January 6 Committee will seek interview
with Ginni Thomas, sources say
CNN,
by
Jamie Gangel
&
Zachary Cohen
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
3/28/2022 2:07:13 PM
The House Select Committee investigating January 6 will seek an interview with conservative activist Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, according to multiple sources familiar with the investigation.
Most members of the House select committee investigating January 6 -- including chair Bennie Thompson and vice chair Liz Cheney -- believe the panel should interview her, CNN reported earlier Monday.
The committee has had ongoing discussions about Ginni Thomas, and CNN reported last week that it has in its possession 29 text messages that show her pleading with then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Bmoc 3/28/2022 2:08:23 PM (No. 1112508)
Ginny should tell them to pound sand.
37 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Toby Ten Bears 3/28/2022 2:15:40 PM (No. 1112517)
Gather up the January 6th committee and have them all hanged.
36 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
marbles 3/28/2022 2:20:41 PM (No. 1112520)
They want to get Justice Thomas out to swing the court . Despite the squeals of the dems, Ginni did nothing wrong.
40 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 3/28/2022 2:27:25 PM (No. 1112525)
Guilty of expressing opinions on forbidden, unclean thoughts. They'd happily lynch her alongside her conveniently positioned husband, who's the real target anyway. They need her for camouflage.
27 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
starboard 3/28/2022 2:29:00 PM (No. 1112527)
They want to drag this out until November.
21 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MattMusson1 3/28/2022 2:36:03 PM (No. 1112535)
Ginny's emails but not Hunter's hard drive. This is BS.
43 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
billsv 3/28/2022 2:40:01 PM (No. 1112539)
Tar and feathers the committee
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
formerNYer 3/28/2022 2:57:05 PM (No. 1112549)
If I was Ginny I'd go and call them all out one by one.
Ask each of them tell me how slow joe got 81 million votes
Turn the tables Ginny!!!!
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Rich323 3/28/2022 3:08:04 PM (No. 1112564)
She should say I will not testify period until your committee has reviewed the content of Hunter Biden’s Laptop and made the facts public. That is my discovery request.
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 3/28/2022 3:09:10 PM (No. 1112567)
Maybe now that the Supreme Joke's Just-Uses see that their silly rulings can be used against them and their families, they will start ruling based on the Constitution and not their political objectives. Nothing cleanses the unwashed like accountability.
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rama41 3/28/2022 3:15:34 PM (No. 1112573)
My only concern is that this committee's records will suddenly disappear after the election.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 3/28/2022 3:15:57 PM (No. 1112575)
They did a "high tech lynching" of Clarence Thomas at his Senate hearing, so it's only right they extend the lynching to his wife too.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Nimby 3/28/2022 3:19:00 PM (No. 1112578)
Why not interview every person living in the USA?
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jinx 3/28/2022 3:27:06 PM (No. 1112588)
They must be getting extra pay to be on this committee. It will be like the Mueller Investigation which cost us over thirty million dollars and they found nothing. This Committee should be dismantled now; Biden is pushing us into WW111. Investigate him!!!!!
11 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
john56 3/28/2022 3:36:31 PM (No. 1112600)
Maybe the thing to do is for all the targets of the committee to mutually agree to testify before the committee with ONE PRECONDITION. No depositions, just live TV appearances (with counsel). Liberally use the "I can't recall, I don't remember, I'm not a biologist, What difference does it make now" responses. Respond why the Capitol Hill Police who killed Ms. Babbitt (and probably another woman) aren't testifying. Why aren't FBI and other federal agency infiltrators asked to testify?
Probably not the best idea, since there probably are a few extra rat-infested unlit, basement cells available in the DC Gulag that Nancy and her thugs have for all their J6 political prisoners.
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 3/28/2022 4:21:06 PM (No. 1112621)
Apparently, Ginny, or any other person not identifying as a Democrat, is not entitled to offer their opinions or ideas. To challenge the Democrat narrative, or to challenge an election.
And, with the one-sided committee, it really begs the question of what don't they want people to know?
The vigorous fights in many State courts to prevent inspections of the process, chain of custody of ballots, etc.. just adds to the question of "what are they trying to prevent people from learning"?
Well, hopefully, come January 2023, after a major election victory by Republicans, and they take over the House, people may find out more of what a few Democrats like Schiff and Nadler have been up to over the past 5 years.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
The Remnants 3/28/2022 4:42:53 PM (No. 1112627)
Has the January 6 Committee ever interviewed Nancy Pelousi - under oath? They should.
6 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 3/28/2022 4:55:57 PM (No. 1112635)
The House Select Committee is grasping at straws. Virginia Thomas is a supporter of 45. So what she can voice her opinion to 45. She is protected by the 1st Amendment, as are 81 million voters of 45. Ms. Thomas should tell you to GTH. Go ahead HSC make our day, show us that you are the political show trial that we know you are. Your days are numbered. Your time will come. We know who you are.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
earlybird 3/28/2022 4:58:31 PM (No. 1112638)
VDH uses “vainglorious” in his article just posted. It would certainly fit the mad leftists who are driving this January 6 investigation travesty.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
clayusmcret 3/28/2022 6:12:31 PM (No. 1112689)
Ms. Thomas, don't do it. As soon as you do they'll start screaming that your husband MUST now recuse himself or face impeachment.
6 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/28/2022 6:14:07 PM (No. 1112690)
Will the Jan 6 Committee be interviewing every spouse/partner of every official who tweeted or commented about the Jan 6 incident or election results? You never know which other spouses may have been plotting against the nation. Maybe Chasten Buttigieg, Mr. Pelosi, Schumer's wife? What did they say and when did they say it? They may have influenced their spouses votes regarding the election results. Maybe Mr. Pelosi convinced Nancy to deny extra security on Jan 6. We will never know if he is not interviewed.
5 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
danu 3/28/2022 6:59:45 PM (No. 1112715)
High Tech Lynching 2.0 The Damnocrats are filthy Racist Swine.
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Trump Won 3/28/2022 8:03:52 PM (No. 1112748)
Virginia and Clarence Thomas to irrelevant January 6 Committee...GFY.
2 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
mifla 3/29/2022 4:23:22 AM (No. 1112950)
This committee must be paid extra for every person they bring before them.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)