About Those Three Bizarre Media Retractions
in the Paul Pelosi Story
Breitbart Politics,
by
John Nolte
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
11/5/2022 5:40:20 PM
Over the past week or so, the corporate media have retracted three stories inconvenient to the Paul Pelosi narrative.
Moreover, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins refuses to release any video associated with the alleged assault on Mr. Pelosi. We won’t even be allowed to hear the 911 call.
“For us, revealing that evidence through the media is just not what we think is appropriate,” the Democrat DA told CNNLOL last week. “We want to make sure that this individual is held accountable for these egregious acts. For us, we’re going to make sure that we limit the evidence as much as possible in order to get that done.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
downnout 11/5/2022 5:51:31 PM (No. 1325621)
But what about the peoples right to know?!? You liberals screeched that for years. Now one of your own is caught with his pants down and it’s cover-up time. Release the tapes!
31 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Birddog 11/5/2022 6:03:50 PM (No. 1325628)
They don't want to "Jeopardize the Prosecution by releasing evidence"...but they LITERALLY caught him Red Handed, and on camera attacking peloisi with the hammer, it is a slam dunk case...he has already admitted that he planned, gathered gear, went there and broke in...it wasn't until he got an appointed Lawyer that his "Yeah I did it, and no I don't mind telling you alllll about it without a Lawyer" ....to a "Not Guilty" plea. The only "Not Guilty" outcome will be if he is adjudicated Insane.
(I for one would like to see a "Guilty but Insane" option...one that allows life/lonnnng sentences, but to be served in...perhaps...a different Prison environment, and see that option used for a LOT of these constant criminal 'homeless' cases)
8 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Omen55 11/5/2022 6:05:05 PM (No. 1325630)
Don't be surprised if DePape commits suicide.
After all who knows what he would say at trial?
24 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Jesse Jenkem 11/5/2022 6:34:03 PM (No. 1325644)
I think we all have a pretty good idea what was happening there.
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Kutchk 11/5/2022 6:42:54 PM (No. 1325652)
These things I know;
1. Epstein did not commit suicide
2. Depape was invited to the Pelosi home.
34 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
athina 11/5/2022 6:48:43 PM (No. 1325657)
Agree with the whole thrust of this article but i’m confused about one thing —
He says that Pelosi is reported to have said ‘everything’s good’ but the actual quote says the defendant said it. It’s an odd word here — did they mean the victim or defendant as in the one being charged in a court case? The quote was from court documents.
5 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
stablemoney 11/5/2022 6:54:55 PM (No. 1325661)
The police will gather and shield all the evidence from the public. A settlement will be reached with the defendant, and there will never be any court proceedings. Everything will be sealed for 75 years.
13 people like this.
Last thing the dems want is this guy going to trial. I think IMO they are trying to figure out how to Epstein him and get away with it.
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 11/5/2022 7:02:59 PM (No. 1325670)
Isn't the prosecution obligated - - by law - - to turn over all their evidence to the defense?
And - - will they ever allow the drug-addicted, psychotic, hippie nudist to have a defense? My guess is - - he'll be treated like the January 6 defendants - - thrown into an isolated cell - - and kept away from the public - - including any attorney who tries to represent him.
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
lakerman1 11/5/2022 7:06:44 PM (No. 1325673)
Here is something that no one has talked about.
When the police are on a call that could represent any kind of domestic abuse, the first thing they do is separate the two individuals, even if one is saying 'everything's good.'
Or did the police do that, and perhaps based on other calls fom Paul Pelosi, felt that it was a lover's quarrel. Then Paul walked back to DePape, and DePape whacked him with the hammer.
Remember Jeffrey Dahmer? I once took a Violence workshop from a former Milwaukee police officer He said that late in Dahmer's
murder spree, he had kidnapped a Vietnamese teenaged boy, anally raped him, and the naked boy ran down the street, bleeding, and was found by police. They went to Dahmer's home, and Dahmer convinced them that it was a lover's quarrel. And the police, not wanting to look homophobic, beleived Dahmer and did nothing.
The San Francisco police, operating in the center of homosexuality, probably have been on lots of such calls.
17 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 11/5/2022 7:31:35 PM (No. 1325692)
The Cleaners are rewriting the narrative. Facts are being erased, and "new facts" are being ginned up from thin air.
And the Enemedia is assisting.
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
kono 11/5/2022 7:37:31 PM (No. 1325699)
"revealing that evidence through the media is just not what we think is appropriate"
Then release it directly on your department web sites.
Perhaps what she really means is that letting the public see video that would scandalize one of the most powerful Democrats would be inappropriate?
Stinkin' Swamp Creature...
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
singermom9 11/5/2022 7:41:20 PM (No. 1325704)
They are going to PROSECUTE? I thought the idea was to RELEASE ALL the criminals. That's what they do for ALL the rest of Americas victims. Oh wait, this is the crowned Pelosi's. THEIR attackers go to jail. Regular folks attackers are let out to harm again. Get killed, get stabbed, get thrown onto the tracks, get an eye punched out. hey goes with the territory. But attack Paul Pelosi after inviting the criminal in and you are outcast forever and in jail til eternity.
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 11/5/2022 9:09:12 PM (No. 1325747)
I really don’t know what went on with this event but efforts to cover up will backfire. Maybe DePape was just a nutball that wanted to attack anybody in power. If so, I can almost sympathize with him. However, the desperate attempts to spin and cover this up are going to have the opposite effect. If this is a just a simple break-in by a nutter then why the ridiculous attempts to hide the real story? Put out the body cams and the security video. The longer SFPD stonewalls, the worse the story gets.
9 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MickTurn 11/6/2022 12:03:43 AM (No. 1325843)
Two Gay boys fighting to see who's on top...with the hammer!
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
5 handicap 11/6/2022 5:17:58 AM (No. 1325971)
FTA: "For us, we’re going to make sure that we limit the evidence as much as possible in order to get that done.”
Translation: We'll make up the evidence to assure our predetermined outcome.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/6/2022 7:02:52 AM (No. 1326045)
Was there a Great Dane or a goat involved here and were they harmed?
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)