Libs apoplectic after Louie Gohmert dares to
call alleged whistleblower by name at hearing
BizPac Review,
by
Samantha Chang
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
12/13/2019 12:03:54 PM
Democrats are feigning outrage after Republican Congressman Louie Gohmert called the alleged Ukraine “whistleblower” by name during a televised House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing last night.Gohmert dropped the alleged whistleblower’s name during his opening statement, when he said Eric Ciaramella and others should be questioned as fact witnesses. Gohmert said: “Abuse of power [and] obstruction of Congress — the very things the majority has done in preventing us from having the witnesses that could shed light on this. We needed to hear from those witnesses — people like Sean Misko, Abigail Grace, Eric Ciaramella, Devin Archer, Joe Biden, Nellie Ohr, Alexandra Chalupa — and so many others.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/13/2019 12:08:46 PM (No. 261032)
I love Louie Gohmert!!!!!!!
41 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
stablemoney 12/13/2019 12:09:00 PM (No. 261033)
Always a pleasure to see leftists apoplectic. Nothing more inspiring.
27 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jalo1951 12/13/2019 12:13:06 PM (No. 261039)
For once Republicans have stood up to the dems. Everybody knew his name anyway. Good grief. But Louie and Rep. John Kennedy are a hoot and a treasurer.
33 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
RayLRiv 12/13/2019 12:14:17 PM (No. 261041)
Louie don't play y'all
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 12/13/2019 12:14:57 PM (No. 261042)
How dare he blurt out the name of the whistleblower/rumorblower/gossipblower ERIC CIARAMELLA… ERIC CIARAMELLA should never work in this town again.
I am so glad that ERIC CIARAMELLA has finally been outed by courageous Louie Gohmert.
Did I mention that ERIC CIARAMELLA is the infamous, traitorous whistleblower????
34 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Avikingman 12/13/2019 12:15:02 PM (No. 261043)
The rush to pearl clutching and the fainting couch must have been a 'RAT stampede.
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
bad-hair 12/13/2019 12:28:54 PM (No. 261065)
Libs apoplectic over having to explain to their voter base (big word) what apoplectic means.
9 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bpl40 12/13/2019 12:33:17 PM (No. 261070)
Who are they kidding? Get a life!
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
chumley 12/13/2019 1:05:26 PM (No. 261123)
I bet the congressional safe space was full, and ran out of Kleenex quickly.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 12/13/2019 1:16:43 PM (No. 261143)
How can Dems be upset since all of th have claimed they have no clue who the whistleblowheart is?
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 12/13/2019 1:33:48 PM (No. 261162)
Apoplectic definition: over-emoting hypocrite clown gasbags full of Schiff....
Liars, thieves, self-centered, and spending OPM is NEVER going to get any of you clowns elected ever again!
Veterans for Trump 2020
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/13/2019 1:40:32 PM (No. 261165)
The pajama boy who can't even grow a beard must be petrified. He talked to Adam Schiff with the solemn promise that he would not be identified. Schiff handled that promise as carelessly as he started the impeachment circus. Now the entire country knows what a failed CIA Weenie is capable of - making a total fool of himself. These people proclaim themselves to be the best, now we see exactly what their best is. He might as well move to Oregon or Colorado and grow pot in his back yard. SEALs in Vietnam used to call CIA people "Christians in Action." I see that as an insult to Christians. They are more like Boy Scouts trained by accountants.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
IdahoJoe 12/13/2019 3:09:49 PM (No. 261240)
Ciarmamella is the plaintiff in the trial of the President. Democrats don't get to swap plaintiffs and charges in the middle of the trial. Not how it works. And the plaintiff has to be identified, show up, and have his charges freely open to cross examination. Schiff and Nadler may be pounding the gavel to silence anyone that presents contrary evidence, but their being able to do something does not make it right. Theirs is the true abuse of power.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 12/13/2019 3:51:50 PM (No. 261282)
If the House Dems vote to send it to trial in the Senate, you can be damned sure that Ciaramella will be called to testify. So will Schiff, and both Bidens. What will the vote be? Will the Dems in the swing states risk their re-election by voting YES? Either way, yes or no, it will ultimately benefit Trump. Will the Dems risk being called to testify under oath in the Senate? That's the real question in my mind.
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 12/13/2019 4:27:25 PM (No. 261325)
Whistleblowers have NO SUCH anonymity outside of the IG.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Muguy 12/13/2019 4:41:53 PM (No. 261343)
Why can't we talk about it????
BECAUSE of where it LEADS-- to CORRUPTION so INCRIMINATING the demonrat socialist party would be completely and utterly RUINED to its core and obliterated.
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bad-hair 12/13/2019 5:08:35 PM (No. 261367)
# 12 on down. TY for the definition with clarity. In the USA anonymous accusers are limited to the internet where they can flame away. In a court of law they had better show their faces. 1, 2, … however many they have.
1 person likes this.
Everyone has the right to meet their accuser.
Am I the only one questioning the IQ of House members ? One man has caused mass hysteria. A patriotic man. What does that tell you ? They should all be like Gohmert, Kennedy and Gaetz.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)