Dinesh D’Souza Asks Some Simple, Albeit
Brutally Obvious, Questions…
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/22/2020 10:29:43 AM
Dinesh D’Souza cuts through some of the chaff and countermeasures deployed by Tucker Carlson and asks a transparently obvious question: Are U.S. ballot counting machines capable of being manipulated? That baseline question is not dependent on any answer within a court or Trump campaign team filing. That question is simply a matter of investigative journalism finding out… but they are disinterested.
If the U.S. uses election machinery that is capable of being manipulated, that alone should initiate a serious line of inquiry about why such a function would even be present. Why would any ballot counting machine even need to have a feature to shift votes or change outcomes?
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 11/22/2020 10:45:15 AM (No. 613259)
I wish Tucker had asked that question, instead of flaming Sidney Powell,
33 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Cindiana 11/22/2020 10:48:34 AM (No. 613261)
Dinesh is my spirit animal. He leads where others fear to go, and does so with a spine of steel, covered with an impenetrable cloak of logic and truth.
39 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
czechlist 11/22/2020 10:56:40 AM (No. 613267)
I lost a lot of respect for Tucker and turned him off when he made those comments. Why would Powell reveal her evidence on national TV so that her opposition could attack it andher witnesses? The evidence will be presented in the courts. Tucker's audience is not some Grand Jury. His arrogance has become unbearable.
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
starboard 11/22/2020 11:03:54 AM (No. 613269)
#2 Perfectly said about Dinesh. When he speaks, I listen to every word. He's a lighthouse that cuts through the fog.
36 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
planetgeo 11/22/2020 11:17:14 AM (No. 613282)
Tucker is getting a little too big for his bowtie. It may be cutting off the oxygen, slowly turning him into a kind of mini-George Will, who also bow-tied himself into blue-ish oblivion.
35 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
davew 11/22/2020 11:17:48 AM (No. 613284)
Why would anyone play blackjack at a casino where the house doesn't have to show you their cards or count the deck to win? Why would anyone play slot machines that change the odds of winning depending on whether you insert a Republican or Democrat players card? Why does a vote tallying machine need to store votes as floating point numbers? What is 1.25 votes mean? Why do the courts ignore stealing votes as a crime unless the numbers are big enough? This is like letting looters off the hook as long as they don't take high ticket items.
The real failure of this election was not suing states early in the year to prevent unsolicited mail-in balloting based on irrational COVID fears. This was the key that opened the door to looting our entire election by ruthless predators and globalist thugs. As Goldfinger said, "Man has achieved miracles in every field of human endeavor, EXCEPT CRIME!". Well, now they can check that one off as well.
22 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Highlander 11/22/2020 11:58:36 AM (No. 613312)
Vote counters should be as dumb as a bank’s money counting machine that can spit out counterfeits while speeding through the count.
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 11/22/2020 12:04:59 PM (No. 613316)
Tucker is more concerned with his ratings and ego than he is the future of our great nation. He needs to be voted off the island by those who used to watch his show. I know I will never trust him again. That goes for Ingraham and the rest of the Faux talking heads. Only thing I watch is Gutfeld on the weekends. I now have Newsmax on my Roku and could not be happier.
Dinesh had to deal with the nasty harpy named Piaps and her ilk, and I suspect he knows a whole lot more about the Swamp than he wishes he did. I like Dinesh, he asks the hard questions that documentary filmmakers know how to ask.
22 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Peach1 11/22/2020 12:05:25 PM (No. 613318)
We need an Amendment to clearly spell out how our elections are done. There should be ONE nationwide process, PERIOD.
16 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Safari Man 11/22/2020 12:07:00 PM (No. 613319)
D’Souza may be the one person who actually opens my eyes more than Victor Davis Hanson. They are both fantastic. I hope his talents come to bear on this issue as it would give me more confidence we're going to prevail.
27 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Krause 11/22/2020 12:50:44 PM (No. 613350)
Tucker blew it here. You show your 'proof' in court, not blurt it out for all to see ahead of time. An affidavit is acceptable in court as proof, which she sent to Tucker. Did he not know that?
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Vesicant 11/22/2020 1:57:17 PM (No. 613403)
"That question is simply a matter of investigative journalism finding out."
NO NO NO. That is mainstream media thinking. That question is a matter of physical fact. So-called "journalism" has nothing to do with it.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
judy 11/22/2020 2:18:54 PM (No. 613420)
If they really thought they won they would be willing to wait for the court cases & investigations. What's the rush? Sydney had to block Tuckers number he called so many times. I suggest Tucker go after Dominion in the same way he went after Sydney. If Sydney told it all the democrat lawyers would be going ga ga...after all the democrat lawyers will be fighting in court against Trump. One case Rudy said they outnumbered Trumps lawyers 10 to 1...my guess they are doing it for free. I suggest Rudy & Sydney get a PR person & spend their time on the cases.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 11/22/2020 2:28:59 PM (No. 613435)
The machines MUST be seized and the software examined line by line by expert programmers.
There are credible reports that the documentation shows this capability as a feature.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
YorkieMom 11/22/2020 2:53:24 PM (No. 613452)
If we had an honest media they would ask what are the Dems afraid of, if everything is investigated. BTW, Tucker did a 180 on Friday. I think he heard from thousands of people.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 11/22/2020 3:20:56 PM (No. 613466)
Every day that the Trump team delays revealing their evidence is one day less that the democrat machine has to prep their bogus rebuttals.
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
navybrat 11/22/2020 6:42:06 PM (No. 613598)
The Trump lawyers will reveal their evidence in court not on TV. As said before, this is not an episode of Law and Order which can be settled in 50 minutes.
1 person likes this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Zarin 11/22/2020 6:52:11 PM (No. 613607)
The media i.e. the investigative journalists need to do their jobs! We must demand that they do their jobs. The questions:1) Is it not true that the Big Cities [run by Dems] have long & well documented history of election fraud? 2) Is it true or not - that US votes are being tabulated in foreign countries - where there is no one monitoring the counting? 3) Can these voting machines & their software indeed be manipulated? Can they indeed flip votes? -This was documented this last election in Travers City, Michigan. 4) Where are the 100's of affadavits that have been filed? They have indeed been filed - but the MSM is not reporting on them. 5) Where are the whistleblowers - they have indeed spoken. Where is the MSM reports on the whistleblowers? Oh! That is right - you can't have a scandal unless it is reported!
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Penney 11/22/2020 11:05:44 PM (No. 613762)
The press pawns are not called readers for nothing. Thus, pertinent questions are not included.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Pretty basic, I’d say. What judge - even an Obama judge - can say there is no issue there?