NYT Finally Acknowledges That Steele Dossier Might Not Be That Factual
Daily Wire,
by
Ashe Schow
Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx,
4/21/2019 12:13:19 AM
The salacious and uncorroborated “dossier” compiled by ex-British Intelligence officer Christopher Steele was used by the media to justify its endless attacks on President Donald Trump and accuse him of treason. The dossier was never anything more than opposition research paid for by Fusion GPS – and not even good opposition research at that. Steele reported rumors and gossip, including some Internet comments, to bolster his report. What wasn’t corroborated was downright debunked by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, including the allegations that former Trump attorney Michael Cohen went to Prague to meet with Russians.Now, after two years of using
Reply 1 - Posted by:
PChristopher 4/21/2019 12:41:14 AM (No. 40541)
Might not be that factual? That´s like saying that Cortez girl might not be that bright? Really? Ya think?
38 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 4/21/2019 12:46:06 AM (No. 40543)
Might not be factual? Give me a break it was made up and totally fake nothing factual about it.
32 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
padiva 4/21/2019 1:04:08 AM (No. 40535)
Yep, and HRC is the most virtuous woman in the world.
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
droopydog 4/21/2019 1:15:38 AM (No. 40522)
Which one of the NYT´s bloodhounds came to this conclusion?
31 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 4/21/2019 1:21:28 AM (No. 40532)
Even the bald faced liars and shameless propagandists at NYT are throwing in the towel on this big lie.
That is a good thing.
But still, never clicking on NYT, ever.
29 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bobn.t 4/21/2019 1:33:54 AM (No. 40521)
Really?
What a surprise.
16 people like this.
Well then, somebody needs to repay taxpayers $25 million.
28 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 4/21/2019 2:18:59 AM (No. 40528)
#7 - I nominate the Duchess of Chappaqua. She can use the slush fund known as the Clinton Foundation. After all, its less than what she spent on Web Hubbel´s daughter´s wedding.
26 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
leonardo 4/21/2019 3:41:41 AM (No. 40531)
Newsflash: LIARS LIE .... "Progressive" liars more so.
Readers READ the NYT because it cynically prints what their deluded elite want to read and believe. They´d vote for Obama again if only they could.
“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. ”
? George Orwell
16 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Marjbaldwin 4/21/2019 4:52:33 AM (No. 40540)
To write about media co-conspirators in Spygate, such as the Enemy of the People NYT, as if they only made mistakes or were misled or were not fully informed about the attempt to frame POTUS, is to not grasp the extent and seriousness of the crimes committed by the media co-conspirators in Spygate.
20 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree 4/21/2019 6:05:21 AM (No. 40523)
No! But not the hookers peeing on the bed Oobama may have slept on, right? Right? That’s gotta be true.
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Krause 4/21/2019 7:40:47 AM (No. 40533)
Wouldn’t you think the hot shot investigators, Nadler and Schill, would want to investigate the dossier?
16 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 4/21/2019 8:38:10 AM (No. 40539)
One thing missing, GPS Fusions client was a law firm whose client was Hillary and the DNC!
Imagine a paper generated for Trump that came up with an ACCURATE laundry list of Hillary´s faults and crimes. The media wouldn´t be trying to figure out what was true and what wasn´t. They would dismiss it, whole cloth, because it was a campaign product.
The media has been searching for a needle in a haystack; some bit of dossier "truth" they can hang on Trump. Now, well maybe it´s a pile of manure they are searching through BUT maybe there is still a pony hidden in it somewhere.
It´s a campaign document with Hillary´s slimy fingers all over it. It has NO value but it has cast the Country into turmoil for three years by trying to corrupt an election and destroy a presidency. How many blue dresses do we need to see before we realize the sleaze that is the Clintons?
15 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
mobyclik 4/21/2019 9:59:38 AM (No. 40530)
Hannity´s gonna have fun with this come Monday night. ATTACK those stinkin´ liars, Sean!
9 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
gone2pot 4/21/2019 10:42:10 AM (No. 40536)
Wow. Every story since November, 2016 from the NYT, CNN, well, all the Marxist media propagandists have assumed the dossier was true when it was proven false in December, 2016 and more so January, 2017. Mark Levin went into excruciating detail about the fake dossier in March, 2017, again proving without argument, the dossier was completely fabricated and the entire investigation was based upon the dossier. It´s not arguable that the dossier was fake, bought and paid for by the Hillary campaign. The FISA judges also knew this for the first attempt at acquiring the warrant to spy on Carter Page which IS arguable if the FISA judges are 100 percent fidiot morons AND completely bereft of legal knowledge OR they are a part of the illegal coup to overthrow the president. That is the ONLY way four FISA warrants against Carter Page could have been approved, period.
And yet, the propagandists and the elected Marxists had to further the lie about the dossier for almost three years to help remove the president from office. So, the NYT acknowledges now, when it´s okay to do so since the Orange Man Bad meme has morphed into "obstruction of justice," that the dossier "might not be factual."
Marx, Lenin and Stalin are delighted in their graves but certainly jealous as well.
13 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/21/2019 11:07:38 AM (No. 40524)
What the NYT thinks no longer matters and I won´t bother to read either. I´m waiting to hear what the FISA Court judges have to say about their criminal behavior in this "matter" and what the FBI did to bribe them into approving an obvious fraudulent warrant.
12 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/21/2019 12:10:58 PM (No. 40527)
You can bet that the Russians are laughing their butts off at all the turmoil that the false “dossier”, with no doubt input from people connected to the Russian intelligence service who supplied non verifiable information to the “former” British Intelligence agent, who then dumped the dossier into the US domestic media and politics where the leftist and liberal Democrats were pleased as punch to falsely state that the President of the USA was a Russian agent and a traitor, for partisan political reasons, as we can see now was without any credible evidence or foundation.
That domestic political turmoil did a lot of damage to the country, especially making it hard for the President of the USA to successfully negotiate with important foreign leaders, who no doubt were led to believe by Democrats like Barack Obama and John Kerry who continue to meet with foreign leaders after their terms in office have ended, to the effect that President Trump was going to be removed from office. Thus floating the notion that foreign leaders would be better off if they wait to deal with Trump’s successor, most likely a leftist or liberal Democrat from who they can get more “balanced” deal then from Trump who always puts America and American national interests first.
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Franz 4/21/2019 3:05:17 PM (No. 40534)
The NYT Finally Acknowledges That Steele Dossier Might Not Be That Factual.
My! The NYT proves that they are excelled at the power of understatement.
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
NotaBene 4/21/2019 4:09:21 PM (No. 40538)
Our Cultural Marxists propose that the Russians with one hundred thousand dollars in Facebook ads changed the election. In the meantime the NYT and Bezos Post gave Clinton and her adorables billions in free advertisements.
6 people like this.
Did the slimes just admit that
THEY might not be "factual"?
That all they print nowadays is Bull-Schiff?
s/
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 4/21/2019 8:04:15 PM (No. 40529)
Glad this article wasn´t from the NYT or I wouldn´t have clicked on it. I´m surprised the Times didn´t jump on their favored hobby horse: ´´Fake But Accurate.´´
5 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
rochow 4/21/2019 8:50:59 PM (No. 40525)
But that is not what McCain had to say after his aide flew to Britain to pick it up.....!
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)