Federal Judge Accuses New York Times,
Washington Post of ‘Shocking’ Bias Against
Republicans
Breitbart Media,
by
Nate Church
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
3/21/2021 1:21:14 AM
Judge Laurence Silberman accused the New York Times and Washington Post of being “Democratic Party broadsheets” in a dissenting opinion on Friday. Washington, DC, federal appellate judge Laurence Silberman accused the New York Times and Washington Post, and to some extent the Wall Street Journal, of being mouthpieces for “rather shocking” bias against the Republican Party in a written opinion on Friday.“The orientation of these three papers is followed by The Associated Press and most large papers across the country (such as the Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, and Boston Globe),” he said in the opinion. “Nearly all television—
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Strike3 3/21/2021 3:20:44 AM (No. 730279)
Wow, it's like he was right there reading that propaganda for the past five years. Now if he can only identify how the democrats pay to have their version of the truth published.
25 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
OBX Pete 3/21/2021 4:36:30 AM (No. 730289)
OMG !!!!!!!!! Am I dreaming? They finally came up with an honest Federal Judge. Now watch the crazies come up with their venom. I hope this Judge is as strong as his opinion !!!!
64 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rfr46 3/21/2021 5:10:30 AM (No. 730293)
Watch for the frenzied propagandists try to destroy Judge Silberman.
43 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
judy 3/21/2021 5:22:15 AM (No. 730297)
Read one newspaper in the morning then read 10 ...they all have the exact messages...against republicans.. pro dems...why would anyone buy a newspaper....I quit years ago....when W Bush was in office. During Trump's campaign he brought all these fake papers to our attention.
36 people like this.
Talk. Talk. Talk. It will change nothing. The judge will be imprisoned for speaking out.
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
mobyclik 3/21/2021 7:18:02 AM (No. 730324)
Watch any TV news, Judge? Same lying garbage, different medium.
30 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
FleetUSA 3/21/2021 7:27:12 AM (No. 730329)
A dissent doesn't often go far. Keep praying of us.
18 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kafka2 3/21/2021 7:50:31 AM (No. 730348)
A voice crying in the MSM wilderness.
26 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
TruthFetish 3/21/2021 7:56:42 AM (No. 730349)
I simply remain baffled by what props up these two rags. It's not the traditional advertising model.
17 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
udanja99 3/21/2021 8:01:54 AM (No. 730357)
Did you bother to read down to the third paragraph, #6?
10 people like this.
We need more judges like this. Where are all the judges Trump appointed?
On a side note, a few days ago the judge in the Ghislaine Maxwell approved redactions of court transcripts because they are too "sensational and impure" to be revealed to public.
So it's too much for the us to handle? I think I can handle it. What I can't deal with is all this continued coverup and censoring. We need to know what went on at that island and what is on those laptops! The FBI, who works for us, knows and now so does the courts.
The truth about the evil cabal and their Luciferian child sex trafficking need to be revealed. People need to know the extent of evil that is still present in the world, and how our enemies operate. I'm sure there were those who had trouble accepting the Holocaust. It's just a lame excuse to keep us ignorant of the truth.
20 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 3/21/2021 8:44:54 AM (No. 730391)
#11 points us to the drivers behind the ongoing msm bias. And it gets even worse at paragraph 6.
FTA - "It should be borne in mind that the first step taken by any potential authoritarian or dictatorial regime is to gain control of communications, particularly the delivery of news,” Silberman added, saying “it is fair to conclude, therefore, that one-party control of the press and media is a threat to a viable democracy. It may even give rise to countervailing extremism.”
Far too many Americans don't even have a clue what is happening to them or the country nor do they care.
21 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
bpl40 3/21/2021 8:46:37 AM (No. 730395)
So? it will go to the SCOTUS. Where John Roberts will deem it a tax.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack 3/21/2021 9:24:23 AM (No. 730427)
No s*it Shylock
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 3/21/2021 9:25:39 AM (No. 730428)
Welcome back to the planet, your honor.
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
BarryNo 3/21/2021 9:52:16 AM (No. 730453)
Political News should be run by the political parties. Each party should pay for and maintain News outlets readily available to the public and given equal time at identical hours across the News spectrum. It should be completely illegal to censure these outlets, or anyone privately referencing them.
The private programs, such as Rush's, would also be protected under this umbrella, but would be limited only by the popularity of the programs. Likewise, Holly wood would not be censured, unless they libeled private citizens. Get the information out there and let the People decide.
Google Twitter and Facebook entities are suppose to serve the public. On political matters, they would have to obey the non-censorship rule. They can comment, "This opinion is not supported by our Company" but that's it!!
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Right Time 3/21/2021 10:18:36 AM (No. 730478)
The NYT bias against Republicans is "BIASED"?
Who knew?
Has Judge Silberman been asleep for 40 years?
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
PChristopher 3/21/2021 10:44:17 AM (No. 730507)
Should've put THIS guy on the SCOTUS!!
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
TennDon 3/21/2021 10:53:21 AM (No. 730516)
#9. I simply remain baffled by what props up these two rags. It's not the traditional advertising model.
In the case of the Wash Composted it’s our orders for stuff to Amazon and bebbos.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 3/21/2021 11:47:44 AM (No. 730568)
Here, here! Now what?
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
DVC 3/21/2021 11:51:13 AM (No. 730575)
Judge Silberman is exactly right. But this has been well known for 40 years and more.
5 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)