Post New Article

Five Common Misconceptions
About the Electoral College

Original Article

Posted By: shredmaster, 11/29/2019 11:55:07 AM

Two of the nation’s last three presidents won the presidency in the Electoral College, even though they lost the popular vote nationwide. In 2000, Al Gore outpolled George W. Bush by more than 540,000 votes but lost in the Electoral College, 271–266. Sixteen years later, Hillary Clinton tallied almost 3 million more votes than Donald Trump but lost decisively in the Electoral College, 306–232. And, as a recent New York Times poll suggested, the 2020 election could very well again deliver the presidency to the loser of the popular vote.

Comments:

While it appears the author did some deep research, his piece still does not recognize what will result from the direct popular vote, which is dense blue population centers will decide each election, and invariably in the Left's favor of course.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Banjo Willy 11/29/2019 12:01:31 PM (No. 248538)
I know one. I know one ....... it isn't and never will be "electorial" college.
5 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: ROLFNader 11/29/2019 12:06:17 PM (No. 248542)
Imagine the surprise if 2020 is won by both the electoral as well as the popular vote! You might want to buy popcorn on Black Friday.
4 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: ho72 11/29/2019 12:06:43 PM (No. 248543)
It's the Atlantic, so the conclusion was determined before the piece was written. Regardless of the veracity of the author's claims, the EC is all that is keeping us from being trampled underfoot by the population centers. Our "betters" on the coasts care only about securing unbridled governmental authority with which to micromanage every aspect of our lives.
12 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: earlybird 11/29/2019 12:08:18 PM (No. 248546)
I don’t know anyone who has called it the “electorial” college…. I’m for leaving it alone. More than ever.
8 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: bpl40 11/29/2019 12:14:49 PM (No. 248550)
This Lefty professor is barking up the wrong tree. If popular vote is deemed to be the rules of the road, a candidate like Trump will pursue that effectively from the start. These people will still not get the outcome they desire. Moving the goal post is their only option. And they are doing it.
5 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: curious1 11/29/2019 1:08:55 PM (No. 248592)
Democracies commit suicide. Which is why the 17th amendment was a bad step in that direction, as bad as the push to remove the electoral college.
5 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: droopydog 11/29/2019 1:10:48 PM (No. 248594)
I'm is Southern California and NOTHING I vote for (or against) prevails. Election Day 2016 was a busy day for me at work and it was a warm day. There were no Republicans running for Senator. There was no rational reason for me to take the time to go out and vote. Against logic and common sense, I voted anyway. How many in my position in California, New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Massachussetts and Virginia were thinking the same thing and did not vote? If Trump wanted the popular vote, he would have spent more than 50 cents in California. I think I might have seen one commercial probably geared towards contributors. There was a similar situation in 2000. How many people in western states (and the Fla panhandle, in particular) were motivated to vote after the corrupt media called Florida for Gork? The popular vote can be a very distorted statistic.
6 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: kono 11/29/2019 1:17:25 PM (No. 248601)
I've heard it called "electorial college" as many times as "electrical collage" ... i.e. never. Unless the error existed in this article and was corrected before I saw it, I can't even imagine why the comment mentioned it. The issue of large states vs. small states (for which the 'Great Compromise' was crafted) is just as relevant today as it was when the Constitution was written. Contemporary calls to abolish the Electoral College (and even the tweaks being made now to twist it into a popular vote) seem to serve the same oppressive motives as they always have.
4 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: DVC 11/29/2019 1:36:35 PM (No. 248610)
The first sentence proves the writer is an idiot. ALL P\presidents have been "elected in the Electoral College" and NO American presidents have been elected by popular vote. The popular vote is totally, completely, 100% irrelevant to ANYTHING. Only the ignorant and the stupid even discuss this irrelevant topic.
10 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Rumblehog 11/29/2019 1:42:25 PM (No. 248615)
Eclectic collage?
2 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: mean Gene 11/29/2019 1:43:40 PM (No. 248616)
If the Left stopped demonizing "flyover country" and moved into it instead of flocking to the coast states they might win a vote by the Electoral College. But they think we stink. They think flyover people are idiots who they'd rather never rub shoulders with. Obama gave it his wimpy dithering try when he forced an affordable (mixing all races) housing policy on America just before leaving office. It didn't hold up in court. So, I guess no one will force poor dumb Dems into flyover states either.
3 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: jacksin5 11/29/2019 3:08:22 PM (No. 248658)
Imagine if States used the Electoral System for state-wide Elections. Just for example, New York State would likely have a different man sitting in the Governor's Office.
4 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: kennedylaw 11/29/2019 3:20:31 PM (No. 248662)
Obama and Carter are the only Democratic presidential candidates to win more than 50% of the popular vote since LBJ in 1964 (Jimmy Carter makes the list because he won 50.1% of the popular vote in 1976). Before LBJ you have to go back to FDR. Before FDR, you have to go back to Andrew Jackson. Conversely, other than Trump in 2016, every Republican president since Herbert Hoover has won at least one presidential election with more than 53% of the popular vote. There is a good chance that Trump will make that list in 2020 (Bush Jr. won less than half of the popular vote when he was elected to his first term in 2000, but more than 53% when he was re-elected in 2004). Every time the Democrats win an election they think it is a permanent shift of the electorate in their direction. So far, they have always been wrong.
2 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: Banjo Willy 11/29/2019 4:10:27 PM (No. 248683)
Then 'Earlybird' you've not been listening. I forget who but he was a democrat politician
0 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: Lawsy0 11/29/2019 4:44:14 PM (No. 248695)
It's a good idea to read the Atlantic to see which potted palm they are currently hiding behind. (Keep enemies close.) But you shouldn't consider the Atlantic's opinion page as gospel, or even truth.
2 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: tsquare 11/29/2019 4:51:32 PM (No. 248698)
Not all of the votes were counted in the Gore v Bush election. It is not possible to conclude that Gore had more votes...just more counted votes
1 person likes this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: Starboard_side 11/29/2019 5:35:13 PM (No. 248714)
So, if they truly wanted to ensure people were motivated to vote, they would stop allowing winner-take-all in EVERY state. Simply go with the winner of the popular vote in each House district (435 electoral college votes), and allow each Senator (100) to vote as they want (presumably partisan). Now, instead of 5-6 swing states (they call them that because of the EC vote allocation and totals, there would be likely hundreds of swing EC districts open. So, to take #9's comments, how many don't vote because they don't see it will make a difference, or matter, only to know your vote could help allocate your particular EC/House district to your candidate?
0 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: NorthernDog 11/29/2019 6:30:18 PM (No. 248733)
Hey - no problem if you don't like the electoral college. The Founding Fathers were wise enough to allow amending the Constitution. You just need 2/3rds of Congress must approve it, then 75% of the states ratify it. If the people really want it changed then liberals should have no problem using constitutional methods.
1 person likes this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: 4Justice 11/29/2019 6:34:38 PM (No. 248736)
Atlantic=leftist manipulative propaganda rag Btw, the Internet and information availability has not made more informed voters. If anything, it has created more easily manipulated sheeple. The Founders knew the American public needed to delegate decision making when it came to important issues, because the average citizen did not have the time, information, nor level of education to make well-informed decisions on issues of major importance. We were created as a representative republic. We delegate law-making to those we elect. We also delegate the final decision for choosing our executive by proxy. Our Founders never intended our country to be a democracy for many reasons. And yes, one reason is the fear of the tyranny of the majority. If we were a straight democracy, do you think minorities would have been protected and given representation as it occurred? Or is it possible we night not have made many of the strides we made if the majority always ruled?
0 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Shadow722 11/29/2019 7:49:04 PM (No. 248774)
People think only of "major population centers" electing a candidate, it's actually worse. In 2016 Hillary received 4.3 million more votes in California alone. Yet nationwide she "won" the popular vote (which means nothing) by only 2.8 million votes. That means Trump won the other 49 states by a popular vote margin of 1.5 million votes OVER Hillary. Do we really want only one state to decide who is President???
1 person likes this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: NYbob 11/29/2019 11:43:27 PM (No. 248867)
I have nothing but contempt for Atlantic magazine. It seems like everyone there is on a mission to use their talent to twist facts and promote the vilest pack of lies they can imagine. There is NO way an adult can defend abolishing the Electoral College, if they are honest about the subject. They won't admit that they are craven urban elitists who simply want all power and money for themselves. Own up to it Alan. Be a man for once in your life.
0 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: franq 11/30/2019 7:28:09 AM (No. 248968)
Face it, if it was the source of lib victories, there wouldn't even be any discussion. The major population centers™, even just a couple (LA, New York) could determine presidential election results from here to eternity if popular vote was the criterion. No sane person wants that.
0 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: 4poster 11/30/2019 7:10:24 PM (No. 249461)
So, if it is just popular vote, three or four coastal cities would rule over all others. That is not a representative republic. It is two wolves and one sheep voting for what’s for dinner.
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "shredmaster"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by shredmaster"
Five Common Misconceptions
About the Electoral College
23 replies
Posted by shredmaster 11/29/2019 11:55:07 AM Post Reply
Two of the nation’s last three presidents won the presidency in the Electoral College, even though they lost the popular vote nationwide. In 2000, Al Gore outpolled George W. Bush by more than 540,000 votes but lost in the Electoral College, 271–266. Sixteen years later, Hillary Clinton tallied almost 3 million more votes than Donald Trump but lost decisively in the Electoral College, 306–232. And, as a recent New York Times poll suggested, the 2020 election could very well again deliver the presidency to the loser of the popular vote.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article