computer models which attempt to predict global temperatures but which have NEVER been validated by showing that the empirical evidence agrees with the output of those computer models. Science relies on an empirical data to confirm (or refute) a hypothesis. To date, I have not seen empirical data to substantiate the hypothesis that man-made CO2 is the dominant cause of a rise in global temperatures.
In fact, empirical measurements of CO2 concentrations, regardless of whether man-made or not, have risen over the past few decades while empirical temperature measurements have remained essentially flat. This is not predicted by the computer models and indicates that some factors other than man-made CO2 is dominant.
Bottom line, the hypothesis that man-made CO2 is a dominant cause of increases in global temperatures is FAR from being verified by empirical data.
Research activities aimed at understanding the complex global climate change is warranted but, to date, it is in its infancy and far from conclusive as to the magnitude to which man-caused CO2 plays a role.
22 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/10/2019 9:56:50 PM (No. 29800)
Well Occasionally- Cognizantmight be factually wrong, but because she ´feels´ right, global warming must be true.
s/o
18 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DVC 4/10/2019 10:09:07 PM (No. 29829)
Actually, #7, if you mean man made CO2 emmissions, I totally disagree with your premise. There is absolutely ZERO actual science behind that assertion.
You are being played for a sucker, and are passing along misinformation as if it were a proven scientific fact. It is NOT.
20 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 4/10/2019 10:20:51 PM (No. 29817)
Yeah, but, when Chicken Little (AFTB) says the sky will fall in 12 years, will we be Ducky Lucky or Henny Penny? I´m betting on Foxy Loxy. Look it up.
14 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue 4/10/2019 10:27:35 PM (No. 29832)
I support global warming .... cuz nothing grows in ice. PERIOD!
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Salt5792 4/10/2019 10:30:20 PM (No. 29831)
Human activity has no effect on global climate.
10 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 4/10/2019 11:42:25 PM (No. 29794)
If oceans are rising, the real estate along the Coast should be dropping since it won´t be worth much under water in 80 years, as they say.
What this is all about is POLLUTION.
They are using the CO2, and scare tactics, to get people to believe, and to react.
They needed to the false number of 97% scientist figure out there so they could use it as "proof" to add gravitas to their claims.
14 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Vesicant 4/11/2019 12:25:21 AM (No. 29804)
Yeah, no. This is the kind of thing that gives conservatives a bad name. By this logic, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were hit by a meteor.
12 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
leonardo 4/11/2019 2:52:41 AM (No. 29792)
The Left needs manufactured lies to obfuscate their obsession with the control of America. So Trump will be “guilty” no matter how many investigations occur, global warming hoax will continue despite scientific method proof, and there’s no emergency at the border, and Kavanaugh is a rapist. The Left and their media liars will keep you thinking and voting just how they want.
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
leonardo 4/11/2019 2:53:55 AM (No. 29813)
That should read NO scientific merthod proof.
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Marjbaldwin 4/11/2019 6:58:56 AM (No. 29814)
The Left already knows it´s a hoax. What they want is not to "save the planet" but to force hoaxes upon us in order to destroy us. The science on that is settled.
14 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Paperpuncher 4/11/2019 8:08:55 AM (No. 29827)
Actually kids, the Sun is going into a phase of very low sun spot activity. It is much more likely we will see some global cooling due to this.
Do not underestimate the power of the Sun! It has more impact on our climate than any other factor.
10 people like this.
This was never a scientific concern. It has been a tool to scare the masses into increasing the role of a global government. If you can make rich countries like the U.S. pay a fine for their damage and get all world citizens on the same level, the elite club could take over.
17 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
udanja99 4/11/2019 8:37:01 AM (No. 29824)
I would like one of these scientists to explain exactly what is the perfect temperature for any particular place on earth and on earth as a whole. And I’d like to be presented with proof and also the time when that particular temperature existed.
Also, I’d like an answer to this - if we can destroy the planet just living our day to day lives, why didn’t the atomic bomb testing in the 40’s and 50’s, the bombs dropped on Japan, Saddam’s burning oil fields and the volcanic eruption in Iceland a few years ago cause climactic catastrophe?
The earth heals itself and adapts. We are just ants swarming around on her surface.
11 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Hermoine 4/11/2019 8:57:54 AM (No. 29801)
The worst thing about the global warming hoax is that so much money has been wasted on it when it could´ve been spent on legitimate environmental issues like the horrible amount of pollution that takes place in Southeast Asia -- and the Phillippines in particular. Their levels of pollution really are affecting oceanic life that is vital to their part of the world. And, let´s not even get started with India and Africa. Our resources could be well spent in educating and helping those parts of the world, instead we´re wasting funds to battle "carbon emissions".
13 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Mulhaven 4/11/2019 9:18:47 AM (No. 29819)
Actually the rise in CO2 follows, not proceeds, the rise in temperature. There is a correlation. But, so what? Humans are incapable of affecting the weather. However, they could destroy themselves. The earth will continue to survive as it always has, with or without humans. If humans are eliminated it will have nothing to do with their changing the weather.
11 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/11/2019 9:43:38 AM (No. 29797)
I knew it was a hoax when their "model" didn´t take into consideration something as simple as solar, or volcanic activity. Each of which can heat or cool the planet through simple physics.
10 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Clinger 4/11/2019 10:02:36 AM (No. 29811)
This article covers only one aspect of demonstrating the hoax by presenting a scientifically sound alternative perspective.
The arguement is missing the litany of examples where the alarmists have been proven to have been outright frauds by faking data. East Anglia comes to mind off the top of my head, but there are other examples.
The falsehoods have infected the minds of even the skeptics who grasp that we shouldn´t surrender our sovereignty to the new world communist order but still say things like it isn´t that bad, a degree or few tenths of warming could actually be good.
It is 100% BS in the current construct. An honest examination to explore the potential for humankind to screw with the climate has never been performed and can´t currently happen because the jury pool has been tainted.
We might just as well study how we are melting Pluto.
9 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 4/11/2019 10:15:25 AM (No. 29823)
Very good article, but, it ignored some key points:
1. Carbon dioxide has no heat retaining capacity and is not a so-called greenhouse gas.
2. The geomagnetic north and south poles have been moving significantly over the past several decades and does in fact impact weather patterns.
3. Temperatures in the upper atmosphere have not changed.
4. Sunspot activity over the past 50+ years has increased and the ensuing magnetic storms on the planet earth have an impact over cloud formation. Yes, the sun has been having a bad hair day.
While we should always be responsible in our consuming ways, the warming crowd needs to go away and take their hoax with them. As for you, Algore, go back to your porn movie career and leave us alone.
10 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 4/11/2019 10:22:41 AM (No. 29830)
I am thankful for the great article, and because I could, I heard it read to me when I clicked on the orange arrow. Furthermore, if Global Warming were NOT a hoax, then the liberal, progressive Democrats would not even be talking about it--much less touting it. It is the latest money laundering scheme.
8 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Mulhaven 4/11/2019 10:25:16 AM (No. 29807)
If a few degrees change in the "average" earth temperature will kill off mankind. How do the global warming fanatics explain the existence of Eskimos and Bedouins??
11 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
lennon47 4/11/2019 10:30:22 AM (No. 29809)
The liberals are arrogant to think man is capable of influencing the action of the planet.
7 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
KatieJo 4/11/2019 10:38:48 AM (No. 29821)
Let me first say that I am 200% on board with the fact that global warming is a hoax. Having said that, I must point out, as a believer in the Bible--that the earth is not millions of years old. It is roughly 6000 years old. How can we determine the CO2 levels of the earth long before it existed?
9 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Faithfully 4/11/2019 10:44:27 AM (No. 29791)
Along the coast of England and Wales there are villages underwater for over a thousand years. The planet is on a schedule, it knows what it is doing.
8 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/11/2019 10:57:48 AM (No. 29816)
As long as there is a buck to be made from the hoax, it will persist. I just watched a documentary on the ice shelf melting around Antarctica (BBC of course) and the predicted rise in the ocean in the range of seven or eight meters that will soon follow. There was the usual shot of penguins mating in crowded conditions. The beachfront homes in Florida have not yet washed away and I suspect they won´t but the fear has been planted. Scientists were paid to travel to Antarctica and the film company was paid to film ice. They cleverly neglected to mention that the ice caps elsewhere have grown by five percent in the last forty years so it balances out.
7 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Jobe 4/11/2019 11:26:35 AM (No. 29825)
If you think that fact, truth, and scientific proof positive will disabuse these liberal toilet seats from pushing their "gospel" of destruction, you don´t know liberals.
5 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
kono 4/11/2019 11:54:46 AM (No. 29803)
In the interest of better understanding the insanity afflicting our ideological adversaries, #27, note that the Warmers aren´t asserting that the couple of degrees of warming will kill people directly, but that the effects on the water cycle and food chain that will draw all people in the world into a sort of global Hunger Games (without the reality-tv-like coverage) and unleash a host of pandemics from diseases that weren´t threats before.
I still think it´s a steaming pile of crap, but the hoax will never go away when we´re "shooting it down" by aiming our weapons of truth in directions other than where their dangerous claims are.
6 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Zarin 4/11/2019 2:03:47 PM (No. 29806)
C02 is plant food. Look up Ferenc Miskolczi who worked for NASA in the early 2000´s. He showed that the equations used for measuring the Green House effect were faulty. This is the Milne Equation - it was plugged into a model & calculated by a super computer - it showed an ever rising out of control heating effect. Like what Al gore was all het up about! Miskolczi changed one factor - depth of atmosphere (which in the Milne equation was "infinity") - he ran the calculations and came up with a solid predictive model. He showed his NASA boss and was told NASA was not interested.
9 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
snakeoil 4/11/2019 4:49:50 PM (No. 29810)
Have lost track of the number of times we have been told The Sky is Falling. The Population Bomb. The Hole in the Ozone Layer. The Silent Spring. The Killer Bees. Nuclear Winter. And now Climate Change aka Global Warming. Climate Change is a meaningless term. The climate is always changing. Why am I a skeptic? First, much of the climate disaster predictions are based on computer simulations. The accuracy of any computer simulation depends on the model being used. And the models being used are woefully inadequate because their predictions don´t agree with the climate data. Second, the prophets of climate doom don´t practice what they preach. They fly all over the Earth in planes spewing CO2 into the atmosphere. It´s like being lectured on temperance by a preacher with a flask in his back pocket. Third, the predictions made by the spin doctors have been spectacularly wrong. A little over 10 years ago The Gorbot predicted that in 10 years there would be no ice in the north polar regions. Instead of being ridiculed he was invited by The Weather Channel to tell us peons to go green. The best thing ever written on the topic is
http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Crichton2003.pdf
by Michael Crichton who stated you can´t disprove Global Warming because it´s not science. It´s a religion. One that I want no part of.
7 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Madinmaryland 4/11/2019 5:08:44 PM (No. 29808)
Good article. But not at all surprising to me. When one studies the formation of our solar system, you actually learn something. Our earth has changed dramatically over the billions of years. Greenland was named that for a reason. The human race is not capable of destroying our planet. The sun is the most powerful planet in our solar system as it relates to Earth´s climate. And don´t forgot about God. It was all His plan, anyway.
5 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Madinmaryland 4/11/2019 5:10:38 PM (No. 29826)
One more thing...And to think that the Cardinals in the Vatican believe "Global Warming" is more important than the sex abuse crisis is a real jaw-dropper. Stupid men.
3 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
fairplay 4/11/2019 5:18:52 PM (No. 29815)
It should be 110 degrees every Summer by now!
4 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Dino Sayer 4/11/2019 5:32:01 PM (No. 29802)
Well, actually I DO dispute the idea that CO2 contributes to warming the atmosphere.
There just isn´t enough CO2 to make a difference. The increase is one molecule in ten thousand. That is 1% - of 1%.
That is one penny, from one hundred dollars in pennies.
There is nothing you can do to that one molecule, to make it heat the other 9,999 molecules to a measurable degree.
Nothing. Nada. Zip.
Real scientists know this.
Manmade global warming thru CO2 increases is bovine excrement.
It is immoral to use these lies as an excuse to raise the costs of energy for the poor of the world (and the rest of us). You are making babies freeze in the dark. Shame shame shame shame shame on you.
6 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
wilmo 4/11/2019 5:41:11 PM (No. 29818)
The despicable Al Gore made millions by promoting this scam/lie and should be jailed for inventing the hoax solely to line his greedy paws.
4 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
rytwng 4/12/2019 6:03:42 PM (No. 29822)
Global warming would be cool. I´m tired of living in a refrigerator every winter. Bring it on.
8 people like this.
Comments:
Fascinating article...