Supreme Court allows Trump administration
to implement widespread Education Department layoffs
NBC News,
by
Lawrence Hurley
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
7/14/2025 4:44:24 PM
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to move ahead with plans to carry out mass layoffs at the Department of Education that were blocked by a federal judge.
The conservative-majority court, without any explanation, granted an emergency application from the administration that blocks the federal judge's ruling. The court's three liberal members objected, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing a blistering dissenting opinion.
"When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary’s duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it," she wrote.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
WWIIDaughter 7/14/2025 4:49:21 PM (No. 1977485)
Not tired of winning...Tired of Bondi talking...
16 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Dreadnought 7/14/2025 4:50:16 PM (No. 1977487)
Or, as the NY Times puts it....
"Supreme Court Allows Trump to Dismantle the Education Department
In a major victory for the Trump administration, the decision allows thousands of employees to be fired, functionally eliminating the agency."
34 people like this.
Biased headline writer…should be “…affirms executive branch authority”
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 7/14/2025 5:05:45 PM (No. 1977492)
How can we have so many "Federal Judges" named Walla Walla Ding-Dong?
34 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 7/14/2025 5:07:21 PM (No. 1977493)
Reading through the article to see what they objected to, you see that Sonia Sotomayor's opinion is just that, and opinion. She did not stipulate what law the Executive was trying to break.
In Leticia James' comments, she merely speculated that there was no plan or there wouldn't be sufficient numbers of people left to do the job.
What they both outlined is they are only interested in protecting government jobs not worried if the government does not have sufficient funds to pay for the expanding government workforce without constantly borrowing hundreds of billions of dollars EVERY year.
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
thefield 7/14/2025 5:12:39 PM (No. 1977494)
#4 the answer is easy. It is walla walla ding ding Joe Biden or the auto pen selecting for him
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Californian 7/14/2025 5:54:52 PM (No. 1977501)
Too late for my kid to avoid being drowned in woke trans garbage but should help the next generation.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Northcross 7/14/2025 6:03:34 PM (No. 1977506)
Please don't worry about the terminated employees. Plenty of jobs are opening up in home construction, housekeeping, landscaping, chicken plucking, and fruit and vegetable harvesting.
33 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Omen55 7/14/2025 6:05:32 PM (No. 1977507)
The smart lawyers know what coming & it's the end for ED.
17 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
udanja99 7/14/2025 6:36:29 PM (No. 1977520)
#7, home school.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
chance_232 7/14/2025 6:44:51 PM (No. 1977525)
Re#8. Don't forget coding.
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 7/14/2025 7:03:52 PM (No. 1977539)
All of them would be a good start.
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Birddog 7/14/2025 7:04:10 PM (No. 1977541)
This is the, what...14th, 15th consecutive case where the Supreme courts have ruled that the challenges against Trump are in fact "Unconstitutional"? He is, and always has been in the "Right", this is the kind of thing where "Loser pays" should be enforced.
15 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Bogasso 7/14/2025 7:44:50 PM (No. 1977559)
Careers for former teachers? The most seamless transition for them would be “sex worker”, which is what they were turning “teacher” into anyway.
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 7/14/2025 9:45:19 PM (No. 1977603)
"Allows" is lie, typical Enemedia crap.
10 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Californian 7/14/2025 9:47:59 PM (No. 1977605)
10, no need to home school. I parent. My kid knows what a woman is, knows men can't get pregnant, and so on.
8 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 7/15/2025 5:23:43 AM (No. 1977638)
In effect the Supreme Court to Trump: "Hey, it's OK, no one really likes the Department of Education... fire away!"
8 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
5 handicap 7/15/2025 6:38:23 AM (No. 1977653)
It's none of the Judiciary's Damned Business! He should tell em so!
8 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/15/2025 7:47:11 AM (No. 1977677)
The problem with the education department is that thousands of them passed through the modern public school system so they know nothing about real education. I went through it when teachers cared what you learned of the core subjects and didn't care what your sexual, racial and political throughts were and what your mother fed you for breakfast. When you misbehaved you knew that the "board of education" was going to come off its hook on the wall. Schools today are mini circuses with with monkeys and clowns a-plenty running the show. The Wide Latina is dead wrong, as usual. KBJ doesn't know how to spell well enough to write her own opinion.
11 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Kafka2 7/15/2025 8:46:31 AM (No. 1977716)
I have heard that the Education Department is responsible for funding a lot of the indoctrination in extreme left ideology in the schools. If this true, it should be named the Indoctrination Department. We don’t need children’s innocent minds filled with extreme ideology when they should be learning to read, write and do math.
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Zigrid 7/15/2025 9:20:46 AM (No. 1977736)
Not sure what you mean...poster #1...I only heard Bondi talk one time...at the meeting of department heads with President Trump....when you follow a leader...you don't question him when you're going up a hill...thank you President Theodore Roosevelt..."Charge".....do I instinctively know something is being held back from WE the people....for what reason...I don't know...and quite frankly I don't care...the driveby media trying to exploit the story...or lack thereof...means nothing to me....
2 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/15/2025 10:31:34 AM (No. 1977774)
Trump needs to Delete the Teachers Unions, for CHILD ABUSE, the evidence is everywhere!
Then to put a cherry on top of the action, Delete ALL Public Sector Unions!
All they are is a money slush fund that pays the Democraps for all their ILLEGAL actions!
THEN Confiscate all the money of anyone giving money to the Rioters...Send Soros to Hungary, they will DELETE HIM!
THEN sit back and watch the Media and Democraps go more nuts than they already are.
THEN cancel all the Leftists FCC Licenses to broadcast, and for icing on top of the cake Deny
all leftist media's use of any govt. regulated service, Internet, Satellites, Telecom, SHUT THEM ALL DOWN!
2 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 7/15/2025 10:56:22 AM (No. 1977785)
Supreme Court Allows? President Trump has the constitutional right as the Head of the Executive Branch.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 7/15/2025 1:32:11 PM (No. 1977837)
So now the Executive branch needs permission from the Judiciary to do anything????
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 7/15/2025 2:56:10 PM (No. 1977861)
Education Department was fine before the Communistas took over. Glad the dismantle has begun.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)