Post New Article

Should the Ghouls Publicly Celebrating
Charlie Kirk's Assassination Lose Their Jobs?

Original Article

Posted By: Hazymac, 9/16/2025 11:14:11 AM

In the aftermath of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a violently deranged and hate-filled leftist (yes, that is a confirmed fact), some on the hard Left have been publicly expressing justifications for, and even celebrations of, the murder. These ghouls do not represent America, nor do they represent America's center-left coalition writ large. Many politicians, public figures and private citizens on the 'progressive' end of the spectrum have prominently and unequivocally denounced the killing. This must be acknowledged and embraced with gratitude by all people of good will. The forces of decency must stand together against the cancer of political violence and twisted vigilantism.

Post Reply

Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”

Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.


Reply 1 - Posted by: DogFacedPonySoldier 9/16/2025 11:31:08 AM (No. 2004598)
I think Charlie would say no.
14 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: SweetPea3 9/16/2025 11:38:42 AM (No. 2004603)
Private employers have every right to say who works for their company. If they know an employee is behaving in a manner unbefitting of their company image/values, the owners have every right to fire them.
37 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Gordon Freeman 9/16/2025 11:40:42 AM (No. 2004606)
I think it depends on their employer. I definitely think a public/ elected person should be fired.
36 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: Kafka2 9/16/2025 11:42:10 AM (No. 2004607)
Anyone who celebrates political murder is not a person one should have on your premises. They are a potential danger if the choose to act on their belief. Just expressing such beliefs shows that they are not a rational person.
32 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: crashnburn 9/16/2025 11:43:15 AM (No. 2004608)
Charlie might say no, but the US cannot survive the leftist death culture. And I'm tired of all these politicians essentially saying that both sides do it and can't we all just get along. Yes, a few right-wing nut jobs do it, but the rest of us on the right are appalled. On the left, they celebrate violence. Also, we've been trying to just get along with the leftist nut jobs (but I repeat myself) for decades, and they've only gotten more blatant. It's way past time to stop just getting a long and start holding these nut jobs responsible. Companies have already seen the power of boycotting and Office Depot took quick and decisive action to excise the cancer who refused to print a flyer for a Charley Kirk vigil. I'm sure that convinced others in that company not to bring their politics to the work place. I'm also sure that other companies will use Office Depot as a good example of how to deal with leftist loon employees.
22 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: MissNan 9/16/2025 11:47:43 AM (No. 2004611)
Yes, immediately.
18 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Venturer 9/16/2025 11:53:59 AM (No. 2004614)
I would say No. If you fired everyone who ever made a stupid comment you wouldn't have many employees. If these people stopped and thought for a moment before they ran off at the mouth they probably would not have made asses of themselves. I would think it would make a difference also in what they said, Some just glad to see the rhetoric stop and see the person that was kicking their ass in debates gone. Other who wnat to see wholesale slaughter of all Conservatives.
1 person likes this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: seamusm 9/16/2025 12:06:15 PM (No. 2004617)
Maybe it would depend on how 'public' such a figure is and the nature of their job. If a teacher or school official - yes. If some janitorial worker posts their leftward opinion celebrating evil - maybe not. If an elected figure, perhaps their constituents should decide, though there is no voter-driven recall mechanism in the US Constitution for members of Congress - only self-policing censure or expulsion. The President can be removed by the US Senate through the process of impeachment, but I do not think vile speech about a political opponent would rise to the standard of 'high crimes and treason'.
2 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: bpl40 9/16/2025 12:18:32 PM (No. 2004621)
Losing jobs is not enough. They should be made 'unemployable'. Any employer re-hiring them should face the public wrath. Government service is of course out of the question.
11 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: stablemoney 9/16/2025 12:30:22 PM (No. 2004629)
The left was fine with those refusing their shots to be fired from hospitals, other employments, and the armed forces. It is time for the left to lose their jobs.
27 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: DVC 9/16/2025 12:38:39 PM (No. 2004632)
Yes.
18 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: crashnburn 9/16/2025 12:41:05 PM (No. 2004634)
#8. A slight correction. It’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors that warrant impeachment and conviction.
7 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: JunkYardDog 9/16/2025 12:42:02 PM (No. 2004635)
I think they should lose thier jobs. On the day Charlie was assasinated, I was messaging someone at my firm when the news broke. I texted that CK was shot, the response was You support Charlie Kirk? Why? I responded because I support all that is right and decent and just. The comeback was a snippet from Google saying was a controversial figure who was a mysoginist, didn't support women's healthcare. I texted back that Google is biased. A screenshot of Google showing The GULF OF AMERICA then appeared-what that was supposewd to prove I've no idea.. The kicker was a message saying they didn't want to pursue the convo anymore and that they were SORRY FOR MY LOSS. My response was ITS EVERYBODYS LOSS. Whatever respect I had for this person has evaporated.
22 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: chefrandy 9/16/2025 12:46:47 PM (No. 2004636)
Perhaps not, however, taking the medical profession-would you completely trust your provider knowing their public proclamations if they found out you were conservative? In the hospitality industry-do you trust your server/cook/owner knowing their public proclamations to not alter or mess with your food? LEO/Fire/Paramedic--accident or willful negligence? Even something like a tattoo artist or other service provider can put an individual or group at risk.
13 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: TXknitter 9/16/2025 12:48:04 PM (No. 2004637)
Oh I believe Charlie Kirk, a tireless free speech advocate, would hate people losing their jobs but stand up for the right of a private employer to enforce the values of his/her company.
16 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: mean Gene 9/16/2025 12:53:33 PM (No. 2004639)
Democrat representatives are now opposed to military discipline if it means punishment for expressing glee or joy over Charlie Kirk's assassination. One actually stated that discipline is "un-American."
7 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: zephyrgirl 9/16/2025 1:04:34 PM (No. 2004643)
People who celebrate the assination of a public figure are evil and full of hate. Frankly, I don't want to be around them nor do I want to (1) ride in a plane or bus piloted by one, (2) be on an operating table with one wielding the scalpel or anesthesia, (3) have them around my kids in any capacity, (4) adviseme on my health, (5) clean my house, (6) repairi my cars, or (7) treat my pets. This is by no means an exhaustive list. What assurance do I have that they won't act out on their hatred if they don't like my political views? Evil escalates over time when there are no consequences. They need consequences, and if firing is the consequence, so be it.
16 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: Quigley 9/16/2025 1:05:40 PM (No. 2004644)
The Left engaging in creating and furthering an atmosphere conducive to political assassination must be stopped. Firing people for saying a woman is someone who was born with a womb is weaponizing fantasy-based ideologies.
6 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: franco 9/16/2025 1:06:20 PM (No. 2004645)
Employers have every right to set non-negotiable standards for conduct and behavior in the workplace. I'm guessing there will be little disagreement with that. The question then becomes: If an employee expresses an affinity for violence to solve disagreements over political opinions, it is incumbent upon the employer to notice and take action? I say yes, because if they do not, it is not difficult to imagine an open and shut civil suit for negligence on the part of the employer when such an unhinged employee causes violence to be committed in the workplace. This is not a difficult call at all.
10 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: mariboo72 9/16/2025 1:21:13 PM (No. 2004649)
For those who are posting glee for Charlie's murder, my heart says yes but my knowledge of the Constitution says no and I believe Charlie would say no. Maybe a one time warning but even that would threaten free speech. However, I think the law might say something about those who are posting about hope, encouragement, or threats for the assassination or murder of someone.
5 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: caljeepgirl 9/16/2025 1:31:59 PM (No. 2004654)
Should ultimately be strictly company's judgment call!
9 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: wilarrbie 9/16/2025 1:32:53 PM (No. 2004655)
What happened when people disrespected George Floyd? Although many wouldn't, out of fear for their lives. (I'm sensing a pattern here.) One of the silliest reprisals was when a much-trafficked roadway painted with BLM/Floyd signage became the subject of tire squealings. People went to jail and/or were fined.
6 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: Californian 9/16/2025 1:36:42 PM (No. 2004657)
1, Charlie might say no but since they murdered him and he's no longer here to speak for himself, I say, yes, every last one of them. They are evil to the core and mentally ill psychotics as well and need to be purged from the rest of normal society. We can no longer exile people but we can in effect internally exile them for their horrific behavior.
7 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: NYbob 9/16/2025 1:43:18 PM (No. 2004660)
Don't confuse pure hate and advocating lethal violence with free speech. I have NO right to threaten anyone about anything. Every one of these freaks wants harm to come to anyone they don't like. They justify their desire for death to their opponents, by referencing lies from evil, corrupt media. Soros and other enemies of civilized society love these maniacs because if not stopped, they will destroy everything good in the west. They vandalize our cities, businesses and institutions, either by burning them down or by perverting them. They kill any innocent they know that will horrify every normal, moral person. From children to any adult that isn't ready to defend themselves. They might hold office, have degrees, or are part of the professional class, but they are just as dangerous and vicious as any thug criminal. For my entire lifetime, they have used our tolerance for dissent and argument to sugar coat sedition, anarchy, and targeted violence. EVERY tyranny does this at the beginning. I don't give a fig about what degree of insanity these creeps have. I don't care if they are lazy and quoting the leftist sewer on the internet, or if they really believe it. It must be stopped. Cold. We, as a society, will not allow every thought to be blasted into soft brains, usually confined to the worst, depraved behavior, but some of them are yelling for outright murder. This is not a match, this is a wildfitre, and it will consume our nation, if we do not confront it. Forcing maniacs to deal with death threats, is mandatory.
11 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: hurricanegirl 9/16/2025 1:56:14 PM (No. 2004669)
Oh, good grief! Why are we even debating such a stupid issue? OF COURSE you have the right to (pretty much) say whatever you want to according to the First Amendment. However, you DON'T have a right to get and/or keep a job no matter what you say. That is and should continue to be at the discretion of the employer. Why is Guy trying to conflate the two?
8 people like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: NorthernDog 9/16/2025 1:56:58 PM (No. 2004670)
The article is a bit long but worth reading. There's a difference between 'cancel culture' and being fired for celebrating a violent death. Some of these celebrants took the time to type out their deplorable comments and hit the send button. Most have expressed no regret of wishing death on a young man with two small children and a wonderful wife.
4 people like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: WhamDBambam 9/16/2025 1:59:40 PM (No. 2004672)
That's the rule the Left imposed on me during the COVID idiocy and the DEI nuttiness.
7 people like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: Doc1 9/16/2025 2:01:36 PM (No. 2004673)
That depends on whether their employer wants employs with a total lack of empathy and fair play, not to mention poor judgement for openly celebrating someone's assassination. As an employer I would not.
7 people like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: privateer 9/16/2025 2:21:33 PM (No. 2004679)
18 gives me an idea. Why not refer to that type of person as a 'womban' (silent 'b') If you have a womb, you are one; otherwise, you're not.
2 people like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: Ditto1958 9/16/2025 2:55:32 PM (No. 2004688)
Not just as a knee jerk reaction. But in some occupations, I think it’s appropriate, such as elementary school teachers.
5 people like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: MissMann 9/16/2025 2:58:36 PM (No. 2004689)
Yes, but not as punishment or revenge. It's just so no one should have to rely on the service of someone who so obviously detests them and those with similar beliefs and would be happy to see them dead. I don't want my children being taught or cared for by someone who would be celebrate their death.
3 people like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: navybrat 9/16/2025 5:03:06 PM (No. 2004741)
I would not want a person in my employ who justifies and applauds murder. I would also not want a doctor treating me or a pilot on a plane I was on who advocated death.
1 person likes this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: chance_232 9/16/2025 5:13:38 PM (No. 2004752)
These are the new rules that the liberal progressive democrats put into place and have had corporate America enforce since Obama. They are the people that will dig through 30 years of social media posts to find something negative. Dox you, swat you, protest you, complain to your employer, deplatform you, have your bank accounts closed, your social media accounts frozen, demonitized you, protest you in restaurants, assault you etc etc. Remember they managed to get the CEO of Apple canned for saying that he believed that marriage was between a man and woman. So yeah, they should be fired. They would have you fired in a heartbeat if they could. And finally, do you want to work with someone who supports and celebrates murdering someone like you, for speaking what you think? Would your coworker cheer if you were capped for your political beliefs? 10 years ago, my answer would have been no. But after what the left did with DEI, Climate Change, transgenderism, Covid etc, etc, They have changed my mind.
1 person likes this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: paral04 9/16/2025 5:43:36 PM (No. 2004767)
Yes they should. We have too much violence in our society today and it is time to stop it. Hate speech intended to rile people up should be forcefully discouraged.
0 people like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: danu 9/16/2025 5:44:23 PM (No. 2004768)
who wants to work w ghouls?? they're they're weird, toxic , miserable, unprofessional self-obsessed bullies.
0 people like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: cor-vet 9/16/2025 7:55:06 PM (No. 2004820)
I would say no, but I also plan on hoisting a pint, or three or four, when Hanoi Jane assumes room temperature. Same for Nancy, Soros and the twins, Schiff and Schumer. The bad thing is, celebrating their demise will put me with them for eternity!
0 people like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: Birddog 9/16/2025 8:08:49 PM (No. 2004827)
There is an existing legal doctrine "Depraved Heart/Depraved indifference" where an accessory before/after the fact can be prosecuted for the murder, even if they did not actively participate....That IS the ground these people are treading into. Consider it in the same context as "Supporting/cheering/advocating a Lynching" Sadly, my sister is one...I have avoided even checking a couple of my cousins Fazbuk postings because I'm fairly certain they are as well. If they advocate the killing of "someone like Charlie, someone like Trump"...they are advocating the killing of ME as well.
0 people like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: Birddog 9/16/2025 8:28:00 PM (No. 2004840)
since people are ONLY calling for them to lose their "Positions of Public Trust" paychecks...I have no issue, though I do think that Tarring and feathering in a public space (with all natural karo syrup/honey instead of actual hot tar, pitch, or fossil fuels), maybe also accompanied by riding them around on a rail through the town square....perhaps putting some of them in stocks and pelting them with rotten (all organic, GMO Free) produce would/could produce the desired response more thoroughly.
1 person likes this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Hazymac"
Horatius Cocles, Meet Kash Patel 8 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/17/2025 9:13:23 AM Post Reply
In myth or fictional movies, there's always a hero who does the heroic stuff. In history, though, there are heroes who perform such incredible feats of courage and valor that they're added to history. Add a generation or two, and that history becomes legend. Add another generation or two, and that legend becomes mythic. When Rome trembled before foreign hosts, in ancient times, one man stood at the opening of a narrow wooden bridge across the Tiber River. After the Etruscans attacked, the Romans panicked, and the bridge behind Horatius had to be destroyed before the enemy could use it. Scarred, one-eyed Horatius Cocles refused to yield, fighting until
Be Careful of the Cornered Democrat Rat 10 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 1:11:33 PM Post Reply
We all know that when you corner an animal, it will fight tooth and nail for its survival. This means that even supposedly meek creatures will defend themselves with a surprising level of frenzy and violence. The choice for any cornered creature facing death is to go out with an all-out snarl. This is where the Democrat party movement finds itself. Snubbed at the polls, cut off from sub rosa USAID sustenance, humiliated time and again by the ever adroit Donald Trump, and hemorrhaging its plantation BIPOCs, the party has resorted to obscenities, outright antisemitism, and the defense of criminals everywhere (including drug-runners
Should the Ghouls Publicly Celebrating
Charlie Kirk's Assassination Lose Their Jobs?
38 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 11:14:11 AM Post Reply
In the aftermath of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a violently deranged and hate-filled leftist (yes, that is a confirmed fact), some on the hard Left have been publicly expressing justifications for, and even celebrations of, the murder. These ghouls do not represent America, nor do they represent America's center-left coalition writ large. Many politicians, public figures and private citizens on the 'progressive' end of the spectrum have prominently and unequivocally denounced the killing. This must be acknowledged and embraced with gratitude by all people of good will. The forces of decency must stand together against the cancer of political violence and twisted vigilantism.
Political Violence Poll Just Nuked This
CNN Host's Talking Point on Trump's Remarks
About Charlie Kirk
2 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 11:06:56 AM Post Reply
Some top Trump officials have made some not-so-helpful remarks about free speech and hate speech, namely from Attorney General Pam Bondi. I don’t think the government should be the point of the lance in targeting people who say insane things. We, as citizens, do a fine job exposing those creeps—there have been hordes of professionals fired or placed on leave for gross posts celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We’ll revisit that later, but, of course, CNN was aghast at this, with host Abby Phillip trying to spin this as a move to punish the Left and President Trump’s political rivals. That’s such a juvenile, knee-jerk take.
Let’s go uncrazy 1 reply
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 9:00:31 AM Post Reply
Governor Walz is still threatening to call a special session of the Minnesota legislature in the aftermath of last month’s mass shooting by Robin (formerly Robert) Westman at Annunciation Church in Minneapolis. He wants them to do something about “gun violence” and to adopt an “assault weapons” ban. Walz has been threatening to call the special session for a while. Something has caused him to pause. Perhaps it’s the fact that not all Democratic legislators think it’s a brilliant idea. Perhaps it’s the fact that Republicans would offer their own proposals to address the shooting, including this one: “Repeal or amend the Democrats’ prohibition
Okay, Now Leftists Are Posting Hit Lists
of the People They Want to Murder Next
13 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 8:40:54 AM Post Reply
The left is evil. The left is a gang of terrorists. If you have any lingering doubt about that, consider this: first they were celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk, but now leftists are making those celebrations look practically innocent. Hit lists have begun to appear on social media, as bloodthirsty leftists indulge their fantasies about which of their designated enemies they would like to see murdered next. And yes, there is no doubt whatsoever that the people who are openly displaying their bloodlust in this way think all the while that they occupy the moral high ground.
Pentagon calls Charlie Kirk posts ‘domestic
terrorism’; Dem warns discipline is ‘un-American’
16 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 8:13:15 AM Post Reply
The Pentagon is not backing down from its quest for consequences for those who celebrate Charlie Kirk’s killing, even as Democrats warn the move is "un-American" and violates free speech protections. The controversy underscores a clash between military discipline and First Amendment rights, with top Pentagon officials arguing that celebrating the killing of an American political figure is unacceptable conduct for service members — while Democrats counter that the crackdown risks punishing constitutionally protected speech. "Hunting down and prosecuting service members for their individual political beliefs is dangerous and un-American," Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., a former Army Ranger, wrote on X.
The Right Unites in the UK 7 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 8:05:28 AM Post Reply
On Saturday, a huge crowd turned out for a “Unite the Kingdom” rally in London. It was led by Tommy Robinson, and Elon Musk appeared via video link. The crowd also honored Charlie Kirk. Official estimates put the crowd between 100,000 and 150,000. I am no expert on crowd size, but it looked much bigger than that. Some partisans claimed it was as many as three million. English and United Kingdom flags were everywhere. The demonstrators were protesting the British government’s immigration policies, which threaten to render England extinct, and assaults on freedom of speech, exemplified by recent arrests of conservatives for tweets. In the U.K., if someone rapes a 12-year-old
The New York Times Perpetuates a Lie 12 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 7:57:16 AM Post Reply
Probably the worst crime a journalist can commit is attributing to someone a statement–putting it in quotation marks–that the person never said. That would get you fired from a 9th grade student paper. But it is exactly what former Washington Post “journalist” Karen Attiah did, on the BlueSky hate platform: (X) The quote Attiah attributed to Charlie Kirk? He never said it. She just made it up. Her fabrication was rapidly exposed on X, and The Washington Post did the only thing it could, confronted with such misconduct: they fired her. So Attiah took her grievance to the New York Times, which printed a sympathetic account by one Benjamin Mullin: Karen Attiah,
State Department Revokes Visa for Rapper
Who Mocked Assassination of Charlie Kirk
8 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 7:53:06 AM Post Reply
The Trump-Rubio U.S. State Department revoked the visa of a punk rapper who viciously and gleefully mocked the assassination of Charlie Kirk at a show. A clip of Bobby Vylan, aka Pascal Robinson-Foster, the frontman for the English punk rap duo also called Bob Vylan, sparked outrage when he ghoulishly joked and danced on stage after Kirk’s assassination. Walking back in forth in front of a Palestinian flag at an Amsterdam venue, Vylan ranted, “I wanna dedicate this next one to an absolute piece of sh** of a human being, the pronouns was/were,” at which the audience began screaming and applauding with excitement. Grinning, Vylan yelled, “Cause if you talk
Iryna Zarutska, Charlie Kirk, and the
Democrat Party
5 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 7:45:57 AM Post Reply
Three recent events have underscored the catastrophic erosion of the foundational tenets of the United States and the anti-Americanism of the Democrat Party. The first is the brutal murder of a young woman in Charlotte, N.C., Iryna Zarutska. The second, the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The third, sitting Democrat senator Tim Kaine’s declaration reflecting a fundamental belief within the current Democrat Party that the government is the source and, thus, the final arbiter of all human rights. Over the centuries, those that deem the state is paramount and, thus, the source of all rights, believe granting, limiting, or denying these rights is the sole discretion of the state based on
Dems Are Lucky We're Not Violent About
Them Calling Us Violent
4 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 7:30:22 AM Post Reply
Happy Tuesday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. (Snip) Back in June of 2022, I wrote a column asking why I should give up my guns if they weren't harming or killing anyone. It was a valid question, given the fact that gun grabbers were constantly demonizing me for something that I had never done and was never planning to do. It's something that most of us on the conservative side of things are familiar with. We had four straight years of the Biden Stasi FBI saying that we were the biggest looming domestic terror threat in the United States. We were really bad at it, by the way,
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Justice Sotomayor questions if Americans
know the difference between presidents
and kings
43 replies
Posted by NorthernDog 9/17/2025 10:30:34 AM Post Reply
Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday warned that the poor quality of civics education means Americans may not know the difference between a president and a king. Sotomayor bemoaned the lack of education about such issues as the rule of law, saying not enough people have a basic understanding of the power of the president and the limits imposed upon that authority by the Constitution. "Do we understand what the difference is between a king and a president?" she said at a civics conference held at New York Law School in Manhattan. "And I think if people understood
New Jersey legalizes human composting
as eco-friendly burial alternative
39 replies
Posted by JoElla Bee 9/16/2025 10:16:19 PM Post Reply
Living up to its name even in death. The Garden State approved a bill that legalizes human composting, an alternative to traditional burials in which a corpse is transformed into nutrient-rich soil that loved ones can use to feed their favorite houseplant or scatter like ashes. Human composting, more formally known as natural organic reduction, has skyrocketed in popularity after the COVID-19 pandemic left more than a million Americans dead.New Jersey is the 14th state to have legalized the practice over the last six years.
Should the Ghouls Publicly Celebrating
Charlie Kirk's Assassination Lose Their Jobs?
38 replies
Posted by Hazymac 9/16/2025 11:14:11 AM Post Reply
In the aftermath of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a violently deranged and hate-filled leftist (yes, that is a confirmed fact), some on the hard Left have been publicly expressing justifications for, and even celebrations of, the murder. These ghouls do not represent America, nor do they represent America's center-left coalition writ large. Many politicians, public figures and private citizens on the 'progressive' end of the spectrum have prominently and unequivocally denounced the killing. This must be acknowledged and embraced with gratitude by all people of good will. The forces of decency must stand together against the cancer of political violence and twisted vigilantism.
Obama Implies Trump to Blame for Charlie
Kirk Assassination: ‘Extreme Views Were
Not in My White House’
35 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/17/2025 5:08:57 PM Post Reply
Former President Barack Obama implied Tuesday that President Donald Trump was to blame for Charlie Kirk’s assassination, because of “extreme” personnel and policies that aroused violent opposition. Obama was interviewed onstage by Steve Scully at the Jefferson Educational Society in Erie, Pennsylvania. He mourned Kirk’s death, saying it was “horrific,” but made sure to recite an (inaccurate) laundry list of Kirk’s more controversial statements, including a false claim that Kirk claimed black women were stupid. Obama then said that Trump wanted to use Kirk’s assassination as “a rationale
Robert Redford, ‘Butch Cassidy’ and
‘All the President’s Men’ Icon,
Dies at 89
21 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/16/2025 9:57:31 AM Post Reply
Robert Redford, the leading man with the golden-boy looks who won an Oscar for directing “Ordinary People” and later became a godfather for independent film as founder of the Sundance Film Institute, has died. He was 89. Cindi Berger, chief executive of the publicity firm Rogers & Cowan PMK, confirmed the news to Variety. “Robert Redford passed away on September 16, 2025, at his home at Sundance in the mountains of Utah — the place he loved, surrounded by those he loved,” Berger said in a statement. “He will be missed greatly. The family requests privacy.”
Obama Opens Up on Kirk Assassination,
Scolds Trump for ‘Extreme’ Rhetoric
20 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/17/2025 4:28:53 PM Post Reply
Former President Barack Obama addressed the assassination of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk on Tuesday, calling the killing a “tragedy” that poses a “threat to all of us” before scolding President Trump for contributing to a dangerous political climate. Speaking with journalist Steve Scully at the Jefferson Educational Society in Pennsylvania, Obama cast Kirk’s assassination as part of an escalating trend of political violence. “Regardless of where you are on the political spectrum, what happened to Charlie Kirk was horrific and a tragedy,”
George Zinn, elderly rabble-rouser who
falsely claimed he shot Charlie Kirk,
is hit with child porn charges
20 replies
Posted by JoElla Bee 9/16/2025 6:06:02 PM Post Reply
The elderly rabble-rouser who allegedly hindered Utah authorities’ response after Charlie Kirk was fatally shot is now accused of keeping “graphic” sexual photos of children on his phone, according to law enforcement. George Zinn, 71, was charged with four counts of sexual exploitation of a minor Monday after investigators found more than 20 images of kids as young as 5 years old, at least partially naked and “posing” in a “sexual” way, the Utah County Sheriff’s Office said in a news release Tuesday. “Zinn admitted … that[snip] his preferred victim age is 5 to 12 years old,” the agency alleged.
Before A Left-Wing Assassin Murdered Charlie
Kirk, Chris Wray’s FBI Tried To Destroy
Turning Point USA
18 replies
Posted by Moritz55 9/16/2025 3:23:16 PM Post Reply
Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA was on a short list of Republican groups targeted by President Joe Biden’s FBI under the direction of then-Director Christopher Wray. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, dropped that bombshell Tuesday during a Senate Judiciary Committee regular hearing on the oversight of the FBI, along with a revolting new document. “It’s well-understood that your predecessor left you an FBI infected with politics,” Grassley said in his opening statement, speaking to current FBI Director Kash Patel. As proof, Grassley shared recently released records listing 92 targets the FBI was investigating or intending to investigate in the large-scale, multi-year political weaponization operation named Arctic Frost
Trump to sue New York Times for $15 billion,
alleging defamation and libel
18 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/16/2025 1:10:42 AM Post Reply
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he would file a $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times, alleging defamation and libel, and calling the newspaper a “mouthpiece” for the Democratic party. In a post on Truth Social, Trump attacked the newspaper for being “a virtual ‘mouthpiece’ for the Radical Left Democratic Party,” while accusing if of making false statements about him, his family and business, without elaborating on the allegations. The lawsuit suit was being brought in the state of Florida, Trump said without providing further details.
FBI Sources Alleged Biden Stopped Burisma
Investigation ‘To Protect The Interests
Of Hunter,’ New Docs Show
17 replies
Posted by earlybird 9/17/2025 1:30:04 PM Post Reply
While he was vice president, Joe Biden stepped onto taxpayer-funded Air Force 2, traveled to Ukraine, and conducted personal business with Ukraine’s then-President Petro Poroshenko. He was there “to protect the interests of Hunter Biden,” according to documents released Tuesday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, (snip) The new documents strengthen the information in previously released records. Last Congress, Grassley released FBI 1023 records — statements from confidential sources — alleging that when Biden was vice president, executives for Ukrainian gas company Burisma put his son Hunter Biden on the company’s board of directors to “protect us through his dad, from all kinds of problems,” according to that “confidential human source.”
Throw the Towel: Kash Patel Wrecks ‘Biggest
Fraud in the US Senate’ Adam Schiff
in Heated Exchange
17 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/16/2025 8:37:37 PM Post Reply
Senator Adam Schiff made an appearance at a Senate Oversight Committee hearing on Tuesday and was summarily leveled by a wrecking ball named Kash Patel. Schiff and Patel engaged in a rather lopsided exchange in which the California Democrat demanded answers as to why Ghislaine Maxwell had been transferred from a low-security federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas. The implication being that the move was part of a wink and a nod agreement coinciding with an interview conducted by U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Schiff inquired
ABC’s Gutman: Alleged Kirk Assassin’s
Texts With Trans Lover Were ‘Intimate,’ ‘Touching’
17 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 9/16/2025 8:01:06 PM Post Reply
On Tuesday’s ABC News Special Report about Utah County officials formally announcing charges against the suspect in Charlie Kirk’s murder, chief national correspondent Matt Gutman expressed affinity for the suspect and admiration for his love story with a trans person, gushing the text messages released by authorities were “lovingly” stated, “very intimate,” and “very touching.” Gutman was reporting from the site of the press conference when he told World News Tonight anchor David Muir something “that stood out” was “those text messages” between the suspect and his roommate/lover.
Post New Article