Rand Paul bashes Trump
anti-eviction action as illegal
Washington Exminer,
by
Nihal Krishan
Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter,
9/4/2020 8:15:39 AM
Libertarian-minded members of Congress, led by Sen. Rand Paul, have come out against the Trump administration's eviction moratorium order, calling it illegal and unconstitutional.
The Trump administration announced an eviction moratorium on Tuesday using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's quarantine authority.
The CDC said in an order released Tuesday evening that it would temporarily stop renters from being evicted until the end of 2020.
"CDC does not have the authority to do this. It’s dangerous precedent and bad policy," said Paul, a Republican from Kentucky who has supported President Trump.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Clinger 9/4/2020 8:24:01 AM (No. 531075)
I'm with Rand. The evil landlords are people too and in many cases less well off than their tenants. There are laws on the books requiring them to do their jobs. Government forces you to provide a service for no pay, I think we have a constitutional amendment that address that concept.
My support for Trump is however, unwavering.
43 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bogeegolf 9/4/2020 8:45:31 AM (No. 531098)
I am also with Rand. I am not a landlord but right now I am stuck with two houses and may have to be. I have seen enough in my contracting career to keep me out of that business.
20 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Sunhan65 9/4/2020 8:54:10 AM (No. 531105)
The problem with Rand is a childish refusal to anticipate the real political consequences of his actions. Attacking the president of his own party in the run-up to a close election over something like this is unnecessary and foolish.
It could have waited. Rand should have.
40 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
24tea@Mag 9/4/2020 9:24:30 AM (No. 531135)
Rand Paul right
5 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 9/4/2020 9:30:37 AM (No. 531140)
Rand Paul is correct. Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads in relevant part as follows: "No State shall . . . pass any . . .Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, . . ."
The government cannot mandate that individuals who (or entities that) do not pay their rent may thereafter continue to occupy the owner's property. The occupants agree to pay the agreed-upon rent or promptly and peacefully vacate the property. These asserted government mandated prohibitions equate to taking property without due process of law.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 9/4/2020 9:41:59 AM (No. 531159)
Rand Paul is right.
Sometimes President Trump goes a bit too far with his "populist" shtik. This isn't "populist" - - it's straight out communist - - and it's definitely Unconstitutional.
11 people like this.
Okay, then let's appropriate the property under the Defense Production Act...worked before and few squawked. How many of those respirators were ever used? I believe the number is...zero.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
felixcat 9/4/2020 10:45:46 AM (No. 531241)
Enough os enough! Working people in this country should not have to continue to carry those not working - for whatever reason. President Trump should not be protecting those people who live in and/or voted for Dem mayors and Governors. Just like the woman involved with Blake in Kenosha - the mother of three of his kid. Her debit card that he stole - that's her EBT card that we fund.
7 people like this.
#3 and agreers, there's a problem with this continual eviction prohibition. The landlords, many of them, are just middle-class folks who have investment property who cannot pay the mortgages on the properties (like a single condo) who are still required to pay the mortgage even when their renters aren't paying them. We know a family who has a renter who they were in the process of evicting for not paying rent before this happened--he hasn't paid rent in about nine months. In the meantime, they still have to pay this mortgage, property taxes, etc. And the law says they can't sell the house out from under the guy either. Nor can they make repairs on their own property and he changed the locks on the place, too. They can do nothing about this. So, they're still responsible for everything about the property while he lives rent free. If this continues, it will bankrupt many small-property owners (like small business owners). They may even lose their primary residences! Not a wise decision on the part of government as they continue to shut down whole industries. But, I assume bankrupting folks is the end goal--usurp their property and make them dependent on the foolish government that "knows what's best for us".
Way to go, Rand Paul and others!!! This provision is wrong and needs to be stopped immediately!!!
MAGA!!! KAG!!! TRUMPS 2020 AND BEYOND! But the administration is wrong on this one!
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
TXknitter 9/4/2020 11:02:40 AM (No. 531260)
I agree with Senator Paul too and I believe most Constitution-loving Trump voters do too. However, #3 is so correct. Trump is doing things now 60 days out from a possible Marxist-run new administration if he doesn’t work his rear off & avoid big mistakes. Trump already has virtually no help in messaging from the profiles in cowardice in the Senate Republican leadership. Trump unshackled from the political restraints of worrying about reelection will be when he can tackle things like this.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/4/2020 11:03:46 AM (No. 531264)
I have to agree with the Kentucky gentleman on this one. The deadbeats of America will take full advantage of this move.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 9/4/2020 11:21:07 AM (No. 531284)
Good move, make Trump seem to be fighting for the little people. This could be all planned. Come on man, rent is still due but may not be easy to collect.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/4/2020 11:44:01 AM (No. 531314)
Paul might be right on this.
Though I understand why Trump is trying it. A lot of people are just starting to recover from this stupid COVID lockdown, and anywhere there is a Democrat governor, mayor, what have you, they are still not even seeing light at the end of their tunnel.
Considering what I know of these areas, the landlords sold out to the Dems ages ago, so Trump certainly didn't hurt himself by trying.
Actually, being kicked out might be the best thing that happened to them, because no one is going to rent in those areas, after this. Dems made them all "Instant Slum-Lords".
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Chuzzles 9/4/2020 11:44:21 AM (No. 531315)
As long as democrat governors are forcing shutdowns in their states, where are Rand's complaints about that? Democrat governors are preventing people from being able to conduct their lives and earn a living, and where are Rand's complaints? No, he chooses to be a self serving coward and attack his president. I agree that if people are making income, they should pay their rent/mortgage. But if they lose their job because of a tyrannical governor, why should they not get some kind of help?
From what I have seen, the help never seems to come for the landlords, and that to me is wrong. Both sides should be helped, and Rand should stop attacking the wrong targets. He is just proving to me that he is not to be trusted or supported. He is only out for himself.
#5, maybe somebody should inform all the democrat governors about that clause, for they are the continuing problem here, not Trump.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Right Time 9/4/2020 1:26:29 PM (No. 531428)
Rand Paul may be right, but the issue is not of such overwhelming importance that it needed to be handled by Rand's publicly challenging his Party's leader 2 moths before an election.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Bill O Rights 9/4/2020 4:34:08 PM (No. 531582)
I agree with Rand Paul on this. Perhaps the CDC could declare a moratorium on the property tax for my rental property. Interest free, of course.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Rand Paul is right. This is like tuition debt forgiveness, punishing those who struggled and paid in favor of those who did not, while also punishing landlords and banks, large and small.