Williams College Mathematician Flags up
to 100,000 Ballots in Pennsylvania
Epoch Times,
by
Jack Phillips
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/21/2020 10:00:53 AM
A professor of mathematics at Williams College, in a sworn affidavit, flagged nearly 100,000 ballots in Pennsylvania after analyzing election data and phone interviews.
Steven Miller, who specializes in analytic number theory and sabermetrics, said that one instance of possible fraud involved potential votes that weren’t counted and another instance involved ballots that may have been requested by a person other than the GOP-registered voter.
“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn statement (pdf), according to Just The News.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Mofongo 11/21/2020 10:20:59 AM (No. 612372)
Finally, something from my college to be proud of.
11 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
john56 11/21/2020 10:30:25 AM (No. 612387)
Its simple. The Dems underestimated the Trump total. Hence, vote counting was stopped in Pa, Mich, Wis, Ga, Az and Nev to add more Biden votes.
26 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird 11/21/2020 10:31:32 AM (No. 612390)
FTA:
Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor, an appointee of Trump, told the news outlet that Miller’s affidavit is evidence of potential voter fraud.
“This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election,” Trainor remarked. “Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters.”
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/21/2020 10:47:15 AM (No. 612413)
Your bank estimates your account balance between a few bucks and more bucks...based on sound math and statistics. You accept that as evidence?
2 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
planetgeo 11/21/2020 10:49:59 AM (No. 612415)
I'm a mathematician too. I have often remarked (seriously) that Democrats were born missing the Math gene. Fortunately for President Trump, we weren't. These election results are rife with massive statistical anomalies that not only imply fraud but also point to the specific methods that had to be used. Godspeed now to the teams digging for and assembling the evidence. Thank the ignorance of the Democrats for not realizing that their actions do indeed leave mathematical and systems fingerprints.
32 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mizzmac 11/21/2020 11:02:45 AM (No. 612436)
Must read please, Lucianne!
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
volksford 11/21/2020 11:40:56 AM (No. 612478)
Well , math is a science and it is going to be interesting to see a bunch of leftys become "science deniers"
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
davew 11/21/2020 1:04:40 PM (No. 612541)
A crowdsourced group in Zurich, Switzerland headed by a data analyst, Vincent K independently analyzed public databases and voter rolls and found hundreds of thousands of dead voters, people voting across multiple states, and voters with the same first, middle, last name, and date of birth that are listed as active voters and participated in this and prior elections. Some were even double voters with the same name and dob but different voter ids that voted more than once. They originally found 700,000 entries like this but by carefully distilling and eliminating things like juniors they reached a total of 160,000 in PA and MI alone.
He also identified voters who seemed to be sharing PO boxes particularly at universities where the number of voters using the box exceeded the number of students and faculty at the school. The way his group thinks the scheme worked was the fraudsters would order a mail in ballot for a real named voter to be sent to an address that they controlled which created a change request to the address stored online. Then they order another unsolicited ballot for the real voter sent to the correct original address which is then overwritten by the change request pending. This means 2 ballots get sent out, one for the fraudster and one to the real voter. The real voter does whatever they do to send it in, vote in person, or do nothing. After they have voted the fraudster submits the fraud ballot provisionally which overwrites the original real vote in the tally.
Here's a link to Vincent K's walk through of this today on Bannon's podcast.
https://youtu.be/k42uL2le2kg?t=3144
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bighambone 11/21/2020 1:20:47 PM (No. 612549)
When you find tens of thousands of mail-in ballots or more that only contain one vote, for Biden, with all the other candidates of both political parties listed below on those ballots receiving no votes, there has to be something wrong!
Any experienced voter knows that it only takes a second to mark one vote at the top of the a ballot, but takes much longer to mark all the other possible votes that are usually there for the asking on most comprehensive ballots. There is only one plausible reason for only a vote for Biden to show up on that massive amount of ballots, that the ballots are fraudulent with the perpetrators of the fraud scheme not having the huge amount of time necessary to mark all the possible votes on that amount of ballots. At this stage who knows if all those supposed ballots are not really actual counterfeits that were accepted and counted in the big Democrat run cities.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
OK state mom 11/21/2020 1:21:15 PM (No. 612551)
My prediction is the Supreme Court will throw the election to the House of Representatives. The vote is too corrupted.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
john56 11/21/2020 2:35:32 PM (No. 612596)
Again, the Dems figured the had stolen enough votes by mail ins. Until late election night and the Trump vote was stronger than anyone anticipated. It's a Box 13 scam on a larger scale (Box 13 refers to a ballot box still open in Jim Wells Co. Texas in the 1948 Dem Primary. LBJ's operatives realized they were going to be a few votes short and added 200 ballots to the count at Box 13. At least LBJ's pals had a sense of fair play. One of the 200 votes were cast for his opponent. Biden's goons weren't that charitable. )
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/21/2020 3:13:49 PM (No. 612614)
Why would the democrat Media deny fraud?
Why does big tech deny vote fraud?
Why does the radical left deny vote fraud?
Because THEYRE ALL liars cheaters thieves and FRAUDS themselves
A cabal of fraud
A coup of fraud
All of it right before your eyes
Satan and Soros are smiling
God is not....
7 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Safari Man 11/22/2020 7:43:52 AM (No. 613021)
Follow what the scientists say.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)