Post New Article

The Supreme Court Just Ruled On
The Census Citizenship Question

Original Article

Posted By: Imright, 6/27/2019 11:20:41 AM

The Supreme Court ordered further proceedings in the dispute over a citizenship question on the 2020 census form Thursday, saying the Trump administration apparently concealed its true reason for adding the query. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the Court’s opinion, portions of which were unanimous. “It is rare to review a record as extensive as the one before us when evaluating informal agency action — and it should be,” Roberts wrote. “But having done so for the sufficient reasons we have explained, we cannot ignore the disconnect between the decision made and the explanation given. Our review is deferential, but we are “not required to exhibit a naiveté

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: winmag 6/27/2019 11:27:54 AM (No. 108026)
What kind of dirt to the dems have on Roberts? He is a total waste. Please resign and let Trump pick a new judge.
16 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: qr4j 6/27/2019 11:29:23 AM (No. 108028)
So why is it okay to ask on a census form what race or gender one is? We don't base representation in government on either of those attributes.
19 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Refried 6/27/2019 11:42:34 AM (No. 108035)
Roberts is as worthless as Dubya was.
22 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: aasilver 6/27/2019 11:45:06 AM (No. 108037)
Ask the basic question - what is the purpose of the census? It is to determine representation of the people and to determine distribution of tax revenue. Neither one of these basic reasons should be influenced by non-citizens. Why are we wasting 10's of millions of dollars on the census? Do the 5 judges that voted against the citizenship issue have ANY common sense. NO!!!!!
11 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: Readaholic 6/27/2019 11:47:15 AM (No. 108041)
#3 is absolutely right. And to think we were relieved that we got Roberts instead of Harriet Miers. No difference after all.
9 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: stablemoney 6/27/2019 11:51:32 AM (No. 108044)
Mr. Roberts, what about the other questions on the census. If an innocuous question like "are you a citizen" cannot be asked, I really cannot see how any of the other questions can be asked. Certainly ALL the questions deserve the same scrutiny as the citizenship question, Mr. Roberts.
8 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Jubal 6/27/2019 11:57:25 AM (No. 108047)
This is Rip van Winkle and I had a question, but it's been answered. I was wondering what happened to Justice Kennedy, but — no problem, that Roberts fellow seems like a good replacement.
7 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: john56 6/27/2019 12:05:44 PM (No. 108053)
Okay. I'm just going to answer name, address and age stuff. Anything else obviously is unconstitutional. Roberts reprises his Obamacare bailout role.
7 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: bighambone 6/27/2019 12:07:47 PM (No. 108054)
When you go behind all the legal delay and trickery, this time going into the deliberative process behind the decision of the Trump Administration decision to place the perfectly reasonable citizenship question on the 2020 Census what do your have? The reason that the Trump Administration wanted that question on the Census was so that it could be determined how many US citizens and how many aliens are actually in the country and where they are living. Common sense will tell you that very few US Citizens are going to refuse to respond to the Census because of that question. The leftist and liberal Democrats do not want the citizenship question on the Census, because they claim that millions of aliens who the Democrats claim to represent will refuse to answer the Census and therefore will not be counted because they do not want to disclose the fact that they are non-citizens, with about 22 million of them being in the country illegally. If that were to happen it would adversely impact the Democrat run big city immigrant and low income communities where congressional districts have been moved over the years, through Congressional District reapportionment, based upon the total census figures from prior Censuses. That would mean that the Democrats would have a harder time winning those seats if they were again reapportioned to much less Democrat politically dominant areas of the country, based upon only the population figures of US citizens, and if they were moved to a different State the corresponding Electoral College vote would also be moved. In addition such a possible under count would affect the amount of federal money being send to those Democrat dominant inner city communities. When you get to the bottom line, what all this this boils down to is should Congressional District lines continue to be reapportioned and drawn based upon the total population figures of an area, consisting of both US citizens, and aliens who cannot vote, with up to half the alien population consisting of illegal aliens, or should future Congressional District lines be drawn based only upon the numbers of US citizens counted in each Congressional District to ensure the equal Congressional representation of US citizens across the USA? Clearly, for now at least the Supreme Court ducked that issue.
10 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: web 6/27/2019 12:32:14 PM (No. 108079)
Beyond asking how many in the household, the only other questions that are relevant to the census are: are you a citizen, or are you a legal immigrant. We need to know how many citizens, legal immigrants, and criminal aliens are in the country.
3 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: lakerman1 6/27/2019 12:33:19 PM (No. 108081)
Chief Judas Roberts no longer surprises me with his legal reasoning. His epilepsy medicine must play havoc with his brain.
6 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: DVC 6/27/2019 12:36:36 PM (No. 108087)
Dammit, this is frrustrating. And Roberts continues to be a traitor, probably still being pressured on his questionable adoptions.
8 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: jimincalif 6/27/2019 12:40:52 PM (No. 108096)
Look for MSM articles about how Roberts has "grown" in office. Gag.
8 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: WhamDBambam 6/27/2019 12:41:36 PM (No. 108098)
So, the Dred Pirate Roberts takes another swig of rum and cackles out his "decision."
3 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: EJKrausJr 6/27/2019 12:43:16 PM (No. 108100)
All is not hopeless. If illegals are counted in the census, algorithms can be used to determine where they are. Eliminate normal birthrate percentages and the legal naturalizations, ala - you have located the illegals. My bet is California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, New York, Chicago, Florida.
2 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: RedWhite&Blue2 6/27/2019 1:03:45 PM (No. 108115)
Are you an American citizen? Que? Are you here legally? Bueno? Did you sneak into America? Si! Get these home invaders outta here! Veterans for Trump 2020 KAG
7 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: BarryNo 6/27/2019 1:23:23 PM (No. 108135)
I'll be straight forward here to the SCOTUS justices. No matter what reason Trump and Team have for wanting the census, I as a U.S. citizen demand it to keep my vote from being annulled. My vote and representation as a U.S. citizen MUST BE PROTECTED, from politics that attack it. If a state gets extra representation due to counting non-citizens, in the House - that harms ME. If illegals and others forbidden from voting can more easily defraud me - that Harms ME. If the government, my servant, harms me, I will resort to my second amendment options, and remove my government from power.
5 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: iraengneer 6/27/2019 1:28:11 PM (No. 108139)
Roberts is worthless or worse. If he had been worth "a tinker's damn", Bush would not have made the nomination. The revenge of the Republicrats in action, once again.
4 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: chillijilli 6/27/2019 1:35:56 PM (No. 108144)
I never do the census. Nothing has ever happened to me; my wrist has never been slapped. Do you really think they have enough employees with enough authority to come storming into my house, knocking down doors when I can simply claim I can't read because I'm visually-challenged. And I can't hear what they're asking me because I'm hearing challenged. And I'm identifying as something different on a daily basis and today I think I'm am introvert trannie so please stop harassing me and respect my need to be left alone. I figure I've got my bases covered. Another idea I recently had was to just wear a burkha when they come knocking. And just shrug whenever they ask a question.
4 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: Daisymay 6/27/2019 1:37:12 PM (No. 108147)
The Supreme Court had this case before them for a LONG time. Does anyone think it was by accident this was the LAST Case of the Term to be decided? I don't think so! It was done so that there would not be time to print the Census forms with the question. I did read that asking that question would NOT be unconstitutional. So, since the Supremes couldn't bring it upon themselves to make a decision, I would PRINT the form, WITH the Question on it. What are they going to do about it? I would just print and mail. The sooner the better. Let them scream and march and argue about the poor ILLEGALS and how they would be afraid to fill it out. Ya think! THE'RE ILLEGAL! This is such a stupid game! Legal Americans have filled out this form all their lives. Our government needs to know how many CITIZENS are in the country. It doesn't matter if the ILLEGALS aren't counted. The Democrats only want them counted so they can have more Reps in Congress, but ILLEGALS don't need to be represented because they have no RIGHTS in this country. Simple as that. I say print the darn form WITH the question on it and let the chips fall where they may!!
3 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: bighambone 6/27/2019 1:39:27 PM (No. 108150)
Get ready for another congressional investigation commenced by the Democrats trying to use this Supreme Court decision to impeach both President Trump and Commerce Secretary Ross. This decision follows the Democrat propensity to attack the deliberative process used by the Trump Administration to make final decisions that are in the end correct. As the court said here, the decision to put the citizenship question on the Census is constitutional and legal, but that the process used by the administration to reach their decision must be further reviewed by the federal courts who can routinely now nitpick that internal administration process for years. In the end this is all about Congressional representation. Should Members of Congress represent the US citizens who voted for them, or should they represent a greater universe of constituents including the 22 million illegal aliens who are now unlawfully in the country. As we witnessed last evening during the Democrat debate when much time was taken up by leftist Democrat politicians arguing if mass uncontrolled illegal immigration should be decriminalized, and instead encouraged, at a time that about 100,000 intending poor, uneducated, and socialist minded illegal aliens, many of them unemployable in any job more skilled than manual labor, are successfully gaining unlawful entry to the USA each month through the insecure borderline?
1 person likes this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: EQKimball 6/27/2019 1:41:39 PM (No. 108153)
The best way to innoculate adminstrative decisions and executive orders from judicial interference is to create an administrative record that starts at the bottom, meaning studies, collected research and the solicitation of competing arguments that culminate in a recommendation to the head of the agency. Orders and actions that appear driven by political calculus and have suffered from over-exposure in the political arena are vulnerable to today's decision. Done quietly and with evident scholarship, courts will almost always defer to the administration. If the President hopes to have a better outcome the circuit court on this he must avoid further comment.
1 person likes this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: davew 6/27/2019 1:41:59 PM (No. 108155)
As EJKrauseJr correctly states the non-citizen questions provide enough information on previous residency, ethnicity and country of birth, and work history to reasonably determine citizenship status when correlated against other public records. The point of the citizenship question would be to create a perjury trap with legal consequences if the person lied or failed to answer this particular census question. If illegals are concerned about their discovery and deportation based on filling out the census form the lack of the citizenship question should not give them much comfort.
0 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: Wary American 6/27/2019 1:55:19 PM (No. 108164)
Yeah...they call it the Supreme Court...and like so much of the rhetoric out in the 'media' these days...IT IS A LIE. "Keep your powder dry fellow Americans.
2 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua 6/27/2019 3:12:40 PM (No. 108232)
With allies like Roberts, who needs enemies? The Trump administration apparently concealed its true reason for adding the query? Are the judges on the Supreme Court mind readers now? What is their evidence? They have none! If the census includes illegals, how many more Representatives will be added to Congress? Will they all be in left leaning states in left leaning cities? There are good reason to not include illegals in the census. They aren't citizens! Don't need to hide anything. Its easy to tell what the Democrats and the rest of the hardcore left are up to. They don't hide their intentions much. The real snakes are Republicans that seem OK most of the time until needed by the lefty Democrats, and then they turn on you. The census debate isn't over, and one can see where it is heading.
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Imright"
4 Times The Media Admitted
They Miss Trump
2 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 2:10:15 PM Post Reply
Since announcing his candidacy for President in 2015, Donald Trump has dominated the national news cycle — largely to the benefit of legacy media companies. As a growing amount of their airtime centered upon their hatred of the businessman turned politician, many witnessed sharp increases in their audience sizes. The New York Times, for instance, saw more subscriptions in the last three months of 2016 than all of 2015 combined. During election week in 2020, CNN saw a 135% increase in viewership over the first week of November 2019. After the inauguration of President Biden, however, legacy media saw double-digit drops in their viewership.
Sore Loser Hillary Clinton Trashes Trump
Supporters, ‘The Republican Party Turned
Themselves Into a Cult’ (Video)
15 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 10:27:27 AM Post Reply
‘Trump supporters are deplorable cult members’ – Hillary Clinton Twice-failed presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton trashed Trump supporters as cultists and said she just doesn’t understand Donald Trump’s popularity. Hillary Clinton also praised RINO Rep Liz Cheney for supporting the Democrats’ second impeachment of Donald Trump. “It is really troubling to see the Republican Party turn themselves into a cult and basically pledge allegiance, not to the United States of America, but to Donald Trump,”
The numbers are in, and the
states don't need a bailout
0 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 10:17:14 AM Post Reply
Democrats call their current massive spending bill a "COVID relief" bill, but the half-trillion-dollar bailout of state governments has nothing to do with COVID-19 relief. Plenty of states are doing poorly fiscally, but generally, this has nothing to do with the pandemic and everything to do with their own mismanagement.This was a disputed point back in the spring, but no more. The numbers are in. The coronavirus has not left most states struggling for revenue the way people originally expected.The Congressional Budget Office is anticipating 4.6% economic growth in 2021. That surge, which will come along with the lifting of coronavirus restrictions, will serve as its own stimulus package
NRCC Poll Reveals Which Lawmaker
Is The ‘Most Unpopular Elected
Official in the Country’
6 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 10:11:04 AM Post Reply
In what might not surprise anyone, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is the most unpopular elected official in the country. A new survey from the National Republican Congressional Committee found that Republicans are in a strong position to take back the House in 2022, in part because Pelosi is so unpopular in every “key” subgroup, including women, Hispanics, and union households.Breitbart noted: The survey identified the 80-year-old speaker as the “most unpopular elected official in the country,” scoring a 52 percent unfavorable rating and 41 percent favorable rating. The unfavorable rating includes 45 percent who view Pelosi as “very” unfavorable.
RNC says it ‘has every right’ to
use Trump’s name for fundraising
17 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 10:07:09 AM Post Reply
The Republican National Committee is insisting it has a right to use former President Donald Trump’s name and likeness for fundraising, following a cease and desist letter from the former commander in chief.Last Friday, Trump sent a letter to the RNC and other Republican organizations telling them to “immediately cease and desist the unauthorized use of President Donald J. Trump’s name, image, and/or likeness in all fundraising, persuasion, and/or issue speech.”RNC chief counsel Justin Riemer replied in a letter to Team Trump that the GOP “has every right to refer to public figures as it engages in core,
Hillary Clinton: Filibuster
‘Should Be Retired’
14 replies
Posted by Imright 3/9/2021 3:05:06 AM Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Monday on “Washington Post Live” that to forward President Joe Biden’s agenda, Democrats have to “do away with” the filibuster.Reporter Jonathan Capehart said, “Your view on the filibuster. In terms of getting President Biden’s agenda through, there is a lot of increasing talk that the filibuster needs to be done away so it can get through on a simple majority vote. If you were still in the Senate, would you vote to do away with the filibuster?”Clinton said, “I would, Johnathan. I would vote to do away with the filibuster. I think it has outlasted its usefulness.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Correcting the Biden Administration’s
Lies About the Border Crisis
3 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:18:08 PM Post Reply
What is happening right now on the border and within the United States regarding illegal immigration is being misrepresented by the Biden administration and much of the media. Most nightly television broadcasts do not even mention the chaos on the border, what is causing it and what the government is doing in response. When they do, they merely copy the administration’s talking points that are inaccurate and misleading.There is currently a surge at the border. Border Patrol is apprehending more than 4,000 people a day. There was one day last week that they arrested over 4,700 people. They are calculating that there is an additional 500-1,000 escaping apprehension daily.
Biden Putting Migrant Kids In ‘Facilities Akin
To Jails,’ Separating Them From Parents
‘For Weeks’: Reports
7 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:10:36 PM Post Reply
Democrat President Joe Biden is reportedly putting migrant children in detention facilities that resemble prisons and is separating the children for weeks on end—both issues that Democrats and the media used to attack former President Donald Trump during Trump’s presidency.“The number of unaccompanied migrant children detained along the southern border has tripled in the last two weeks to more than 3,250, filling facilities akin to jails as the Biden administration struggles to find room for them in shelters,” The New York Times reported.
Biden Designating Venezuela For Temporary
Protected Status — Estimated 300,000
Living In US Will Be Eligible
18 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 5:20:29 PM Post Reply
The Department of Homeland Security will designate more than 300,000 Venezuelans living in the U.S. illegally for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) on Monday evening, senior administration officials told reporters ahead of the announcement.The officials said the new designation marks a departure from the Trump administration’s “unilateral” approach to Venezuela and will last for 18 months, as is customary of TPS designations. The move marks one part of the Biden administration’s attempts to have U.S. allies increase pressure on Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro to engage in legitimate negotiations with Venezuela interim President Juan Guaido and the opposition party.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Trump-appointed attorney who refused to
resign in fiery letter is booted by Biden
7 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 2:30:55 PM Post Reply
The general counsel for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sharon Gustafson, has been summarily fired by the Biden administration after she refused to resign in an openly defiant letter to the president.The firing of the Trump-appointed attorney took place on Friday. The letter she sent to Biden was shared by Bloomberg Law, the first to report on the development. An email evidently shows that the Biden administration demanded on March 2nd that she step down immediately.Gustafson politely refused to resign, stating that her term runs through 2023. She was then informed that as of 5 p.m. on Friday, she was terminated.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article