Dems Find Second Judge To Block More Of
Trump’s Order Enforcing Election Law
The Federalist,
by
Beth Brelje
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
6/15/2025 10:18:05 AM
After a U.S. district court judge barred parts of Donald Trump’s election integrity executive order in April, a coalition of 19 Democrat attorneys general found a second district court judge to block other crucial provisions of the order. Along with the requirement of proof of citizenship to register to vote, these provisions include measures that strengthen security protections for overseas voting and ensure that ballots meet an Election Day deadline instead of straggling in for weeks on end.
By law, only U.S. citizens are allowed to vote in federal elections. But left-leaning Massachusetts Judge Denise J. Casper ruled on Friday that wannabe voters should not have to prove they are citizens
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 6/15/2025 10:27:34 AM (No. 1964539)
These things will likely require Congress to act and there seem to be too many members of Congress who LIKE election fraud to want to change it.
36 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 6/15/2025 10:40:56 AM (No. 1964549)
If these jerks weren't sitting on a court bench, they would be marching in a 'peaceful protest' wearing a mask and being anything but peaceful. Welcome to the era of on an activist judiciary.
32 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Kafka2 6/15/2025 11:38:26 AM (No. 1964580)
I have no desire to have illegal drug pushers, rapist, murders and other criminals vote in our elections. But, that is exactly what these judges are enabling by blocking the requirement to prove US citizenship to vote. Remember, at least two of the 9-11 terrorists were registered to vote thanks to sloppy implementation of motor-voter legislation. How many illegals voted in the last election?
24 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 6/15/2025 11:44:37 AM (No. 1964583)
Besides the obvious, glaring issue judicial overreach, I'm wondering what legitimate judicial needs are going unmet as these TDS judges and DAs are obsessing over their illegal, unconstitutional efforts to undermine DJT?
you know, the needs that created these judicial positions in the first place.
It sure wasn't the partisan judicial activism on which they've been hyper-focused for the last three months.
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
FJB 2022 23 24 6/15/2025 11:56:48 AM (No. 1964587)
The Supreme Court may as well be abolished since they are never going to get off their asses and do something about these district judges who think they have total power over the president!
31 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
chagrined 6/15/2025 12:05:58 PM (No. 1964592)
You're right, poster #1. Congress is about as apt to pass term limits on themselves as they are to pass something to ensure only American citizens vote in our elections.
21 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
billa57 6/15/2025 12:10:48 PM (No. 1964594)
If there is one thing dems know its honest elections mean their end. They will do everything they can to keep their crooked elections going everywhere. It's do or die with them.
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
chumley 6/15/2025 12:27:39 PM (No. 1964603)
These judges must be making a mint in bribe money. I guess it beats doing honest work for your retirement.
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
hershey 6/15/2025 2:39:33 PM (No. 1964642)
There is not much more evil on this earth than a liberal with TDS....
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
nwcudagal 6/15/2025 7:25:50 PM (No. 1964705)
How does a "judge" circumvent our Constitution?
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Msquared112 6/15/2025 8:59:40 PM (No. 1964727)
This must change. You can’t have district judges standing in the way of a POTUS. It’s bizarre.
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
cor-vet 6/15/2025 11:14:10 PM (No. 1964754)
It's time for the Preident to start ignoring these judges. Maybe if these judges start complaining because they're not being obeyed, the supremes will finally take it up or, miracle of miracles, congress will actually do something!
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
anniebc 6/16/2025 4:11:35 AM (No. 1964799)
The same 19 devilcrat attorneys general signing off on everything. Where's the coalition of PUB AGs fixing what dem AGs are trying to tear up?
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Krause 6/16/2025 7:26:03 AM (No. 1964861)
Dems have an army of robed saboteurs ruling against the will of the people.
5 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 6/16/2025 9:04:51 AM (No. 1964911)
Insurrectionist!
... Democrat in Black Robe
... Eminence Noíre
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Zigrid 6/16/2025 10:01:34 AM (No. 1964937)
Okay folks...I'm sure pam Bondi has some plans of her own...so let's not jump the gun....let's just wait and see....democrats win elections because they cheat...and President Trump has made that a little bit more difficult....WE need to remember..."to big...to rig"....as far as congress goes...it's all politics on both sides...what can you do for me if I vote to pass it....which of my friends can have a government job with this legislation.....which guarantees a kick back to the legislator....
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
moebellini3 6/16/2025 10:19:55 AM (No. 1964953)
Does anybody know where the supreme court is. Didn't think so. And this is for voting. Proves once again how much democrats cheat. Scum.
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Roberto 6/16/2025 12:21:27 PM (No. 1965056)
There are 677 authorized federal district judgeships in the United States across the 94 federal district courts. Apparently each and every one of them thinks they have the authority to hold up the policies of the executive Branch indefinitely.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 6/16/2025 5:23:18 PM (No. 1965195)
"Cause he is a Dem!"
Can't be!!!!
Don't you remember The Honorable Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court lecturing us ignorant peasants that there is no such thing as a Democrat judge, that they are all non-partisan wise men and wise women beyond reproach???
0 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Daisymay 6/17/2025 8:29:36 AM (No. 1965411)
I agree that the Supreme Court should have stepped in, long ago, and put a stop to this shameful maneuver the Judges are using. We are allowing the Supreme Court to sit by and do nothing (probably because Judge John is getting paid a pretty load of money to allow it)! I think Trump should just ignore all of those Judges who think They are President, and go about his business. If they want to take him to court or put him in Jail, bring it! At least this mess with Rogue Judges will have to be settled! The Supreme Court will have to FINALLY do their Job!!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)