Megan Fox Defends Letting Her
6-Year-Old Son Wear Dresses
To School
Daily Wire,
by
Paul Bois
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
9/22/2019 5:34:10 PM
After revealing her appreciation for motherhood last week, "Transformers" actress Megan Fox then defended her decision to let her 6-year-old son Noah wear dresses to school. Speaking with "The Talk" last Thursday, Megan Fox said that her son sometimes wants to wear dresses to his "liberal, hippy" school, and she allows him to pick the outfit he desires despite the ridicule he faces from other boys. "Sometimes, he'll dress himself and he likes to wear dresses, sometimes," Fox said,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Highlander 9/22/2019 5:37:55 PM (No. 186622)
Great, mom. Just great. You just guaranteed years on the psychiatrist’s couch for that boy. Damned stupid liberal ditz!
33 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 9/22/2019 5:38:35 PM (No. 186623)
I guess baby daddy can care less.
23 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
watashiyo 9/22/2019 5:52:02 PM (No. 186630)
Kid starting early as Transformer.
16 people like this.
Dear God, where are these children’s fathers?
25 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Northcross 9/22/2019 6:09:07 PM (No. 186639)
Not being content with their own perversions, liberals have to push it on their own offspring.
24 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Krause 9/22/2019 6:12:31 PM (No. 186641)
Sounds like she might have wanted a girl instead of a boy, so this is the next best step...I guess.
10 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 9/22/2019 6:32:04 PM (No. 186648)
Whack job mom, raising up a whack job kid. He is going to have a really sad, destructive life if he continues down this hellish, false road his idiot of a mother has put him onto.
22 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/22/2019 6:52:47 PM (No. 186662)
Child abuse. Pure and simple.
20 people like this.
Forgive me for this. I read an article awhile back about disgusting actors we all know. She was on the list. This comment by her told me that being "real" in Hollyweird is akin to just another sick side of many of their personalities best not known.
“I’m horrible to live with. I don’t clean. My clothes end up wherever I take them off. I forget to flush the toilet. Friends will tell me, “Megan, you totally pinched a loaf in my toilet and didn’t flush.” —FHM, June 2007
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
fhancock 9/22/2019 7:13:21 PM (No. 186670)
A boy named Sue...what could gone wrong...STUPID is too nice of a word
13 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
janjan 9/22/2019 7:53:51 PM (No. 186678)
Over entitled mediocre actress reveals her perverted views of the world that she is forcing onto a 6 year old child. I would say call CPS but this is California. They would support it.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
YorkieMom 9/22/2019 9:36:22 PM (No. 186718)
Hollywood has come a long way. In the wrong direction.
5 people like this.
Somebody had to buy those dresses and put them in his closet. Does she have an adam's apple or a thyroid problem?
We really don't what does on in your house.
1 person likes this.
Apologies. That was suppose to say "don't care"
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Scout Finch 9/23/2019 12:06:08 AM (No. 186751)
As is most often the case with mothers like Megan, it's all about HER. See how accepting and wonderful SHE is? Poor kid. No doubt he'll be featured in People magazine and thrown into cameras for the daily alphabet "news" programs.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Annie Xango 9/23/2019 12:32:48 AM (No. 186760)
I wonder what his "normal: at least I always thought so..Brian Austin Green?? thinks about this..maybe they can have play dates with Charlize Theron's kids..!!!
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Annie Xango 9/23/2019 12:33:56 AM (No. 186761)
erm....forgot the word...father
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
PChristopher 9/23/2019 1:31:12 AM (No. 186774)
That kid is gong to develop some serious problems if he isn't removed from that house. He'll likely take out his anger and hostility in a gun-free zone.
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
lakerman1 9/23/2019 5:59:33 AM (No. 186807)
Back in Victorian times, little boys wore dresses for formal occasions, family portraits - Woodrow Wilson wore dresses exclusively until age 9. Plenty of photographic evidence.
Many young children have a need for attention. There are different ways to obtain that attention, directed by parents, teachers, pastor/rabbis,priests.
This Fox lad is lacking parental attention, I suspect. This is the age of parental inattention. (I was in a restaurant a while back, saw a young woman, eating and texting, with her baby, perhaps a year olf, staring at the flashing lights of a little device. One year olds should be exploring the u8niverse, as their brains develop. Sad.
The worst proposal coming from most of the D presidential wannabes is government run universal pre-school, beginning at age 3 or even younger. Just think how those teachers could mold those young minds, perhaps in an unfortunate way.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Sam1 9/23/2019 6:14:01 AM (No. 186810)
This is in England, but will be coming here soon.. first to California then throughout the Country:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7490415/Children-young-SIX-given-compulsory-self-touching-lessons.html#comments
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)