Jeffrey Epstein Should Cancel
the Culture’s Humbert Humberts
National Review,
by
Kyle Smith
Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly,
7/10/2019 4:56:33 AM
Perhaps the most historic, in the sense of era-defining, moment in the history of the Academy Awards was that standing ovation Roman Polanski got when he was given Best Director honors in 2003. There they are, leading Hollywood liberals, leaping to their feet to cheer for a man who, at age 43, gave a 13-year-old girl Quaaludes for the purpose of having sex with her and sodomizing her. Polanski suffered in no significant way for his crime, and today it seems obvious he should at the very least be denied the highest honor his profession can bestow.
In 2018, Polanski (along with Bill Cosby) was expelled from the Academy
"But things don't always stay the same, or get worse, Sometimes attitudes take a turn for the conservative."
This is why I am thrilled to see democrats railing about how terrible Acosta was for making this deal. It will be hard for them to back down from that stand when their "faves" are being prosecuted. Let's get them all on tape demanding Acosta and prosecutors like him must be condemned.
8 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
jasonB 7/10/2019 7:03:38 AM (No. 119320)
Someone gave Acosta the stand down order. Name the names. R or D, I don't care.
This whole thing is vile. Prison and ropes should all be on the table.
15 people like this.
I don’t think he gets it. I think one of two things is happening here.
Either it’s another attempt to take down Trump which will fail but will engulf a lot of liberals or Hillary is making noises behind the scenes about running. Liberals hate her for losing a rigged election and the Obamas just hate her and Bill. This is a warning to her to sit down and be quiet.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
gone2pot 7/10/2019 7:38:41 AM (No. 119351)
It doesn't matter what facts come out like it didn't matter that the Steele dossier was proven to be made up information paid for by Hillary in January, 2017. It didn't matter that Comey and Mueller KNEW it was a fake document in May, 2016. They still got the corrupt FISA judges to issue them a warrant against an innocent man, Carter Page. So, pray tell, what makes anyone think that all this Epstein stuff will be nothing more than the deep state making Orange Man Bad a pedophile until November, 2020? (For Rio Lindans-and sadly Rush as well, the Marxist propagandists are already tying Trump to Epstein and already creating the new Orange Man Bad is a pedophile meme. Who saw that coming? DUUUHHHHH)
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 7/10/2019 7:49:48 AM (No. 119356)
Show me a pervert and I’ll show you a democrat.........
10 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/10/2019 9:54:33 AM (No. 119507)
Just like the original Lolita, many of the girls involved are not innocent victims. They want the good life and are willing to pay the price. Unscrupulous people like Epstein, Menendez and Bent Willy are enablers. There are hundreds of rich Arabs, Asians and Europeans living the same lifestyle using money, coercion and outright slavery in the process.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
gop_guys 7/10/2019 9:57:25 AM (No. 119512)
There is a special place in he11 for these child molesters. Child trafficking is a scourge on this nation, second only to murdering babies living in their mother’s tummy. May all the names of these men and women (Hillary) who travelled on the Lolita Express be exposed whether Dem or Pubbie!
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
poliposter 7/10/2019 10:32:16 AM (No. 119556)
I disagree #6, first and foremost, they are children and the men who exploited them are adults. They are often needy in some way. Broken families. I believe I read that Giuffre was discovered shoeless outside the trailer she and her mother lived in. These girls, and they ARE girls, maybe be precocious, but they are still victims.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
john56 7/10/2019 10:51:25 AM (No. 119589)
Any man should be able to do the math. Sixty going into twelve equals twenty-five-to-life.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
StormCnter 7/10/2019 10:54:52 AM (No. 119590)
#6, you've posted similar comments on other Epstein threads. I wonder if you would feel that way if the girls were your daughters or sisters?
5 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
NotaBene 7/10/2019 10:59:34 AM (No. 119600)
This is a poorly written article par for the new awful National Review. They have become the enemy of the conservative. The purpose of this word salad by this young nobody was to write Epstein, Clinton and our MAGA Champion in the same sentence. And Rich Lowry approved it. The Fifth Column at work.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 7/10/2019 11:54:50 AM (No. 119659)
#4 & 11 – I was wondering where this rambling NR article was headed until this quote jumped out: “Epstein’s habits were so unremarkable that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump were happy to be associated with him. Clinton and Trump were not outliers. They were simply symptoms of a disease.”
On the night this story broke even Fox News showed the old photo of President Trump and Melania (at the time dating) with Epstein and a woman, while talking about Clinton and Epstein’s long association. Words and picture did not match. They acted like this 2002 Mar-a-largo photo was the only picture any news outlet had of Jeffrey Epstein. No one ever reports that just a few years after this photo Trump kicked Jeffy out the club because of his public pedo behavior.
This degrading attempt to equate Donald Trump to Bill Clinton is even more disgusting than a Bush cousin keeping a secret tape recording of a set-up conversation for a decade, just in case the Uniparty needed to “take out” DJT someday. This vile attempt will also boomerang back on the traitorous Swamp. It has plunged my cold anger deep into Artic temps, and I doubt I’m not the only Trumper who will follow him into Hell with a bucket of water if he asks it for our country.
Bring it. Its MAGA time.
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Strike3 7/10/2019 12:42:38 PM (No. 119699)
How do the liberal muslim apologists excuse mohammed? Preying on young girls is an age-old phenomenon that has many reasons. The practice of old royalty victimizing younger women is common and these entitled billionaires consider themselves royalty.
You can't tell me that the hollywood versions of this story, especially the Weinstein victims, did not know what was going to happen when they walked through his door. Yes, it is much more likely that Epstein's human trafficking concerned third world girls that were poor and/or hungry. In many cases their parents sell them and in some cases the girls choose a nice apartment and expensive clothes knowing full well that prostitution will be expected. Not every country is like America and not every girl in the world has so many choices. Epstein took advantage, that does not make his crimes any less despicable.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)