Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried
by Objective Data
American Spectator,
by
David Catron
Original Article
Posted By: Garnet,
11/30/2020 4:59:07 AM
During the weeks following November 3rd, innumerable election experts and statistical analysts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands. A growing body of evidence ranging from straightforward ballot audits to complex quantitative analyses suggests that the tabulation of the votes was characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election. Consequently, a consensus has gradually developed among the auditors of publicly available information released by the states, and it contradicts the narrative promulgated by the Democrats and the media. The more data experts see, the less convinced they are that Biden won.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
OBX Pete 11/30/2020 6:04:40 AM (No. 619748)
When I read that the FBI has become involved in the "investigation" that did it for me. Any incriminating evidence that will prove that there was fraud will be lost (destroyed) never to be seen again.
As far as "recounting" the votes what are they recounting? If they are recounting the votes that they counted originally they will probably get the same result. We need to get rid of the fraudulent votes and THEN count what is left to show that the original was a fraud. With all the dishonest Federal Judges getting in on this whole fiasco it just doesn't look to me.
42 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/30/2020 6:21:07 AM (No. 619753)
The Dems stole this election in a sloppy manner - the theft in 2024 will be undetectable.
25 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Petronius 11/30/2020 6:29:00 AM (No. 619756)
You can be sure the Feebs will be working overtime to destroy any evidence of fraud they can find.
37 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
The Remnants 11/30/2020 6:37:27 AM (No. 619760)
A couple of high school students could do some investigative reporting for their school's paper on free and fair elections and disprove Biden's win. They can use the images of rallies and vote tallies and all. Though the addition of all the data and analytics would bulk it up a bit.
20 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
blueline 11/30/2020 6:58:56 AM (No. 619766)
True, #4. However, the FB 1's will find nothing amiss. Move along now.
The ComeyWray damage is done. Confidence in a used-car salesman ranks higher than a G-man these days.
32 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rinktum 11/30/2020 7:10:50 AM (No. 619768)
The American people are in the midst of a psyops by the media, democrats and elites. They are doing their best to convince us that Joe Biden won this election. However, the facts, evidence and data coming out despite their efforts to censor it, confirm what we suspected on Thursday morning, November 4th. Democrats are attempting to steal the election and believe they can with the media’s assistance change public opinion with their narrative. It’s the same old play they use every time. Do you believe them or your lying eyes?
The big question is will the SCOTUS have the courage to follow the law or will they be influenced by possible circumstances that may arise out of a decision that does not go well for the democrat party. Regardless of how many expert witnesses are put on or what evidence is presented, there are some on the Court who believe it is their duty in their infinite wisdom to step in and sanctimoniously do what they believe is in the best interests of the country. The threat of violence erupting in the country hangs over the court and it could certainly be a determining factor. We have seen Justices take matters in their own hands on very important issues before and this one would be the mother of all decisions. Which will it be, hard evidence of voter fraud or will Justice Roberts ride in on his white steed to save the democrat day? It is disturbing when you actually consider this a possibility, but it is where we are. God help us and give these judges wisdom and the determination to listen to the expert evidence and apply the law.
51 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet 11/30/2020 7:18:42 AM (No. 619771)
I will never believe that biden beat President Trump in a fair and open election. DimocRATS cheat whenever they can but this time they got caught bigtime.
35 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
montwoodcliff 11/30/2020 8:10:15 AM (No. 619803)
And you better believe that the same stuff happened for Obama in 2012. He won with a crap economy. Romney didn’t help himself either. Trust in Trump is still my motto. Has he been wrong yet? Ask yourselves!
28 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Strike3 11/30/2020 8:26:50 AM (No. 619815)
Too many people stirring the pot right now but the fraud is becoming more obvious every day. Once the SC gets involved, the spotlight will be on them and if they do not rule in Trump's favor, their credibility is gone along with the FBI and the entire election system. It doesn't take experts to see what happened.
19 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/30/2020 8:31:59 AM (No. 619818)
“Biden win”.....
Theft
Fraud
Skullduggery
Treason
Felony
Interference
Crime
Unfairness
Scandal
Lies
Cheating
Conspiracy
Stop calling it a “Biden win”
It wasn’t....and everyone KNOWS it wasn’t!
19 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/30/2020 8:36:33 AM (No. 619824)
The judge in GA who ordered that the voting machines not be reset, reversed his order after an hour but has issued a third order for the machines to be frozen and impounded immediately. This means the evidence that they were attempting to erase or have erased will be there. If found, it will immediately prove the case. At least that's what I think as a nonlegal or data expert--just using my common sense. Would that be reasonable doubt or something else?
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Safari Man 11/30/2020 8:49:20 AM (No. 619835)
There is no Legitimacy
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 11/30/2020 9:10:37 AM (No. 619862)
The dims and msm couldn't care less if a biden the cheater presidency is legit or not if he were to be installed. It's all about power and the transformation of Amerika that Obie failed at fulfilling. Surprise surprise.
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/30/2020 9:15:29 AM (No. 619865)
We here are the exception...two-thirds of the country either doesn't care about the outcome, or supports Biden-Harris. "They're all crooks" is a common mantra I hear during my visit to Wisconsin amid the Trump flags and lawn signs.
Since I don't watch Fox or Hannity, I wonder whether ol' Sean is putting his faith in those honest, hardworking agents and techs to clear this all up and bring the culprits to justice. I have zero faith, expecting any evidence to find it's way into that government warehouse next to the Ark of the Covenant.
That's the bad news. I don't see this settled by the courts, who have no right to interfere with the main even: The selection of Electors. That falls to the state legislatures within state law. Will Republican legislatures accept such tainted election results and certify a Biden slate? Or send no one...which leaves it to the House of Representatives to decide. And then whether the UNIPARTY will allow Trump's re-election...or engineer some "January surprise" to occur "in the name of justice."
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 11/30/2020 9:21:04 AM (No. 619873)
I read this sentence twice to be sure I got it: ''...tabulation of the votes was characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election.'' Vote data completed by massage parlor! Who is the Madam? KH?
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
starboard 11/30/2020 9:35:37 AM (No. 619884)
Joe Biden should get no respect for being an accomplice in perpetrating this fraud on the American people and our most precious ideals as a country. He won nothing. In fact, he will go down in history as someone who violated the basic principals we hold dear as a country. The American spirit of this nation will survive but will never forget from this act and he will be ostracized and scorn until his end because of it. Joe Biden is nothing and the Democrat party is dead.
15 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Aud 11/30/2020 9:47:39 AM (No. 619899)
Really a must-read. I feel better after reading the computer security expert’s affidavit. I hope the Supreme Court Justices read it
11 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 11/30/2020 10:04:26 AM (No. 619910)
I am very cautious about reading comments from #14.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Lazyman 11/30/2020 10:42:29 AM (No. 619945)
If the machines can switch votes set them up in court and prove it, Seems simple enough.
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
FormerDem 11/30/2020 11:03:59 AM (No. 619960)
Within the article is a click to an absolutely fascinating report that clarifies the ownership relationships Dominion, Scytl, etc., and how exactly it is both true and false that they are US owned. Also an explanation of how to cheat, and other fascinating stuff. I wish he told us more about the Bolivia and Philippines elections he mentions. (find report at click under the word EXAMINATION in this sentence: Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is by no means the only expert to reach the conclusion that widespread vote-tampering occurred. This examination of the election results,)
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
FormerDem 11/30/2020 11:25:53 AM (No. 619984)
Oops, sorry, Keshavaz-Nia is linked under the word affidavit, not examination.
0 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Harlowe 11/30/2020 2:19:36 PM (No. 620075)
#6- “The big question is will the SCOTUS ...” / Excellent question, in addition to whether or not the SCOTUS would decide to hear a vote fraud case on behalf of President Trump for the glaring attempt to steal the November 3rd election for Joe Biden since at least four of the nine justices must agree to “grant the Petition for Certiorari.”
Justices of the Supreme Court are required to take two oaths before they perform their duties; one is the Constitutional Oath, the other the Judicial Oath.
The Constitutional Oath: “... I will support and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, ...”
The Judicial Oath: “... I will administer JUSTICE WITHOUT RESPECT TO PERSONS ... agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States ...”
Some news sources have indicated that SCOTUS does not want to rule on the November 3rd vote fraud to avoid “choosing a President.” The reality of what is being attempted in stealing the November 3rd victory from President Trump goes beyond a victory for President Trump; the reality is the integrity of this country’s elections as presented in the U. S. Constitution. The ruling necessary is not to award President Trump a rightful victory--it is the preservation of the integrity and legality of this country’s election process. For SCOTUS to refuse to hear a voter fraud case based on the November 3rd presidential election would seem to be a dereliction of duty; the Court is charged with ensuring “that laws and decisions made within the United States are constitutional.” In such deliberations, there should be the component of morality; theft is immoral.
Another consideration for this particular case is the fact that three of the justices were nominated by President Trump to serve on the Court. Based on the Judicial Oath of administering “JUSTICE WITHOUT RESPECT TO PERSONS” strongly suggests that to recuse themselves would be inappropriate, without foundation; the essence of this voter fraud case not President Trump, it is the violation of the Constitution, as well as the infraction and invalidation of votes cast for a presidential candidate in order to steal an election for an opposition party’s presidential candidate.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Garnet"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)