Susan Rice's resurfaced 2017 comments
denying knowledge of Trump
team surveillance raise eyebrows
Fox News,
by
Joseph A. Wulfsohn
Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly,
5/20/2020 4:04:42 AM
A three-year-old interview clip of former National Security Adviser Susan Rice resurfaced Tuesday after the declassified email she sent to herself on the final day of the Obama administration was released.
During an April 2017 appearance on PBS News Hour, Rice was asked about the then-breaking revelations about members of President Trump's transition team having been surveilled before he took office.
"In the last few hours, we've been following a disclosure by the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes, that in essence, during the final days of the Obama administration, during the transition after President Trump had been elected, that he and the people
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 5/20/2020 6:06:24 AM (No. 416564)
I thought I read somewhere that Yates testified that Susan Rice was not in that meeting??????
6 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 5/20/2020 7:19:23 AM (No. 416602)
She's the affirmative-action stooge that the 'Rats regularly push out to lie for them.
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Bluefindad 5/20/2020 7:40:33 AM (No. 416620)
If it weren't for lies, these people would have nothing to say.
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rinktum 5/20/2020 8:09:24 AM (No. 416641)
The left will say whatever they feel is beneficial and their supporters and media allies will nod and take it as the gospel truth. There will be no curiosity, no fact checking just complete faith that it is true. With all the evidence that has been revealed so far, these miscreants should be hounded mercilessly by the media, but they are not because the media is there to protect them and the narrative. At this point if there were a video tape of the planning of this conspiracy to spy in order to remove a duly elected President, the media would find an excuse to deny it. They are that committed to thIs big lie.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 5/20/2020 8:29:03 AM (No. 416657)
Susan Rice was/is Obama's National Lying Adviser.
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 5/20/2020 8:37:46 AM (No. 416666)
I've never seen a "woman" who had a more manly face.
Is Susie some sort of "transgender"? Really creepy.
5 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
planetgeo 5/20/2020 9:14:56 AM (No. 416716)
Susan Rice was like Obama's Swiss Army Knife for lies. She could tell litte ones, big ones, screwy ones, and weird squiggly ones that nobody could even tell what they were good for. Exactly what Obama needed for those Sunday morning truth-whittling shows.
10 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Strike3 5/20/2020 9:28:13 AM (No. 416738)
Why? Everybody who worked for Obama was a known liar involved in criminal activities. Rice wasn't a particulary good liar but she still did it. Barry could convince the media of almost anything but we were onto him from the beginning. Muslims lie, that's one of their primary tools.
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
VegasGrump 5/20/2020 9:32:44 AM (No. 416744)
Why do all of these people still have "spokesmen" when they are no longer in government? Who picks up the tab for them?
7 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 5/20/2020 10:02:04 AM (No. 416781)
If I had a choice of Rice I would choose Condoleezza.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Arby 5/20/2020 10:19:45 AM (No. 416797)
The Durham focus is likely to be on Comey, who appears to be the lynchpin for all things evil and slimey, but I would keep a close eye on the august Fauxbama's minions--Rice and Power. They're both like evil servants straight out of Shakespeare, willing to do their master's bidding. Brennan and Clapper are known liars and should be at the center of the investigation also, but let's cast that net broadly, because the chicanery was everywhere.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
stablemoney 5/20/2020 10:31:56 AM (No. 416821)
I did notice the original redactions had nothing to do with national security, or methods. When will the redactors be prosecuted for illegitimate redactions?
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
clayusmcret 5/20/2020 11:49:36 AM (No. 416905)
These are all records and transcripts that Hillary's team was supposed to destroy.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 5/20/2020 12:04:57 PM (No. 416930)
Susan Rice's only discernible job skill is the ability to lie with a straight face. She is a typical Affirmative Action 'winner', no skills, no brains. But she can lie with a straight face....but she still isn't convincing.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 5/20/2020 2:14:39 PM (No. 417078)
Soon to be “fried rice”.....
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MickTurn 5/20/2020 2:34:05 PM (No. 417088)
Rice smells convictions...she is doing her best to Cover her Arse, BIG TIME!
By the way, Obama doing everything 'by the Book' means the Saul Alynski's Rules for Radicals BOOK!
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 5/20/2020 7:43:09 PM (No. 417242)
Susan Rice was not in the private meeting between Obama, Comey and Yates.
However, she felt it necessary to write a memo, 15 days later, from her notes? If so, she has notes which need to be turned over.
It's now being reported she was instructed by WH Counsel (Baker, perhaps) to write that memo, but why would they direct it to be written?
And, if it's Baker, remember, he is reported to have flipped and cooperating with Durham, so many of these people would be wise to stop talking since they are likely in legal trouble already.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)