Breaking: Wisconsin Supreme Court Dismisses
Trump Lawsuit
The Election Wizard,
by
The Wiz
Original Article
Posted By: LeeBertie,
12/14/2020 1:14:26 PM
MADISON — In a 4-3 decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed President Trump’s lawsuit seeking to invalidate roughly 220,00 votes in Dane and Milwaukee counties. The court stated that it would not made a blanket invalidation of ballots cast under the status of indefinitely confined, as President Trump had sought. Regarding other challenged ballots, the court said President Trump waited too long in bringing his challenge. Corrections*
*Wide headlines must be split. Second headline removed from Intro. Post carefully or risk deletion.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
davew 12/14/2020 1:20:40 PM (No. 631621)
So the court held that if people falsely claimed indefinite confinement their their vote should not have been counted but because we don't really care to find out how many people invalidated their ballot you lose the election. Once again, the house is trying to take the hand without letting law abiding voters see the cards. Still looks like a crooked casino to me.
22 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
andyboy 12/14/2020 1:22:28 PM (No. 631623)
Massive fraud everywhere, and all the courts want to do is come up with procedural/technical reasons why they won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
anniebc 12/14/2020 1:23:23 PM (No. 631625)
How was he supposed to know just how they would cheat or how he would be defrauded? Makes no sense. Cheaters never win becomes cheaters always win. Just do it.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 12/14/2020 1:33:45 PM (No. 631640)
Judges are twisting and ignoring the law. Trump is gonna have to cancel this crap and use military tribunals.
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/14/2020 1:34:20 PM (No. 631642)
They would not go for BLANKET invalidation of all 215,000 or so mail-in votes when many were cast on ballots sent by election officials who “assumed” indefinite confinement because of Covid. The court did agree that the election officials erred in making that assumption. There is another article on that subject posted earlier from Epoch Times. Something will have to be done with those ballots as some may be legitimate. It was the blanket invalidation that the court ruled against.
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
BarryNo 12/14/2020 1:37:15 PM (No. 631643)
Too soon, no one has been affected... too late, its been a week since then. What have you been doing? No standing...
These courts fail the test of being impartial OR guided by the Constitution.
They are the SWAMP.
WE WILL DRAIN YOU
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/14/2020 1:37:23 PM (No. 631644)
FTA:
However, the court said a case-by-case determination must be made before tossing ballots
Those who post based upon the headline and/or a brief headline tend to beclown themselves. Read the articles!
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Catherine 12/14/2020 1:38:00 PM (No. 631646)
Wow # 4 - where have you been for the last four years. Everything happening now was telegraphed by the left over the past four years. They started with stating when Trump lost he wouldn't leave they would gleefully drag him out of the White House, etc., etc., They told us how they would do it and if you think all these judges, even Supreme Court judges, aren't being blackmailed and threatened, think again. One man, President Trump, is trying to stand up to them. One man. Like him or not, he is doing what he said he would do and fighting tooth and nail for us. Yes, there is fraud. No you don't get to see the stuff yet. Just be patient.
18 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
seamusm 12/14/2020 1:56:23 PM (No. 631666)
So there are is a time limit on Truth even if it takes time to discern it? I had thought our Republic which has been worth dying for should be worth waiting for.
9 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 12/14/2020 2:21:26 PM (No. 631683)
Excuse me #11, how do you know they are even looking at any of the evidence? Also, how do you explain the election in 2018 between Tony Evers and Scott Walker when at the midnight hour three to four bags come in. Just has a familiarity with the same things happening in the 2020 election. It just seems that the voting process has become so informal and unregulated that transparency and accountability is almost impossible. Like the mail-in ballots.
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Quigley 12/14/2020 2:35:54 PM (No. 631693)
They aren’t votes if they’re not legal.
If i gather slips of paper on which people write biden they aren’t votes.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
HonestDon 12/14/2020 2:41:45 PM (No. 631702)
Dirty, crooked, partisan, activist b'tards. The motto over the entrance to their court should area "The Law be Damned. WE decide!"
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Proud Texan 12/14/2020 2:44:44 PM (No. 631707)
My cat ate my homework!
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 12/14/2020 3:19:51 PM (No. 631739)
That's fine, it's on to the US Supreme Court and this time WITH Standing!
Dodge this one Judge John 'Judas' Roberts
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
stablemoney 12/14/2020 4:06:30 PM (No. 631789)
Waiting too long? That is slop for a decision. They have been counting since Nov 3. The electors only voted today. We have no justice system, and should not have to pay for it. Defund the DOJ and FBI.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
4Justice 12/14/2020 7:18:28 PM (No. 631973)
#14, you obviously don't get around much. The fraud is massive and you'd have to e blind and dead not to see it. Yes, it is extremely compelling evidence. And that doesn't even count the hundreds of eyewitness accounts that have signed sworn affidavits. One such account alone is considered proper evidence in any U.S. court of law. You have all these swing states changing election laws at the last minute outside of the proper channels (state legislatures are the only ones who can legally make those changes) and lowering the standards of verification and other security measures (e.g. signatures verified by machines only have to meet 40% match, which could basically be anything). You have late night drops of hundreds of boxes of ballots with no verifiable chain of custody. Hundreds of voters with Canadian mailing addresses (whose U.S. addresses are not legal residences). You have hundreds of deceased voters. Thousands of ballots with nothing marked but "Biden". GOP observers blocked from observing counters and being harassed. Ballots in USPS boxes being transported in personal vehicles, warehouses full of ballots with no security. People running the same ballots through machines up to 10 times each. Machines switching thousands of votes from Trump to Biden. All the other issues with software and hardware...And now we have more blank ballots found for GA that were shipped from AZ...WHY?
Those are only a few examples. How many more do you need?? Do I need to make a full list for you?? These are NOT opinions. They are real pieces of evidence found.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "LeeBertie"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Round and round we go.