Supreme Court case could reshape how California votes
San Francisco Examiner,
by
Marc Sandalow
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
6/7/2026 4:20:37 PM
Imagine putting your taxes in the mail a full week before the April 15 deadline, only to be fined by the Internal Revenue Service for a late filing. (snip)Like the IRS analogy above, they contend that by “election,” Congress did not merely mean the act of casting a ballot. They argued before the Supreme Court in March that “election” “plainly refer[s] to the combined action of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder.”
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
kennedylaw 6/7/2026 4:31:14 PM (No. 2113702)
"Imagine putting your taxes in the mail a full week before the April 15 deadline, only to be fined by the Internal Revenue Service for a late filing."
No problem. Set the mailing deadline one week earlier. Any deadline is an arbitrary date. The point is to have a single date.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 6/7/2026 4:43:36 PM (No. 2113706)
Emblazon on the return envelope - MUST be postmarked 4 days BEFORE election day. Can't vote in person - fine, but deadline moved for mail-in votes. NO post election day votes accepted. Ready to begin counting Tuesday at 12:01a, results by Wednesday.
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/7/2026 5:24:04 PM (No. 2113715)
No mail in balllots except for those who neeed them and request them as in the past.
28 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Kafka2 6/7/2026 5:56:50 PM (No. 2113716)
There is one inconvenient fact that if Democrats wait until they see the trends in ballot counts before cast their ballots, their ballots could not be postmarked by Election Day. The collection of the mail is completed before the day before the polls close. And, the first counts are made and some time after that. The mail collect the next day will have the day after postmark.
The big problem is when the ballots are mailed out. The ballots are mailed to address where people have moved or died. Even if the voter registration is up tto date, there is no way to know if that is who filled out the ballot.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 6/7/2026 6:25:43 PM (No. 2113717)
The most ‘move along, nothing to see here’ article ever. Maybe the supreme joke will say there can be a grace period of 3, 10, 14 or more days after ‘election day’. And not one single vote can be counted until the grace period expires. And all ballots must be kept secure under military guard at a US military base.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Mushroom 6/7/2026 6:27:46 PM (No. 2113718)
I honestly believe the local USPS people would be willing to backdate ballots for Democrat stuffing.
18 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 6/7/2026 6:44:21 PM (No. 2113725)
"It would require a vast conspiracy involving hundreds of election workers risking prison time to pull off election fraud on the scale Trump is suggesting." I think we all know the Democrat Party is fully capable to run a vast conspiracy, they have all the tools, laws, money and people in place to carry it out.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 6/7/2026 6:50:35 PM (No. 2113726)
Re #7, the claim seems reasonable until you realize that in California, a Dem doing election fraud faces exactly ZERO RISK of been put in prison.
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
FormerDem 6/7/2026 7:35:25 PM (No. 2113730)
yeah, cheaters? tell us more of your moral thoughts. we pine for your insights. go count your money and shut up.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 6/7/2026 7:38:21 PM (No. 2113731)
FTA voters holding out to see whether Xavier Becerra needed their vote to keep the top two vote-getters from being Republicans would have faced increasing risk that their vote would not arrive in time...
That's a big part of the problem. We're supposed to accommodate Democrats playing political games to disenfranchise Republican voters up to the latest possible moment.
8 people like this.
The comparison between preparing and filing a tax return and voting is ridiculous. For obvious reasons, completing a tax return "in person" is ridiculous but voting in person has until very recently been the norm and should continue to be, particularly since most localities enable in person voting for several days up to and including election day. IRS mailing addresses are usually in distant cities while voting locations and addresses for returning ballots should be in a voter's locality and can be delivered by a family member if there is a potential problem with local mail delivery.
4 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
mifla 6/8/2026 8:16:14 AM (No. 2113863)
The Dem argument seems to be that mail in voters should be allowed to wait until the last possible moment to vote, so they can collect any and all information on the candidates. I hope the plaintiff points out that this opens the door for last minute fraud given that the defendants send ballots to those who have not requested them, refuse to clean up their voter rolls, and refuse to require an ID. I think this is going to be one of those 5-4 votes, with Roberts' vote making the difference. Given that federal elections impact the entire country, I doubt if the court will simply kick it back to the states. We shall see.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)