CDC Changed Definition of ‘Vaccine’
Because of COVID-19 Vaccines: Emails
Epoch Times,
by
Zachary Stieber
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/3/2021 1:20:20 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) altered the definition of “vaccine” because of concern that its definition did not apply to COVID-19 vaccines, according to newly released internal emails.
The agency updated its definition on Sept. 1.
The definition was formerly, “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” It is now, “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
One CDC employee in August, (snip) said that the definition was being used by “right-wing COVID-19 pandemic deniers … to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines,”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
red1066 11/3/2021 1:22:22 PM (No. 966011)
Those nasty right wingers are right.
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 11/3/2021 1:25:29 PM (No. 966013)
I think Merriam-Webster beat them to the punch. Who knew a dictionary is the arbiter of bioscience?
4 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 11/3/2021 1:28:30 PM (No. 966019)
These shots are NOT 'vaccines', and it has been clear from the beginning that they never were.
Gene modification therapy. NOT a vaccine. And far more deadly, even in the short run, than any legitimate vaccines. We have absolutely NO idea what the health affects will be in the long run. Not likely to be good.
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 11/3/2021 1:34:05 PM (No. 966024)
Those nasty right wing nuts were on to the truth so the 'scientist' change to wording around to negate the anti-vaxxer's argument. How neat is that but not unexpected. fjb MAGA
10 people like this.
“A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
So, it's not a virus, but a disease?
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 11/3/2021 1:36:10 PM (No. 966029)
I am not going to take medical advice from an organization (CDC) that believes men can get pregnant and have babies. If that organization is that stupid than you have to wonder what other medical information they give us that is totally wrong.
15 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
paral04 11/3/2021 2:03:41 PM (No. 966073)
So "science" is now what bureaucrats want it to mean not what is correct. Read about this in "Brave New World" by Julian Huxley written over 60 years ago.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Ima dashell 11/3/2021 2:26:05 PM (No. 966103)
The handling of this virus has my head spinning. Poster #7, I think the author of the book is Aldous Huxley.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 11/3/2021 2:41:01 PM (No. 966117)
They are using an experimental therapy.
Nobody knows what all the side effects will be.
The side effects could manifest 15 years from now. A woman gets the 'vaccine', becomes pregnant, and has a child. That child does not exhibit any negative results until hitting puberty 15 years later.
We have never waited that long before rolling out new medicine, but it has NEVER BEEN FORCED ON AN ENTIRE POPULATION BEFORE. Don't they realize they are playing Russian roulette?
What will it takes for the idiots in charge to hit the breaks? Since hundreds of millions have been vaccinated, and likely billions worldwide, it will takes (tens of?) millions of negative results to stop this.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 11/3/2021 2:52:11 PM (No. 966128)
Exactly right, #9. Sexual organ damage is often passed on to the next generation. The drug DES was given to pregnant women for 30 years to help with morning sickness (I think, from memory) and caused those women's daughters to have a high probability of vaginal and cervical cancers.
This totally unknown gene therapy could be just like that - effects delayed in those who took it, and perhaps passed on to their children, not discovered until they are adults.
Giving this to children is absolutely a money-grubbing, mean spirited error. My two nieces who have children have said, literally to me, "Over my dead body!" when I asked about this for their kids in the last month or two.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 11/3/2021 3:09:54 PM (No. 966155)
Of course they did.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
chumley 11/3/2021 3:19:11 PM (No. 966165)
Just one more reason to not believe anything that comes from the government. Not nutritional recommendations, not smoking warnings, not ideal weight charts, not jobs reports, not the cost estimates of various bills, not what is being spent on the various boondoggles, not reports on the various wars they start, nothing. They are pathological liars who would lie if the truth would serve them better.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
columba 11/3/2021 3:41:23 PM (No. 966196)
Tom make sure that the other side loses, one just changes the rules of the game. In this case they changed the definition of the word VACCINE.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MickTurn 11/3/2021 5:04:21 PM (No. 966263)
Well, why not call the Vaccines what they really are...POISON!
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
udanja99 11/3/2021 8:37:30 PM (No. 966471)
So now they are giving it to kids and just yesterday reports came out that they are no longer recommending the jab for pregnant women. How does that work?
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
udanja99 11/3/2021 8:42:56 PM (No. 966476)
#10, you’re thinking of thalidomide. DES was given to prevent miscarriage. My mother took it when carrying me and 30 years later it caused me to lose two babies in utero due to incompetent cervix. It also caused cysts on my Fallopian tubes and benign tumors on my ovaries all of which led to a complete hysterectomy. As you wrote, it causes an increase in the chance of certain cancers in women and an increase in prostate cancer in men.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
DVC 11/4/2021 2:06:17 AM (No. 966646)
Thanks for the clarification #17, and my condolences for your health problems and your loss of two babies. Let's hope they haven't set the stage for a similar long term health disaster for the next generation of children.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
High time. Experimental gene therapy. Not live or killed viruses.