Justice Kavanaugh Asks Jack Smith’s
Prosecutor Why Barack Obama Was Never
Charged For Drone Strikes Against Civilians (Audio)
Gateway Pundit,
by
Christina Laila
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
4/26/2024 3:57:49 AM
The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments on Trump’s presidential immunity claim in Jack Smith’s January 6 case in DC after a federal appeals court ruled Trump was not immune from prosecution.
Trump’s lawyers previously argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.
At issue before the Supreme Court is whether a US President is immune from criminal prosecution for official (not personal) acts.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked DOJ prosecutor M
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/26/2024 4:09:14 AM (No. 1706244)
Please ask him why Joe Biden isn't being prosecuted for violating Federal law in having stacks ofTop Secret Documents from when he was a Senator then Vice President being held in his GARAGE and his office provided by UPenn.
80 people like this.
Clinton bombing Belgrade in 1999? The first bombing of a European city since WW2?
56 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Trigger2 4/26/2024 4:44:21 AM (No. 1706256)
Why? Because demonrats are special and entitled to the second lawyer system.
55 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rinktum 4/26/2024 5:10:19 AM (No. 1706265)
Good to see that the Justices who follow the Constitution still have the ability to speak the truth. If democrats get their way, the Court would be expanded and only their activist judges would be confirmed. It is good to see a little pushback on these arrogant fools. Take them school and make them hear what the law actually has to say.
51 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
chumley 4/26/2024 5:39:11 AM (No. 1706277)
Ask why the alphabet agencies routinely spy on American citizens without a warrant or even the slightest suspicion of any wrongdoing, yet never face a penalty.
Its a clear violation of the 4th amendment yet nobody in power ever says anything. They just pass more laws that further limit the Bill Of Rights.
34 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
BarryNo 4/26/2024 6:59:07 AM (No. 1706318)
This whole Trump Lawfare deal is really going to come back and bite them. After all, Democrats commit actual crimes. Chargeable crimes. There is no statute of limitations on murder, or treason, I think. Obama could be charged with murder for droning those ISIS pukes because they never received judicial review. They were merely executed by drone. General Miley communicated, illegally with the CCP promising to help them, against Trump - Treason. Hillary kept thousands of documents in her unsecured email against the law. So what if that Justice Department refused to prosecute? Every newly appointed DOJ is a new beast.
Democrats are accepting millions, if not billions of dollars into their coffers from foreign sources. I believe lots can be said about that! Stop this whole, "We're better than they are, we have to get along..." bullcrap. You can't get along with an enemy determined to kill you.
46 people like this.
How about Biden’s drone strike on some perfectly innocent civilian family in Afghanistan to try to cover up his disastrous withdrawal and defeat?
That was just plain murder.
41 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Venturer 4/26/2024 7:16:57 AM (No. 1706334)
I would like to see this whole jack Smith trial and charges against Trump, but i hate to see immunity granted to Democrats , they should be punished. Obama Clinton and Joe Biden should be prosecuted but they will receive immunity also if Trump is given it.
Now having said that, let me also say that the immunity should exist, and that even if it doesn't the cowardly Uniparty Republicans haven't got the balls to charge a democrat even if it doesn't.
21 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
qr4j 4/26/2024 8:01:52 AM (No. 1706355)
Oral arguments? Maybe from Mr. Trump’s attorneys. But the government’s side gave anal arguments. The Dems always are talking out their backsides.
17 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
janjan 4/26/2024 8:37:24 AM (No. 1706376)
Biden’s bribery crimes are personal acts and can still be prosecuted regardless of how this is decided by the SC. Trump ended up giving Hillary a pass. Will he do the same with Biden?
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
felixcat 4/26/2024 9:07:06 AM (No. 1706401)
Justice Kavanaugh - you already know the answer. Democrats and their RINO allies get all the protections of due process, immunity, forgotten memories (I don't recall), fawning news coverage , etc while Trump does not. Plus the Dems know that the GOP will NEVER wage lawfare against their political opposition the way they do.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
pensom2 4/26/2024 9:35:49 AM (No. 1706422)
The Court is really only considering immunity for a Republican President of the US. Any Dem POTUS already has de facto immunity by reason of the fact that the only prosecutor would be the Department of Justice, which is populated by rank leftists who would never indict or prosecute a democrat President. They wouldn't even indict James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, or Lisa Page for conspiring to overthrow the Trump presidency by perpetrating the Russia collusion hoax. Kevin Clinesmith, a gofer, low-level FBI attorney was charged as a sacrificial scapegoat, but upon being convicted, was given probation and a fine as his sole punishment after intentionally submitting falsified documents to the FISA Court and lying under oath to the FISA Court in order to obtain a search warrant against an American citizen.
17 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/26/2024 9:41:06 AM (No. 1706427)
Why hasn't Obama, Hillary, and Biden been charged for leading a conspiracy of the IC and DOJ to complete a coup of DJT?
14 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 4/26/2024 10:14:56 AM (No. 1706459)
Ask Smith et al what criteria is most appropriate for immunity that allows Obambi to order the execution of an US citizen and an innocent child without due process, Diaper Joe as a VP and Senator to store and share classified documents, but possession by Trump of documents in a secure location guarded by the Secret Service is a felony worth 20 years. If Smith wants to make a distinction and have a 'test' for granting immunity, then he and the Dept. of Just-Us has the golden opportunity to give e the Supreme Joke guidance. But I bet they can't come up with an acceptable one without clearly stating it must b e a two tier test. Justice for Democrats and Just-Us for the rest of us!
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
rytwng 4/26/2024 11:31:15 AM (No. 1706543)
Why hasn't the Beast Hillary been indicted?
10 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
formerNYer 4/26/2024 1:03:32 PM (No. 1706623)
Someone should ask, if Trump is being prosecuted for hiding the stormy Daniels story why isn't biden beuing indicted for hiding the Hunter laptop story?
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
danu 4/26/2024 4:16:27 PM (No. 1706743)
ouch! that one is going to leave a mark!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)