Mark Meadows:Impeachment hearing
produced this 'real bombshell'
Fox News,
by
Vandana Rambaran
Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly,
11/21/2019 4:21:03 AM
GOP Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, hammered America's ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, during Wednesday's testimony, seizing on Sondland's admission that he never heard the president or anyone else in the White House explicitly link Ukrainian aid with the opening of an investigation into 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., applauded his colleague on producing "the real bombshell" of Sondland's long-anticipated testimony and marked the moment as "game over," for the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry. That inquiry is focusing on an alleged quid pro quo between President Trump and Ukraine linking military aid and White House access to Ukraine probes beneficial to Trump.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Staunch Repub 11/21/2019 6:39:48 AM (No. 241030)
Two things:
1. Given we've learned Sondland was blackmailed to testify (protesters at his hotel chain who threatened to become 'more aggressive') every future witness should be asked repeatedly whether they were in any way threatened, coerced, etc.
2. And our side, when asking other redundant questioning of witnesses, should repeat saying '
'... I need to repeat this question so the dunderhead Chair and his lapdog media might have it soak in..
68 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Rinktum 11/21/2019 7:07:42 AM (No. 241048)
So thankful to the fine men and women who are taking it to these nitwits who believe that their personal presumption is evidence worthy of impeachment. Despite the fact that the media is doing everything in its power to give gravitas to these witnesses, they are all proving to be partisan hacks. The American people are not amused or fooled by this badly acted farce. Keep praying that the good guys will prevail and that the Deep State will be devastated by light of truth that is being shined on them.
64 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
mobyclik 11/21/2019 7:25:01 AM (No. 241062)
Biggest problem is, most people still get their news from the lying, so-called mainstream media. If it's said/written in any of those venues, it's gospel. Even Fox is becoming anti-Trump. Hard for the Republicans to get the truth out there.
71 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
gone2pot 11/21/2019 8:21:04 AM (No. 241095)
Not even a scintilla of the total evisceration of Sondland is being reported so most of the country has absolutely no idea it happened let alone the facts revealed; zero, none. In addition, very few voters know that every. single. request. for witnesses has been disallowed by Schiff because the Marxist media is simply not reporting it. And, of course, not one world about Sondland's wife's hotels being threatened by rioters and not one word that the Marxist congressman responsible for those riots tweeted "Welcome to the resistance" to Sondland literally seconds after Schiff's noon-time impeachment announcement as well as ending the riots against his wife's hotels. Not a peep. Orange Man Bad is the ONLY thing the Marxist media is reporting and of course lying about. So, regardless of the truth, most voters are utterly and happily clueless. Orange Man Bad is all they know...and all they believe.
33 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 11/21/2019 8:26:58 AM (No. 241101)
So far the performance of the Republicans on the Committee has been stellar. If ANY Democrat in a toss-up district are watching they'd better be thinking twice about moving like Lemmings off the political cliff following the Democrats from "safe" districts, like SanFranNan and Schiff-for-brains. IF Impeachment comes for a vote in the House then I doubt it would pass, which is why the House Whip may put a stop to it to avoid further Dem campaign embarrassment.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
OBX Pete 11/21/2019 8:35:49 AM (No. 241109)
How does it come to this in America? This guy lying Schiff turns out to be the most powerful man in the country. This is not what the framers of the Constitution intended. There HAS to be a way (short of the most extreme way) to put a stop this insanity.
35 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
moebellini3 11/21/2019 8:42:47 AM (No. 241121)
Fact is, democrats get away with this pitiful exhibition because of the illiterates in the democratic party. Through indoctrination and brain washing, to a democrat, right is left, black is white, yes is no, light is dark, truth is fiction and right is wrong. Their sick world is upside down they think and see everything as the opposite of what it really is. Words are convicting Trump, NOT FACTS or EVIDENCE. How this charade is allowed to continue is a travesty. But don't tell that to a democrat because they live in a delusional world. This is what democrats have done to our great country. These are things you see in North Korea and Cuba. But democrats have brought that freak show to our country. Get it yet....
19 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
starboard 11/21/2019 9:05:09 AM (No. 241148)
Kudos to all the Republicans on the committee. I'm especially fond of Elise Stefanik. She's not only smart, but also has unflinching courage to take on the media and does it with confidence. I see a big future ahead for her.
36 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
IdahoJoe 11/21/2019 9:09:44 AM (No. 241154)
The Democrats (Hillary) manufactured evidence and used it to spy on Trump, then Democrats tried him based on that manufactured evidence. Hillary was guilty of bribery and destroying evidence, PDT was innocent. Hillary got a free pass, Trump got a sham trial. When the President was found innocent, Democrats again manufactured evidence, saying that they *feel* the President wanted something that he repeatedly said he did not want. They treat gossip as being more important than facts. Ukraine reported yesterday that Biden and the other Democrats really are guilty of receiving stolen US government funds and then covering it up via Joe Biden's bribery and extortion. The Democrats want to fish around in the President's tax returns in the hope that they can find something that conflicts with the thousands of tax laws that contradict each other, and barring that, at least involve him in some manufactured 'Lying to the FBI' charge. The Democrats in the House want the testimony collected by Muller so that they can have a no-rules Do-Over. How many times can the Democrats falsely try the President? What does it take to frog march a bunch of corrupt coup conspirators to prison?
23 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
jacksin5 11/21/2019 9:17:53 AM (No. 241160)
What will be reported in the MSM is whatever Shifty Shiff says happened. He makes sure to hold a press conference early in the day to guarantee the Press gets it's talking points before anything of substance even occurs in the hearings.
13 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 11/21/2019 9:24:21 AM (No. 241165)
Keep your chins up. This charade is happening for two reasons and two reasons only - to keep Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and Strzok out of jail and to prevent the President from nominating a Supreme Court justice after Ruthie keels over. And to keep Obie and Billary from being disgraced forever, once the prison terms are assigned. We now have the deep state, msm, and the globalists out in the open and can easily see how this network of corruption operates.
28 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Strike3 11/21/2019 9:29:07 AM (No. 241170)
Hopefully all of the bloodthirsty dems who are sitting at home and watching this Salem-style trial on TV every day have the mental capacity to understand that the dems have no clothes on.
Maybe Schiff will be desperate enough now to march Ciaramella out and really mess it up for himself. People will see living proof that the CIA is crooked and still working for Obama.
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
curious1 11/21/2019 9:31:36 AM (No. 241171)
The biggest problem is a 'quid pro quo' arrangement (and you do this every time you go to the grocery store or get gas, for example) isn't against any law for the President (any president) of the United States to insist upon before we give another nation taxpayer dollars (not that we should be handing out taxpayer dollars, that's another discussion). So what, exactly, are the commies trying to do, you should ask yourself. And anybody you run into that thinks it is, ask them what statute prohibits the President from insisting on suitable assurances against corruption before we hand over money stolen from whomever you are talking to about that.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
bighambone 11/21/2019 9:34:43 AM (No. 241176)
The Democrats and especially Schiff are so far down in the “Deep State” bureaucratic personality weeds that they are drowning. They are trying to hold President Trump to such a high standard that he would have little of no discretion to conduct, in this instance, foreign affairs, and in the future who knows, as he sees fit in accordance with his constitutional duties.
If this sham impeachment inquisition becomes the precedent for the future, from now on anytime there is a President of one political party with the House of Representatives by the opposite political party it will be impossible for future Presidents to exercise any discretion in accordance with their constitutional duties, if that discretion discombobulates some career bureaucrats without risking being placed under impeachment proceedings initiated by the opposite political party to remove him or her from office.
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 11/21/2019 10:19:34 AM (No. 241211)
The only question now is how many Dems will lose their House seat because of impeachment? ANd I bet more than 2 Dems vote against impeachment now that their jobs are about over.
7 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
gobushcheneygo 11/21/2019 10:27:33 AM (No. 241220)
The real bombshell for me (and I saw the video on Tucker Carlson's show) was Lt. Col. Vindman admitting that Ukraine asked him at least 3 times to be Ukraine's Defense Secretary. Huh? Has anybody seen that revelation on the lamestream news? A US military officer was asked multiple times to be the Defense Secretary for Ukraine? Where is his loyalty to the US? Why him? Hmmmm.
12 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
NotaBene 11/21/2019 11:29:47 AM (No. 241277)
‘’Mr. Nunez call mLieutenant Colonel Vindman” is a nationalized citizen from the Ukraine. He probably loves the Ukraine more than the USA. Surprisingly, the Ambassadors that the Democrats unearthed also prefer the Ukrainian interest to ours although they are from here. The Department of State has unmasked itself. Together with the FBI, CIA, NSA, FISA Court they conspired against US. Unbelievable treachery.
8 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
HicoKid 11/21/2019 11:55:04 AM (No. 241314)
President Trump should have canned all of these disloyal, deep-state bureaucrats at the beginning of his presidency. I sure hope he has the foresight to do at the beginning of his next term.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
bighambone 11/21/2019 12:01:44 PM (No. 241323)
When is Schiff for brains going to investigate the leftist protestors who sought to intimidate their witness Gordon Sondland by conducting wild protests against his businesses?
3 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/21/2019 12:41:42 PM (No. 241361)
1. Great job, Republicans! Way to eviscerate their fake accusers!
2. December 11.....it will be the start of big payback to all the lefty liars!
3. The IG report.
4. The Barr report.
5. The Durham report.
It’s OUR TURN!
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
udanja99 11/21/2019 1:32:33 PM (No. 241391)
I admit to not watching one nanosecond of this farce but have been reading a lot about it and listening to numerous talk radio programs about it. The question I have, which I wish that Rep. Jordan would ask Schiffhead is this...
If Joe Biden is immune from investigation by this administration because he is a political opponent running for president, then shouldn’t PDT be immune from investigation by Schiffhead and cohorts because he is a political opponent running for president?
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
RW 11/21/2019 4:50:05 PM (No. 241511)
I for one think the Democrat's whole premise of impeachment exposes it as a witch hunt. In other words, even if Trump had Joe Biden as a potential election opponent in mind when he and/or his associates allegedly tried to get Ukraine to investigate Biden’s son, so what? Hunter Biden’s presence and outsized salary on the Burisma board is clearly very suspicious. Several of the Democrat’s witnesses admitted it had the appearance of impropriety. And moreover, the Obama Administration itself was concerned about this relationship. Therefore, what does Trump’s motive matter? Objectively, it was a valid thing to do and certainly consistent with his campaign promises to eliminate corruption perpetrated by the Swamp.
But there is one thing that Sondland said that concerns me. Sondland claimed that it was primarily Rudy Giuliani who led him to believe there was a political motivation for investigating Hunter Biden. My question is why was Giuliani mixed up in this in the first place? He is not a government official, much less one within the State Department. He is Trump’s personal lawyer. Is this fishy? Is it common for presidents to get their attorneys/friends/family members to circumvent the normal protocols to handle such matters? Maybe it is but if so, I think it would be helpful to identify precedents.
0 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 11/21/2019 5:27:09 PM (No. 241541)
This isn't the first time people have lied about Rudy. He is used to it. You can either be loved or understood; not both.
0 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
4Justice 11/21/2019 7:44:20 PM (No. 241637)
The Democrats seemed to have revived and reimplemented the CIA's Operation Mockingbird, infiltrated the schools and dunbed down as well as indoctrinated generations with leftist ideology, and combined their efforts with various manipulative tactics (like perception management and controlling most of the media and entertainment), and created an Orwellian nightmare that we need to find a way to expose and destroy. Why can't WE pool resources and have our own media outlets and our own entertainment industry?? Why can't we start our own schools and stop the brainwashing?
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)