Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman Outs Himself
as Source for CIA Whistleblower Complaint (Video)….
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/19/2019 2:37:26 PM
HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes questioned NSC official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman about whether he had shared the contents of the phone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky with anyone outside the White House.
In responding Vindman stated “two people”, and then named State Dept George Kent, and a person from the intelligence community. Then things get interesting. Vindman refused to name the intelligence agency because it would likely expose the CIA “whistle-blower”.
This non-answer makes Alexander Vindman the source for the CIA “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
earlybird 11/19/2019 2:38:17 PM (No. 239488)
OP comment: Vindman is clearly not as clever as he thought.
30 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 11/19/2019 2:40:27 PM (No. 239491)
Busted. A confessed co-conspirator in the silent coup. President Trump should take away his commission as an officer and throw him out of the army.
48 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Tusker 11/19/2019 3:04:01 PM (No. 239509)
Comrade Schwartz György Vindman, global traitor at large.
15 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
curious1 11/19/2019 3:04:38 PM (No. 239510)
He just admitted to serious court-martial offenses. He's a leaker. Several years at Leavenworth ought to cool his jets.
43 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/19/2019 3:07:33 PM (No. 239512)
“Don’t you know who I am? I’m Lt Col Vindman. You’re not worthy enough to even Breath the same air I do”
Arrogant little twit.
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
rockeysroomie 11/19/2019 3:09:43 PM (No. 239515)
Mr. Vindman, I mean the Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, reminds me of "flounder" in Animal House.
23 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 11/19/2019 3:14:48 PM (No. 239524)
What he also admitted to, and should be examined in the Senate hearings, is he stepped out of the call, to alert two people, Kent and one other intelligence person.
This should be easily traced as to who that 2nd person is, and will come out at some point, I presume.
And, if he's presenting himself in uniform, does that mean despite not being in uniform on most work days at the WH, he should be held to the uniform conduct code?
After all, he just outed himself as the likely person who leaded the call's content.
23 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
john56 11/19/2019 3:19:58 PM (No. 239527)
#8 -- Except that Flounder was a likeable character.
Too bad somebody didn't say, "Lt. Col. Vindman, do you know a gentleman by the name of Eric Ciaramarella?"
22 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Faldo 11/19/2019 3:25:41 PM (No. 239534)
I'd like to see the lawyer that he reported his concerns to, John Eisenberg, the NSC's top lawyer, get hauled up for questioning...!
13 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
stablemoney 11/19/2019 4:03:01 PM (No. 239563)
When you have this many conspirators trying to frame the President, it gets very messy. This attempted coup is another bust. The last thing the Democrats better want is a Senate trial before the nation, that with the President's lawyers questioning these buffoons, that with the President calling his witnesses. That with the President able to put the whole Democrat Party, the whole Deep State on trial before the nation, and to stretch it out until the election. Do the Democrats think that is going to go well for them? If so, the Democrats are going to have their ears pinned.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
TLCary 11/19/2019 4:18:58 PM (No. 239579)
He said under oath that Trump demanded an investigation before Trump would give Ukraine anything.
The transcript clearly shows he asked for a favor and held nothing as a threat. NPR is spinning as best they can, but that sounds like PERJURY to me. If you use the R. Stone criteria for perjury he would be arrested already.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
wsdiego 11/19/2019 4:22:46 PM (No. 239582)
Democrats always displays their amateur incompetence!
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 11/19/2019 5:04:03 PM (No. 239606)
So Vindman whined to He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named (Ciaramella, cough, cough) and He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named (Ciaramella, cough, cough) decides HE is going to run with the ball, even though he doesn't really have it. The IG is in on the scam because he KNOWS hearsay is not acceptable for Whistleblower complaints so he unilaterally changes the rules to allow the fake run with the nothing ball. Shiffty and his staff get in on the play and provide cover, hiding the whiner, er ... Whistleblower under cover so deep that everyone in Washington and the Country now know who He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named (Ciaramella, cough, cough) is.
Now they are falling all over each other in a YUGE public farce that was green lighted by Nasty Pelousy reminding us once again that the dems are astonishingly incompetent.
Is this the Gang That Can't Think Straight? Are these clueless people who we want running the Country? I'm not even sure I want them IN the Country let along with any kind of authority.
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
seamusm 11/19/2019 5:05:30 PM (No. 239608)
A false whistle blower accusation should be grounds for civil sevice termination without any ability for re-hire as well as a dishonorable discharge for someone in the armed forces.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 11/19/2019 5:17:00 PM (No. 239616)
Who in the hell does he think is at the top of his chain of command?
The LTC is clearly insubordinate, and needs to be called to Captain's Mast, which will be in the Oval Office, in front of his actual boss,
the Commander in Chief, at minimum. A court martial for insubordination seems a minimum. When does this slop over into treason?
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
skacmar 11/19/2019 5:56:39 PM (No. 239654)
After Vindman outed himself as the "whistleblower's" source, he should have been asked about Ciamarella. After Schiff's head exploded about "not revealing the identity of the whistleblower", the questioner's response could have been "I thought you didn't know who the whistleblower is?. As the whistleblower's name is still a secret, unknown to even you, Chairman Schiff, using his name should not be an issue!"
4 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Muguy 11/19/2019 7:08:54 PM (No. 239736)
Conviction by HEARSAY or someone carrying the water for someone else is not admissible--
Unless we see and hear directly from the FIRST HAND SOURCE, all of this crap means nothing except an attempt to use media saturation into creating doubt and innuendo to help demonrat socialist political efforts in 2020.....
Anyone hearing any news about the presidential nominees from the demonrat sociaist party lately???
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 11/19/2019 8:31:47 PM (No. 239783)
Have to ask why didn't Vindman file the whistleblower complaint himself. Guess he wanted to keep his job. Its not going to work. The President is going to fire his sorry rear end, the Justice department is going to press charges, and Vindman's cronies who put him up to all this are suddenly going to make themselves scarce leaving him twisting in the wind.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
judy 11/20/2019 5:25:36 AM (No. 239929)
Did Vindman start all this? Bannon wanted him removed years ago from the WH. Sarah Carter had a lot of information on Vindman last night on Fox & it was not good. He reminds me of Scaramucci ....he's not as important as he thinks he is.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)