Post New Article

Dems’ Impeachment Trickery

Original Article

Posted By: Garnet, 12/4/2019 9:38:45 AM

On Wednesday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) takes over as ringmaster for the ongoing impeachment show. He’s billing his opening act as an inquiry into the “historical and constitutional basis of impeachment” and “the Framers’ intent.” Nadler claims he’ll be looking into what the Constitution’s authors meant by “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Don’t be fooled by Nadler’s scholarly posturing. He isn’t planning a civics lesson. Democrats are hell-bent on impeaching Trump, so Nadler has to rewrite American history and massage the meaning of the Constitution’s impeachment clause to fit the pile of non-evidence Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee has produced.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Quigley 12/4/2019 10:14:56 AM (No. 252427)
When the mad, mad no-nad comes wad, wad waddling along. Along. He'll take no sh*t Cause he's a mad no-nad all along. Along. Wake up, wake up you sleepy head. Go back, go back to bed. Go waddle somewhere else.
1 person likes this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: bad-hair 12/4/2019 10:19:35 AM (No. 252437)
So we get an education on what the framers meant ? You don't suppose that an intellectual of Nadler's stature could possibly screw this up ?
4 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: HotRod 12/4/2019 10:32:07 AM (No. 252455)
Nadler has already screwed up the program. Why in the world does he think Americans want to hear from left-wing, Trump-hating, compromised academic ''professors,'' who have already declared that President Trump should be impeached? They reportedly made those declarations right after President Trump was elected. Also, the American people understand that Nadler would not bring these people to testify if they were not going to support the democrats. Not only that, but the democrats have already declared that they will impeach President Trump, before any hearings took place!\ What a joke! The democrats are slaves to the radical monster they created, which is not large enough to deliver an election. The independent voters would have been a better target, if the democrats could have brought themselves to actually do some positive legislation for the country. That's not even talking about what is happening among black and Hispanic voters that the democrats have always taken for granted!
3 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: hurricanegirl 12/4/2019 4:50:42 PM (No. 252769)
I can only assume that the Federalists Papers, written by some of the Founding Fathers themselves, are irrelevant, right? While this three-ring circus drags on and we laugh, I fear they're doing exactly what they have planned--overthrowing the president and taking over the country. Will we actually get to vote come next November? If they succeed in railroading Trump, who will we vote for (cause it won't be Trump; he'll be disqualified)?
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Garnet"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Garnet"
Kamala Harris should never
have run for president
29 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/4/2019 12:29:15 PM Post Reply
California Sen. Kamala Harris should never have run for president in the first place. Her ambition far exceeded her ability. She hadn’t yet established herself in the U.S. Senate. And she hadn’t exactly excelled in her previous job as California’s attorney general. There wasn’t much of a record worth bragging about on the campaign trail. After being elected to the Senate in a 2016 cakewalk, she should have spent the next three years focused exclusively on representing Californians in Congress, helping the state on such vital issues as water development, environmental protection, healthcare and homelessness. But people around her — political advisors and her sister Maya Harris
Kamala Harris Goes Down Fighting 14 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/4/2019 10:16:09 AM Post Reply
Unbridled ambition and aggression have their place in presidential politics – as the man in the Oval Office reminded the nation in 2016 -- but in the case of California freshman Sen. Kamala Harris, they weren’t enough to overcome the lack of a clear policy vision. The candidate who threw some of the hardest punches on the debate stage ended her presidential bid after high hopes faded amid a string of underwhelming results. Her quest concluded with an open letter. Her campaign, Harris admitted Tuesday, is broke.“My campaign for president simply doesn’t have the financial resources we need to continue,” she told supporters just 62 days before absentee ballots
Dems’ Impeachment Trickery 4 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/4/2019 9:38:45 AM Post Reply
On Wednesday, House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) takes over as ringmaster for the ongoing impeachment show. He’s billing his opening act as an inquiry into the “historical and constitutional basis of impeachment” and “the Framers’ intent.” Nadler claims he’ll be looking into what the Constitution’s authors meant by “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Don’t be fooled by Nadler’s scholarly posturing. He isn’t planning a civics lesson. Democrats are hell-bent on impeaching Trump, so Nadler has to rewrite American history and massage the meaning of the Constitution’s impeachment clause to fit the pile of non-evidence Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee has produced.
Kellyanne Conway, Playing Chicken
With Adam Schiff?
3 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/3/2019 11:02:08 AM Post Reply
Kellyanne Conway has promised to represent President Trump at upcoming impeachment hearings, but only if the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is called to testify. “Is Adam Schiff going to testify? Because he is a fact witness. That would be great,” the senior Trump adviser had told reporters on Monday. And then Conway made an offer: “I’ll tell you what, if Adam Schiff testifies, I’ll show up on behalf of the White House.”Conway still has time to swerve in this game of political chicken, since the House Judiciary Committee begins hearings on Wednesday. But don’t expect a crash on Capitol Hill as Schiff has already dismissed Republican calls
Fusion GPS Chiefs Spin Hard
Before the Horowitz Report
3 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/3/2019 10:57:47 AM Post Reply
There are a few bombshells tucked in the new book authored by Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, co-owners of Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm responsible for the most infamous dossier in American political history. Here’s one that—as far as I know—hasn’t been disclosed until now: Before Fusion hired Christopher Steele in 2016 to produce his sketchy dossier on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, Steele hired Fusion to help him with a client at odds with a key figure in the Trump camp. The London-based operative, misleadingly portrayed in the press as a mere former British intelligence officer, needed help investigating the Trump advisor for his client.
Why the Democrats Can’t
Settle for Censure
4 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/2/2019 5:09:05 AM Post Reply
Their rhetoric notwithstanding, congressional Democrats understand that their chances of ousting President Trump from office are infinitesimal. There are a few, like AOC and “the Squad,” who still cling to the pipe dream that Trump will be impeached, convicted, and perp-walked out of the White House for multifarious yet oddly ill-defined crimes. More realistic Democrats understand that this is never going to happen, but they also know that mere censorship of the president is not an option if they wish to avoid a revolt by the left wing of their congressional caucus and voter apathy that could manifest itself in low turnout next November.
Still upset by Trump's
historic win? Beat him if
you can in 2020
4 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/1/2019 10:46:16 AM Post Reply
Writer Nancy Cook detailed in a recent Politico article that, counter to the tradition of past presidents, Donald J. Trump apparently has decided — on his own, shockingly — to circumvent the fish-bowl exposure of the Oval Office and West Wing and conduct meetings and phone calls that demand privacy and strict confidentiality in the privacy of his residence in the White House. There, away from the prying eyes of the media — and, as we have come to learn, certain staff members who may be pursuing agendas counter to his — the president can conduct some of the nation’s business with at least a bit more comfort and seclusion.
Chaos and contagion: How
Trump accelerates democratic dysfunction
11 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/1/2019 10:42:12 AM Post Reply
The impeachment hearings last week demonstrated the rising risk of American polarization and democratic dysfunction. This political divide is undermining the integrity of the American experiment and its political, economic and values-based leadership of the global order. While dysfunction and chaos can be contagious, President Donald Trump is an accelerant. Dr. Fiona Hill warned in her testimony last Thursday, “Some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.”
Is John Roberts Up To a Senate
Impeachment Trial?
16 replies
Posted by Garnet 11/26/2019 5:16:30 AM Post Reply
The Democrats have manifestly failed to build the national consensus necessary to remove a sitting president from office. The “impeachment inquiry” decreed by Nancy Pelosi in late September, combined with Adam Schiff’s inequitable conduct of the subsequent public hearings, have produced the reverse of their intended result. Several reliable voter surveys show that they weakened support for impeachment among Independent voters, particularly those in crucial swing states, while hardening support for the president among Republicans. Yet the Democratic leadership is clearly determined to pass articles of impeachment against Trump, without regard to the legal merits or the misgivings of “moderate” members of their own caucus.
The Trump Impeachment Theme Song:
'Is That All There Is?'
5 replies
Posted by Garnet 11/25/2019 8:53:43 AM Post Reply
Cue Peggy Lee. The theme song of the Democratic conflagration known as the Trump impeachment hearings is now “Is That All There Is?” I remember when I was a very little girl, our house caught on fire… I stood there shivering in my pajamas and watched the whole world go up in flames And when it was all over I said to myself, is that all there is to a fire? Is that all there is to an attempt to overthrow the president of the United States? Just a bunch of bureaucrats who felt overlooked? Because if there is more to it than that, I haven’t seen the evidence.
Rust Belt voters on Trump: ‘I’d vote
for him again in a heartbeat’
8 replies
Posted by Garnet 11/25/2019 8:45:55 AM Post Reply
JEFFERSON, Ohio — Bonnie Smith no longer sets her alarm for 1:45 a.m. so she could head into town to make her heavenly pastries, cookies and cakes. It’s the only thing she doesn’t miss about her bakery, which she had to close last June. “My eyesight was failing. I just couldn’t do it anymore, or at least until the doctors could figure out what was going on,” said Smith, who hopes that eye surgery will allow her to bake professionally in her home kitchen sometime next month.
Impeachment: 3 Crucial Questions,
3 Answers, So Far
4 replies
Posted by Garnet 11/23/2019 10:49:46 AM Post Reply
Assessing the Democrats’ impeachment drive depends on answers to three crucial questions: 1) What did President Trump really want from Ukraine?2) Can Democrats prove he wanted something so improper, so lawless that it meets the high bar for "high crimes and misdemeanors," bribery, or treason? 3) What’s the rush? Do voters think the charges are so serious, the proof so convincing, and the need to remove the president so urgent that it cannot wait until the election next November? Question 1: What did the president want from Ukraine?
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
FYI from Hillary: I am not a lesbian 44 replies
Posted by MissMolly 12/5/2019 4:17:49 AM Post Reply
A little something to cleanse the palate. She said this in an interview today with Howard Stern, which makes it slightly less weird since chatter about lesbians is like 40 percent of the content on that show. Or at least it was when I was a regular listener a million years ago. (In fairness to Stern, she’s the one who brings it up.) He went easy on her by not asking the obvious follow-up: What were you doing at Epstein’s ranch, then? She should consider this a missed opportunity, as a surprise admission of bisexuality would have helped add a little more “diversity” to an upcoming Democratic debate.
Male Transjacking Will
Ultimately End Women’s Sports
39 replies
Posted by M2 12/5/2019 6:29:29 AM Post Reply
This Friday, the top four NCAA Division III women’s soccer teams face off in the national semifinals. One of the final four teams’ goalkeepers, Isa Berardo, is a male transgender playing as a female for Pomona-Pitzer Colleges. Not surprisingly, the male goalie has dominated the field against opposing female players, giving his own a chance to win the national championship thanks to his physical advantages in a key position. This is increasingly happening throughout women’s sports, at all levels from elementary school through professional competitions. It’s creating not equality, but inequality.
WATCH: Viral Video Shows Men Going Over Wall
Trump Said ‘Can’t Be Climbed’ in Mere Seconds
39 replies
Posted by Harlowe 12/4/2019 11:33:02 AM Post Reply
A viral video published by Deseret Sun photojournalist J. Omar Ornelas shows two men using a ladder to defeat the replacement border fence that President Donald Trump said “can’t be climbed.” In September, Trump visited the Otay Mesa border site to extol the virtues of the replacement barrier that’s being installed there, and went on an extended riff about how difficult the fence would be to climb. Trump said the wall had been tested by “world-class mountain climbers,” and referenced “pictures of young people climbing walls with drugs on their back--a lot of drugs.”
Trans Activist Jessica Yaniv Furious:
Gynecologist Refuses to Treat Him
Because He's a Biological Male
39 replies
Posted by Hazymac 12/4/2019 9:30:44 AM Post Reply
On Monday, the transgender activist who goes by the name of Jessica Yaniv angrily informed his Twitter followers that a gynecologists refused to treat him or any other "transgender patients." This shocked Jessica. "Are they allowed to do that, legally?" he wondered out loud. "So a gynaecologist office that I got referred to literally told me today that 'we don't serve transgender patients,'" Yaniv writes on Twitter. "And me, being me, I'm shocked.. and confused... and hurt. Are they allowed to do that, legally? Isn't that against the college practices?" So a gynaecologist office that I got referred to literally told me today that "we don't serve transgender
Nancy Pelosi Announces Democrats
Will Begin Drafting Articles of Impeachment
37 replies
Posted by M2 12/5/2019 9:40:39 AM Post Reply
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Thursday that the House Judiciary Committee will begin drafting articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. “The president’s actions have seriously violated the constitution,” Pelosi said in a press conference on Capitol Hill. “Our Democracy is at stake. The president leaves us no choice but to act.”
Hillary Clinton to Howard Stern: 'Contrary
to what you might hear, I actually like men'
34 replies
Posted by LittleHoodedMonk 12/4/2019 6:34:39 PM Post Reply
Hillary Clinton quashed long-running rumors that she’s a closeted lesbian during an interview with Howard Stern on Wednesday. “Well, contrary to what you might hear, I actually like men,” the former secretary of state joked on Mr. Stern’s Sirius/XM radio program. The shock jock asked Mrs. Clinton to raise her right hand and swear to never having a “lesbian affair.” “Never, never, never!” the former presidential candidate said, laughing. “Never even been tempted, thank you very much.” Mrs. Clinton added that she was “pretty popular” growing up and that getting dates (with men) was never a problem for her.
John Kerry endorses Joe
Biden for president
30 replies
Posted by Imright 12/5/2019 1:11:11 PM Post Reply
Former Secretary of State John F. Kerry endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden's presidential candidacy on Thursday. “I believe Joe Biden is the President our country desperately needs right now, not because I’ve known Joe so long, but because I know Joe so well. I’ve never before seen the world more in need of someone who on day one can begin the incredibly hard work of putting back together the world Donald Trump has smashed apart," Kerry said in a statement, according to the Biden campaign. "There’s never been a time more urgent for leadership at home that can work for the middle class and tackle existential issues
Nancy Pelosi erupts 'Don't mess with me!'
when reporter asks if she Hates
Donald Trump—as she insists she
prays for him during impeachment fight*
30 replies
Posted by Imright 12/5/2019 12:53:36 PM Post Reply
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi erupted Thursday at a reporter who asked if she hates President Donald Trump. Pelosi had two hours earlier publicly told House Democrats to draft articles of impeachment to try to remove the president from office.'Do you hate the president, Madam Speaker?' asked James Rosen, a longtime correspondent for Fox News who is now with Sinclair Broadcasting.Pelosi, typically even-tempered, abandoned her measured speaking and became visibly angry. 'I pray for the president all the time,' she shot back. 'So don't mess with me when it comes to words like that.'
Kamala Harris should never
have run for president
29 replies
Posted by Garnet 12/4/2019 12:29:15 PM Post Reply
California Sen. Kamala Harris should never have run for president in the first place. Her ambition far exceeded her ability. She hadn’t yet established herself in the U.S. Senate. And she hadn’t exactly excelled in her previous job as California’s attorney general. There wasn’t much of a record worth bragging about on the campaign trail. After being elected to the Senate in a 2016 cakewalk, she should have spent the next three years focused exclusively on representing Californians in Congress, helping the state on such vital issues as water development, environmental protection, healthcare and homelessness. But people around her — political advisors and her sister Maya Harris
George Zimmerman SUES Trayvon Martin's
family and Florida prosecutors for $100
MILLION, claiming they engineered false
evidence in his homicide trial for shooting
dead the unarmed black teen in 2012
28 replies
Posted by ladydawgfan 12/4/2019 1:59:42 PM Post Reply
George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who was acquitted in the 2012 fatal shooting of unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin, is suing Martin's family and Florida prosecutors, claiming that they engineered false evidence in the homicide trial. The lawsuit to be filed Wednesday in Polk County Circuit Court seeks $100million in civil damages for defamation, abuse of civil process and conspiracy. It alleges that the prosecution's key witness in Zimmerman's 2013 murder trial, Rachel Jeantel, was an imposter coached by the family and their lawyers. The lead defendant in the suit is Sybrina Fulton, Martin's mother. Fulton gained national notoriety as an advocate for social justice
Gay activists turn on Pete Buttigieg
over Salvation Army ties
28 replies
Posted by Pluperfect 12/4/2019 5:09:48 AM Post Reply
Pete Buttigieg has been outed — as someone who has worked with the Salvation Army. According to a report Tuesday in Out magazine, the South Bend mayor has several times participated in Red Kettle Ring Off for the Christmas season in the Indiana city. Out linked to reports of the annual charity in local South Bend media from 2015 and 2017, and at least one other photo from 2016 surfaced on Twitter. In 2018, he held the annual Mayor’s Night Out — an open-listening event to let residents quiz city officials — at a Salvation Army community center.
Rep. Al Green howls about no black
faces among the screaming leftist professors
27 replies
Posted by PageTurner 12/5/2019 7:35:44 AM Post Reply
Poor Al Green. All that lefty scream-mongering at the congressional impeachment hearings and no minorities to show for it. According to Fox News, the Texas Democrat actually said this: A Texas congressman slammed his fellow Democrats Wednesday after “not one person of color” was called as an expert to testify during the first day of impeachment hearings conducted by the House Judiciary Committee. Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, rebuked his colleagues in a speech on the House floor before the committee hearing began. Three legal scholars later testified at the request of Democrats in the first Judiciary Committee impeachment inquiry hearing. Jonathan Turley, a professor
Post New Article