Sally Yates -vs- Michael Flynn…
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
4/29/2019 12:16:45 PM
Prior to March 9th, 2016, the political surveillance and spy operations of the Obama administration were using the FBI and NSA database to track/monitor their opposition. However, once the NSA compliance officer began initiating an internal review of who was accessing the system, the CIA and FBI moved to create ex post facto justification for their endeavors. [Full Backstory] After the November 8th, 2016, election everyone within the Obama network associated with the Trump surveillance operation was at risk. This is the impetus for the “Muh Russia” collusion- conspiracy narrative that was used as a mitigating shield. Within
Reply 1 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/29/2019 12:20:21 PM (No. 71882)
A sample, FTA:
By mid-December 2016 the Obama administration was deploying a full-court-press using their media allies to promote the Russia conspiracy. However, despite their public proclamations Clapper and Brennan were refusing to give any specifics to congress.
The hard narrative was that Russia interfered. That was the specific push from within the Obama intelligence apparatus writ large. All IC officials, sans Mike Rogers (NSA), had a self-interest in pushing this narrative; after all, it was the defensive mechanism to justify their illegal spying operation throughout 2016. This was their insurance policy.
The media was doing their part; and using the information leaked to them by those who were part of the 2016 operation(s) began battering the Trump transition team every hour of every day with questions about the Russia hacking narrative; thereby fertilizing the seeds of a collusion conspiracy.
They Obamaites knew they had to cover themselves. The media colluded with them to achieve this and ultimately ensnare others.
8 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jerseyden 4/29/2019 12:26:14 PM (No. 71879)
And yet still no charges have been filed against the obama admin. It looks like other than Trump the repubs are all talk and no action.
10 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Evocatus 4/29/2019 1:17:07 PM (No. 71886)
This is all a slow fuse burn before the tremendous political explosion that will inevitably occur. There are now too many undeniable facts to change the subject or change the channel or create distractions. And, all just in time for a National Presidential election.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
velirotta 4/29/2019 1:25:54 PM (No. 71887)
I´ll believe in their prosecution when I see it.
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
janjan 4/29/2019 1:52:30 PM (No. 71885)
One or two will talk. Lisa Page will be one of them. If she isn’t already.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
CJohnson 4/29/2019 2:18:12 PM (No. 71880)
GENERAL Flynn = Obama´s Director of DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE in 2013...how is it possible 3 years later the FBI is ´spying´ on him and actively leaking that he was a russian asset? HOW the FUQING hell ???
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 4/29/2019 3:31:28 PM (No. 71890)
I want Flynn back as a National Security advisor to the President.
73 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bohallx 4/29/2019 3:47:51 PM (No. 71881)
Sally Yates was clearly a ring leader in this.
Remember when she refused to send a US Attorney to a hearing in a federal district court to defend the nation?
That´s when she showed her true character ~ she´s a rebel!
Time to make war on her. Donald can do that.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
john56 4/29/2019 4:11:54 PM (No. 71884)
From Every thing I have read,it is obvious (1) FISA warrants were sought and probably obtained on people other than Mr Page and (2) the FISA judges were willing co-conspirators in this plot.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 4/29/2019 4:17:26 PM (No. 71889)
#9, I am not at all sure that your second supposition is well supported. I am willing to be convinced, but to me, the FISA judge´s detailed, angry report about FISA abuse, which was released in redacted form abotu 18 months ago, belies this theory.
It appears that the FISA judges have no legal path to getting an indictment based on that report. But, I hope that AG Barr will examine it and start indictments based on that and other facts being developed by IG Horowitz, another entity with only investigative powers, no prosecutorial powers.
1 person likes this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
john56 4/29/2019 10:08:57 PM (No. 71883)
Sure, one of the judges wrote a memo. But have there been any actions by the FISA judges against those who "defrauded" the court?
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 5/1/2019 5:00:58 AM (No. 71888)
#11, you call for "action by the FISA judges". What exactly do you expect?
I do not think that FISA judges have any power to bring charges, that is a prosecutorial job, not the job of a judge. They can and HAVE complain, and documented their complaint officially. If the offenders come forward in another issue, the judge could excoriate them, or toss them from his court, but I think they have far more limited powers than you imagine.
They rule on cases before them, I don´t know if they have any way to actually originate a case. Seems like that report would be the basis for any normal prosecutor to quickly start gathering information and then filing charges. Has not happened yet, though.
I agree greatly with your frustration.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
A long, absolutely surreal timeline. Fleshed out with detailed material and sources.