When computers cheat, they inevitably leave
evidence behind
American Thinker,
by
Andrea Widburg
Original Article
Posted By: Magnante,
11/12/2020 8:55:30 AM
You should learn three main things from this post: (1) the Supreme Court can consider statistical evidence of fraud and can order a new election. (2) Most of the computers used for voting in America have a built-in mechanism that allows votes to be weighted in favor of a candidate. (3) If someone does tell a computer to mess with the election outcome, the computer's processes will inevitably create unnatural data trails that prove human intervention in vote counts — and that's what happened in three Michigan counties. Correction*
*Please break wide headlines about every six words.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 11/12/2020 9:13:28 AM (No. 603483)
DOJ needs to impound and subpoena the Source Code, and verify what they give them is indeed what was implemented in the machines! They can then have the NSA go through the code line by line and examine how it works.
How can Americans allow a foreign firm to provide our voting machines? Especially such a private company with strong ties to Democrats and the mendacious globalist, George Soros?
28 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bpl40 11/12/2020 9:21:12 AM (No. 603497)
Yes. Computers are not smooth liars like say Bubba or the Kenyan. They are crude like Hillary or Dementia Joe. Shouldn't take long. But the real question - is there enough time? Doing this after a Biden swearing in has no meaning.
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/12/2020 9:30:38 AM (No. 603510)
This is worse than hanging chads. In Florida '00 there was at least physical evidence left by the voter. Here...well, there is a bin full of ballots, but who knows what the coding tells any machine counting them, which is the way most recounts are done. Simply things don't need complication, and the replacement of paper ballots with computer code and readers does exactly that.
The first thing that needs to be done in '21 is to outlaw electronic voting in elections for Federal offices, and to require independent forensic certification of any vote collection/counting code for any other elections. Think it will pass the Democrat House?
8 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
john56 11/12/2020 9:30:54 AM (No. 603511)
Watch for a spike in sales of Bleach-Bit.
"If it Worked for Hillary, It'll Work For You!" -- Bleach Bit Ad Slogan.
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 11/12/2020 9:34:14 AM (No. 603513)
FTA:
"Fourth, almost all voting machines (including Dominion's) are intentionally programmed with something called a "weighted race feature." This allows the computer to add a multiplier to a candidate's actual votes. For example, the machine could automatically multiply every Biden vote by some number over one."
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 11/12/2020 9:48:27 AM (No. 603528)
The all-important question is "What are courts of law, including the SCOTUS, going to do about this obvious, blatant "FU*K YOU REPUBLICSANS!!," wide-spread and massive voter fraud?
If this criminal scam prevails the U.S. has become a nation of cheats, and if this evil is not corrected by a miracle increase of ethics and honesty, we are LOST!
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
davew 11/12/2020 9:49:37 AM (No. 603532)
Zach Vorhies is the former Google tech employee turned whistleblower that has been researching the technical specs for the Dominion system. He has found that the machines have both WiFi and LTE connection capabilities. Even if the WiFi internet connection was disabled they could still be accessed via the cell phone network. It should be possible to subpoena Verizon or T-Mobile network records and check them for connections to the voting machine physical node address.
He found over a dozen exploits that could have been dynamically used to change the way the machine tabulates votes. For example, they specify in their tech manual that their code detects homoglyph errors and removes votes that are impacted. This would occur if the capital letter "i" replaced the lower case "l". By replacing the "Republican" field next to Trump's name with "RepubIican" (capital "i" for 'l") the vote total would be stripped from the tally. Other similar exploits were identified in the Dominion tech manual.
17 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bluefindad 11/12/2020 10:10:51 AM (No. 603555)
If the source code had been updated to facilitate fraud, do you seriously think it would have been left on the machines to be forensically examined?
8 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 11/12/2020 10:43:45 AM (No. 603606)
Yes they do leave evidence behind. Just because you erase something, doesn't mean it goes away. When it is said the internet is forever, it is indeed forever. The FBI and other companies have software that can resurrect anything that has been supposedly erased. Just takes time is all.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 11/12/2020 10:58:06 AM (No. 603619)
#8, you must be a liberal or not very informed about computers. Please refer to post #9. . .
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/12/2020 11:09:19 AM (No. 603636)
Computers don't cheat, democrats do.
12 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 11/12/2020 12:45:51 PM (No. 603760)
Just listened to the entire interview on RedPill with the Dominion contract worker who did a 24 hour shift at the main station in Detroit and filed an affidavit attesting to fraud that went on there. She as been told by her boss at Dominion that they will be doing a significant software upgrade soon and they want her to participate! As I suspected, they're sanitizing the crime scene!
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 11/12/2020 4:16:42 PM (No. 603919)
Stopping the runaway italics. Sorry.
The fact that voting machines have a BUILT IN, DOCUMENTED fraud feature, which makes them explicitly, intentionally, with malice aforethought, capable of switching votes from one candidate to another is difficult to comprehend.
When are they going to arrest the voting machine management for massive criminal vote fraud, planned and carried out?
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)