Tucker Carlson Unloads On Trump Lawyer
Sidney Powell Over Wild Election Claims:
The Truth Matters
Daily Wire,
by
Ryan Saavedra
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
11/19/2020 9:13:15 PM
Fox News host Tucker Carlson slammed Trump lawyer Sidney Powell during his show on Thursday night for not providing any evidence to substantiate her claims that voting software changed votes from President Donald Trump to Democrat Joe Biden.Carlson said that he repeatedly tried to bring her on the show, offered to give her the entire hour to talk, and that she allegedly became angry and told his show to stop contacting her after they continued to ask for evidence.Video and transcript below:Carlson began: All of which brings us to the bombshell at the center of today’s press conference, that was delivered by former prosecutor Sidney Powell
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 11/19/2020 9:15:55 PM (No. 610992)
OK, that's the end of the line for Tucker....
Looks like Ryan got to him, too.
114 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MaMe2 11/19/2020 9:18:04 PM (No. 610994)
Another one bites the dust
84 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ramona 11/19/2020 9:20:39 PM (No. 610997)
I listened to all of this monologue, sure didn't see this coming. Tucker says he offered a whole hour to Sidney Powell. He is being consistent, unafraid to call people out no matter who they are. I have very mixed feelings about this. Both Tucker and Sidney are people I have come to trust. Guess I'll stop listening to the news for a few weeks.
Ramona (the Pest)
77 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan 11/19/2020 9:25:47 PM (No. 610998)
I never thought Tucker completely escaped the neverTrump realm. I believe Sidney Powell. She cannot release everything now, especially to the press. This is a legal matter that is crucial to our country's future.
117 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chumley 11/19/2020 9:25:49 PM (No. 610999)
Who is Tucker Carlson and where does he work? I dont believe I am familiar with him.
33 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
stablemoney 11/19/2020 9:30:07 PM (No. 611005)
I think Sidney can prove what she says. There hasn't been any presentation in court, Tucker. Keep your pants on.
86 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
66Strat 11/19/2020 9:30:15 PM (No. 611006)
What a hissy fit. He knows damn well Sydney cannot come on his show and preview her case for the corrupt Dems. I will no longer watch him.
94 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
scottj 11/19/2020 9:31:59 PM (No. 611009)
This is why Fox is going down the toilet.
101 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
amylu 11/19/2020 9:35:07 PM (No. 611013)
I've heard Sidney Powell often enough to know she is trustworthy and possesses the evidence she's speaking about. Her reputation is squeaky clean, and she wouldn't be compromising it with false or shaky statements. The other female lawyer was equally convincing in her comments. But then Rudy came on...and it turned into a clown show. He was ranting and shouting at the reporters in a totally unprofessional manner, and he completely destroyed the gravity of the press conference. The hair dye streaming down his face was the last straw. This man should not be allowed near future pressers.
38 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
hurricanegirl 11/19/2020 9:40:04 PM (No. 611017)
I don't watch Clucker . . . I mean Tucker, but is he stupid or what? No attorney is going to "prove" his or her case on a news show prior to presenting evidence in court.
49 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 11/19/2020 9:40:25 PM (No. 611018)
I am hoping Tucker's family has been threatened and he is just protecting them in the only way he can.
Hoping, but far from sure, now.
18 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
4Justice 11/19/2020 9:42:14 PM (No. 611020)
conference was merely an opening statement and the meat of the matter must be worked through the courts. Then, these idiots say they want names of the whistleblowers. Well, Rudy made it clear why he cannot disclose their names. They would be harassed, threatened, etc.
40 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Jesse Jenkem 11/19/2020 9:43:43 PM (No. 611022)
I don't know what Tucker expected, they are not going to give all their evidence away in a press conference, they will give their evidence in court.
62 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
BarryNo 11/19/2020 9:50:29 PM (No. 611026)
He works in New York and I assume he lives nearby. Eastern Police forces cannot be trusted to protect people who conflict with their superiors. Democrats have threatened everyone else on a regular basis. Check the media platforms to see if he and his family have been doxed.
Frankly, this is going to come to a shooting war.
26 people like this.
She said all that's needed this afternoon, that a Dominion company executive can testify under oath as to the whole set-up. What's disconcerting was her also saying that she's done all she can and it will be up to the Government to now pursue the case. We need some key Republican-majority state legislatures to refuse certification of the election results, pronto.
32 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
TJ54 11/19/2020 9:51:52 PM (No. 611029)
By, by bowtie boy
37 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Daisymay 11/19/2020 9:55:41 PM (No. 611034)
And this is why millions have left Fox! For Tucker to trash a Highly Regarded Attorney like Sydney tells me has gotten too big for his Britches!!
51 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Annie Xango 11/19/2020 9:57:11 PM (No. 611037)
well to be fair..Chatsworth Osborne,Jr.'s house was surrounded buy a mob,think at night..with his wife and children terrified inside. at least once..maybe he is scared..unlike Sidney who isn't afraid of anything, I suspect.
21 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 11/19/2020 9:57:33 PM (No. 611038)
Sorry Tucker, but the lawyers build cases without publicity, and they don't need your permission to do so. You just jumped the shark big boy. No more Tucker in my house. You are not worthy to shine Sydney's heels, let alone tell her how to do her job.
54 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
nina584 11/19/2020 9:57:43 PM (No. 611039)
They bought him. I stopped watching Fox Nov 3z I find both OANN and Newsmax very enjoyable and informative. Actually quite pleasant comaoare to the fox mess
34 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
HPmatt 11/19/2020 9:57:56 PM (No. 611040)
I thought Tuckster lives in DC Swamp. Want to say that country club jerk was at a Nova country club.
11 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
pritch 11/19/2020 10:01:55 PM (No. 611044)
Sidney. Tucker. I think I stand with Sidney. Tucker is way out of his league.
42 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
jntsrgn 11/19/2020 10:05:12 PM (No. 611049)
Our President’s lawyers can not continue to say just wait and you will see right up until Biden’s inauguration. It’s well past time put up.
13 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
akudaq 11/19/2020 10:07:18 PM (No. 611055)
Tucker seems quite content where he is, whatever that shows us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRR4uBb8Am4
8 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 11/19/2020 10:09:59 PM (No. 611059)
Tucker was particularly obnoxious this evening. I’m so happy at the emergence of OAN and NewsMax. Without them, I’d have to go back to reading.
36 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Sully 11/19/2020 10:15:50 PM (No. 611065)
C'mon, Tucker. The evidence of massive vote flipping has been in the news since Nov 5 or so via data shots. Powell simply described the research on the machine's capabilities for doing it.
24 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Rama41 11/19/2020 10:20:04 PM (No. 611069)
Louise Gohmert said the other day that the US Army has seized Dominion servers in Germany, supposedly without the knowledge of the FBI. What really bothered me today was Sidney Powell's mention that she doesn't know anything about it. What concerns me isn't Sidney's statement, but the thought that something's going on behind her back -- and ours. Who has the servers and whose side are they on? As for Tucker, I have no problem with what he said but I understand why she wouldn't come on, assuming it's premature to go beyond what she said today. Frankly, we've all been burned too much the last four years to get our hopes up one more time and then have it done again. I'll be patient while the courts look at whatever evidence she has, but, ever the pessimist, I envision a courtroom full of Judge Sullivans.
20 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
janjan 11/19/2020 10:20:58 PM (No. 611070)
Sydney Powell does not make wild claims that she cannot prove and Tucker can’t prove she’s wrong regardless of his opinions. What, he doesn’t think the Democrats are capable of this? Has he been paying any attention to anything? Does he really think a conspiracy of this magnitude isn’t possible? If so he is naively stupid.
29 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 11/19/2020 10:23:21 PM (No. 611074)
Uhm, Tucker, the Defendants' lawyers would love to have all the evidence long before the trial, but the Prosecution (which Trump's lawyers are NOT) doesn't give out all they have. If you want evidence, why don't you wipe the smug off your mug and do a little digging. Project Veritas has several videos on YouTube, and there are also plenty of other confessions and readings of affidavits on video from several people, including the main guy, former Venezuelan military officer, who say with Hugo Chavez and saw what the Dominion software could do and the history behind it. Plus, Dem Senators Warren and Klobuchar both wrote letters of concern about the Electronic Voting Machines being used in the U.S.
As Rudy said, the evidence is all over out there, if you look for it... which the MSM doesn't do. Now I know why Tucker isn't moving to Newsmax.
26 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Kate318 11/19/2020 10:26:46 PM (No. 611077)
Wow. Tucker was most people’s last reason to watch Fox News. Shame.
46 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
greggojo 11/19/2020 10:39:38 PM (No. 611089)
A beginning programmer could write a program that alters the vote totals in favor of any desired candidate. It would only require a few lines of code and those lines could easily be deeply buried in a program, especially, a large and complicated program. (Programming only seems complex to those who've never learned how to do it.)
18 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
TXknitter 11/19/2020 10:40:41 PM (No. 611093)
Please #11, Tucker is quite wealthy and has the means for plenty of security. I like Tucker but he is cleverly keeping his bosses happy while trying to keep his audience. Again, FOX thinks we are stupid and do not see the game.
Read Powell’s career history demonstrating sterling integrity, facing down power and corruption and paying a price. What she is daring to do is so vital to every American. I like Tucker but he has paid no such price. He is a cable news celebrity.
32 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
beca 11/19/2020 10:51:08 PM (No. 611104)
Tucker is wrong.
26 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
beca 11/19/2020 10:52:08 PM (No. 611106)
I believe Sidney
35 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
davew 11/19/2020 10:55:45 PM (No. 611108)
but she never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another, not one.
So here's what data experts have identified from the data streams provided to the media by the vote counting software.
Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total. Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away. The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts. Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th. This resulted in over half a million more votes net going to Biden and 73% of the votes during this timeframe.
These reversing entries look like adjusting entries. Anyone in the accounting profession is aware of entries posted in error that are reversed and replaced with the proper entries and amounts. Why the hell would Virginia need to make these types of entries in their voting system? There really is no logical reason (except for fraud).
Maybe Tucker could have a few of his people talk to the data experts and try to help stop this steal instead of attacking the whistleblowers.
28 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
earlybird 11/19/2020 11:02:12 PM (No. 611112)
She already has said on Fox Business that she never says anything for which she does not have evidence. She just isn’t sharing it with him, giving him a scoop, and risking messing up their court cases.
29 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
billsv 11/19/2020 11:02:59 PM (No. 611113)
This is one time Tucker is wrong. They are still gathering some evidence, second they cannot disclose the evidence until they present it in court, I think Tucker or whoever talked to him about this did not listen closely enough to the press conference.
22 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
earlybird 11/19/2020 11:05:36 PM (No. 611115)
Tucker has had temper tantrums in the past. This is the first in a while. He is not a lawyer. Just a talk show host.
26 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Mauigirl 11/19/2020 11:20:32 PM (No. 611130)
Wonder if the My Pillow Guy will remain a sponsor?
If so, we MUST boycott him.
6 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Newtsche 11/19/2020 11:21:33 PM (No. 611132)
Carlson lost me early on tonight when he said other than Trump supporters, today's press conference was viewed as an "embarrassing clown show" by everyone else.
Not sure what world he's living in now, I know it's not mine. Buh bye, fool.
30 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
Lanetam 11/19/2020 11:23:10 PM (No. 611133)
I am not a lawyer, but even I understand that "the element of surprise" is very important when presenting evidence in a court room. You don't want to give the opposition days or a couple of weeks to lie their way out of a situation.
26 people like this.
Reply 42 - Posted by:
YorkieMom 11/19/2020 11:36:16 PM (No. 611146)
Tucker really disappointed me tonight. I wonder if Tucker’s people were harassing Sidney, and she got tired of it. At least Gutfield made sense. As for Rudy, I don’t think he’s a very good spokesman. I’d rather Sidney do the talking.
24 people like this.
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Gallo3 11/19/2020 11:37:45 PM (No. 611148)
Fredo...You're dead to me now.
15 people like this.
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Anti_democRAT 11/19/2020 11:45:19 PM (No. 611151)
One thing that the georgia recount proves is that vote switching did not occur in georgia because the manual count would have exposed it. My understanding was georgia is all dominion voting machines and software. If they were switching votes they would need to destroy trump ballots and create biden ballots to cover up during the recount. Not likely in my opinion.
4 people like this.
Reply 45 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/19/2020 11:52:46 PM (No. 611155)
Extraordinary claims require at least some tangible proof. Anyone find the promised Kraken under all this stinky stuff yet? That's not to say or suggest blatant thievery did not happen...I believe it did. I would still believe it without all the unfulfilled hype.
4 people like this.
Reply 46 - Posted by:
The Remnants 11/20/2020 12:15:00 AM (No. 611169)
Tucker, please
WATCH - TRUMP CAMPAIGN PRESS CONFERENCE - November 19, 2020 on Brietbart.com - I think it was less than an hour. Watch it more than once. So much content. Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis are trying to give the American people an overview of what is involved in the attempt to steal the election of an American President. It is so complicated and has so many layers, involves so many other countries besides our own, and they are trying to put all those pieces together and give us an overview of what is involved because they love our country and our Constitution and they think the American people have a right to be informed.
As Rudy said, they are trying desperately to get around the wall of censorship put up by the mainstream media. How many of the network news organizations covered the whole press conference?
Watch it Tucker, more than once. Attorney Powell has so many more important things to do right now then to go on your program. Leave her alone to get the job done.
23 people like this.
Reply 47 - Posted by:
Faldo 11/20/2020 12:38:50 AM (No. 611177)
Tucker and his diva-like righteousness...you can have it.
Karl Rove, today was pretty telling also--hee hee
11 people like this.
Talk is never cheap today. I don't care who says what. All I know is it looks like Plugs is going to the WH.
2 people like this.
Reply 49 - Posted by:
Newtsche 11/20/2020 1:37:42 AM (No. 611194)
Yep, #48, at least for a while.
2 people like this.
Reply 50 - Posted by:
NYbob 11/20/2020 1:54:26 AM (No. 611197)
TV host sure think they are hot stuff sometimes and Tucker is the top of that pile. He has made a lot of money by sandbagging morons. Good for him, but he thinks he is a lot smarter than he really is. We will soon see what the truth is, but more importantly we will soon see if the truth matters. We could easily be in a world where the steal is obvious the villains are on the march and then we will submit to the boot or somehow try and fight it, and we know what that means. Will the LEOs fight with us or against us? The rats will claim legitimate law enforcement, even as they destroy the law. IF they win or if no one stops them, each of us has longer and longer odds of see another Christmas. Whatever happens Tucker Carlson won't be leading anyone anywhere.
7 people like this.
Reply 51 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/20/2020 1:57:54 AM (No. 611200)
For a long time here I’ve been afraid that my warnings about that little former cnn bow-tie creep would be taken the wrong way.
He’s one of THEM....
Always has been!
But many considered him required viewing ..
While most of us wrote off FNC long ago.
Better late than never!
Bozos like Rove Perino Cavuto Napolitano Williams Wallace Breem Baier McCallum ..they were always bad news..wimpy lefty eastern wish-washy nerds..
But this Carlson had so many here fooled .
Not me.
Not even Hannity or Ingraham are worth having to stomach FNC..It died.
Newsmax...OANN...Right-Side Broadcast
Four More Years!
It’s coming!
7 people like this.
Reply 52 - Posted by:
watashiyo 11/20/2020 2:06:40 AM (No. 611203)
Me think Tucker got a little Pompous and a little arrogant thinking his audience is yuuge and won't leave him.
Well, he thunk wrong. Hope he can recover and humble himself to engage in damage control. Remeber, his salary is at stake.
8 people like this.
Reply 53 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/20/2020 2:20:13 AM (No. 611210)
I told you guys not to trust Tucker. Powell does not have to make her case to Tucker. He can send out reporters to get the evidence he seeks. Lazy so-called reporters, do your jobs or shut up and wait for the news to come to you.
14 people like this.
Reply 54 - Posted by:
andyboy 11/20/2020 2:36:48 AM (No. 611214)
Tucker would be right to ask when we can expect to see the hard evidence of vote-switching. But he has no right to imply Powell, et al. are frauds just because they won't provide that evidence to him on his timetable. But enough about Tucker. In our house, we now watch Stinchfield.
5 people like this.
Reply 55 - Posted by:
judy 11/20/2020 3:14:12 AM (No. 611218)
For 4 years the Dems have been pushing impeachment, Mueller investigation, hearings hearings hearings against Trump....I don’t recall any Fox so called reporters ever call the Dems ...baseless, clown shows, embarrassing, wild claims.....
11 people like this.
Reply 56 - Posted by:
watashiyo 11/20/2020 4:01:28 AM (No. 611226)
Wow! What Tucker said and did was the "Nail in the Coffin." Hope Gutfield and the other few good ones jump ship before it drags them down the deep end.
10 people like this.
Reply 57 - Posted by:
judy 11/20/2020 6:02:08 AM (No. 611250)
Why won't Fox ask the so called voting machine owners to come forward & explain their process. If the dems are so confident why do they object to audit & recounts?
5 people like this.
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Edgelady 11/20/2020 9:07:51 AM (No. 611374)
I watched it, Tucker and Mark Levin only things I still watch. Tucker is temporary, though.
Is Tucker an attorney? No, has simply a BA. As another article on Lucianne, sworn affidavits are seen as real evidence in courts - anyone expecting DNA or something like that needs to get over it. I’m assuming there’s evidence they don’t want to put out there but what until court. But face it, it will never be enough for Democrats or the press - but I’m being redundant.
2 people like this.
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Hermoine 11/20/2020 10:12:33 AM (No. 611445)
I'm not really sure why anyone is so surprised by this...I had an encounter with Tucker YEARS ago that really soured me on him. He was dishonest and a bit underhanded. I chalked it up to him being a young journalist who was trying to make a name for himself but I've kept my eye on him ever since...and here's my observation -- he's always, ALWAYS, "presented" himself as the smartest guy in the room, and if not the smartest, definitely the most "clever." And, of course, he is above it all -- looking down from his perch. His treatment of Sidney Powell is not astonishing...he wants her to do the work FOR HIM. Present it TO HIM and let HIM be the judge of it's validity. Mind you, this from the guy who lost the Hunter Biden via UPS?! Hmmm? The good news is that Sidney Powell, Rudy Guiliani and Jenna Ellis are REAL attorneys who have done real work and prosecuted and won some extremely challenging cases. Tucker is not only NOT a journalist, but merely an opinion guy who gets to cherry pick the information he wants to use and how to use it. So, don't be too fooled by him...he goes where the wind will take him, astonishingly similar to most politicians.
6 people like this.