Supreme Court votes 6-3 to BLOCK Biden's
vaccine mandates for private firms in
huge blow to White House COVID plan: 'Disappointed'
Joe will tell businesses to adopt rules
ANYWAY and says it's up to States to 'do
the right thing'
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Elizabeth Elkind
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
1/13/2022 7:24:07 PM
President Biden urged businesses to bring in vaccine mandates on their own and pushed states to 'do the right thing' after the Supreme Court voted 6-3 to block his sweeping rules on private companies in a crushing blow to his pandemic response. The high court did however allow a vaccine mandate for employees at health care facilities receiving federal dollars to go into effect. Twenty-seven states had petitioned the Supreme Court to issue a stay on the rule while it is battled out in the judicial system. It's the latest setback in a devastating 48 hours for Biden,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Chiritwo 1/13/2022 7:35:53 PM (No. 1037814)
Hey, Joe, we do have a Constitution that you swore to uphold. Think it's time to remove him from office. If President Trump had said this, the press would be all over him. What a bunch of hypocrites. No wonder the "news"papers are failing.
29 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
kono 1/13/2022 7:40:28 PM (No. 1037818)
We don't need no steenkin' connsitushun, anyway.
Let's Go Brandon!
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 1/13/2022 7:50:07 PM (No. 1037831)
Disappointed?
People were thinking that the SHTF sometime in April. With people losing their jobs and careers because of the invalid "mandate", it might be February when the SHTF.
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
GustoGrabber 1/13/2022 7:51:19 PM (No. 1037832)
ANYWAYS, the ninth amendment says pretty much that.
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Nashman 1/13/2022 8:18:56 PM (No. 1037856)
Businesses ignore the ruling at their own peril. Without the rule of law, they’re now liable for forced shot after effects. Let the law suits begin, please.
27 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Omen55 1/13/2022 8:33:58 PM (No. 1037868)
Now all those business have to backtrack or employees sue.
15 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
sw penn 1/13/2022 8:58:23 PM (No. 1037888)
Brought to you by the democrat lawyer full employment act...
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
athina 1/13/2022 10:38:47 PM (No. 1037931)
Very disappointing, because it wasn’t decided as a violation of our constitutional rights, it wasn’t even argued as such, but merely because Congress hasn’t passed a law that allows it. Not very hopeful sign against more medical tyranny in the future.
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 1/13/2022 11:41:14 PM (No. 1037965)
Assuming that Biden forced OSHA to issue its vaccine mandate does not mean that Biden or OSHA violated the doctrine of separation of powers under the Constitution. It would probably be a violation of separation of powers by OSHA under the Constitution if OSHA enforces the mandate subsequent to the Court's OSHA decision (which it will not do). After a quick word search, I think the Court's OSHA opinion does not refer to the Constitution and does not include the phrase "separation of powers." Why? Becuse the litigants' attorneys and the justices know this is settled law and thereby need not be mentioned in the Court's opinion. There could be no violation of the separation of powers doctrine until after the Court's opinion because until then it was unknown how the Court would decide the issue; the Court might have upheld the OSHA mandate. Also, the Court's ruling in the OSHA case does not result in any retroactive violation of the separation of powers docrtine.
Separation of powers is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) are kept separate. The Legislative Branch exercises congressional power, the Executive Branch exercises executive power, and the Judicial Branch exercises judicial power. Federal agencies are supposed to exercise only executive power, sometimes they unlawfully exercise congressional power by promulgating rules that are effectively federal laws, such as, for example, criminalizing actions or inactions that are solely the function of Congress. This problem has been the subject of Supreme Court opinions.
2 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 1/14/2022 1:51:39 AM (No. 1038007)
It's the WRONG THING, and it's ILLEGAL. Just stop your insane insistence on a dysfunctional, useless shot that has harmed a LOT of people and killed at least 20,000 according the government's own reporting system numbers.
5 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mifla 1/14/2022 4:35:16 AM (No. 1038065)
Wrong again, Joe. Please retire before you have a complete meltdown on national tv.
1 person likes this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 1/14/2022 6:16:10 AM (No. 1038109)
Re #11
I disagree, we need to see Biden have a MAJOR melt down on national TV, one so bad that not even Don Lemon/Anderson Cooper/Brian(potatohead) Stelter can spin it away. Let's see him yell & foam at the mouth-his time needs to end in the Oval Office sooner than later.
1 person likes this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
anniebc 1/14/2022 6:50:30 AM (No. 1038134)
brandon needs more devastation than this. It's either him or US; I pick him. May his every day squatting in our WH be filled with devastation after devastation, 24/7. Amen.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 1/14/2022 7:04:15 AM (No. 1038146)
My first impulse is to impeach but on the other hand he is a gift that keeps on giving. Even the most brain dead democrat has to begin to see this fool for what he is.
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MickTurn 1/14/2022 11:48:54 AM (No. 1038460)
Time to Hang any CEO's that violate anyone's rights, PERIOD!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)