Report: Leader of Online Group Where Pentagon
Leaks Appeared Is 21-Year-Old Air National Guardsman
Breitbart National Security,
by
Kristina Wong
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
4/13/2023 7:09:20 PM
The New York Times on Thursday revealed the name of the leader of an online gaming group where classified Pentagon leaks first reportedly appeared as Jack Teixeira, a 21-year-old Air National Guardsman.
The paper — which was the first to report the existence of the leaks — identified him as a member of the intelligence wing of the Massachusetts Air National Guard, who oversaw a private online group named “Thug Shaker Central.”Two U.S. officials told the Times that they want to talk to him about the leak, although neither the paper nor officials called him a “suspect.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
LeeBertie 4/13/2023 7:53:40 PM (No. 1447444)
I call BS.
No, I SHOUT OUT BS from the roof tops!
A 21 year old low grade enlisted National Guardsman, E3 max, did this? No way. What sort of access could this kid have had? He's not remotely close to being a believable scapegoat.
52 people like this.
My hunch is that he was given these files by someone much senior with a high security clearance. Could be military, government or contractor Guardsmen don’t have this kind of access.
29 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 4/13/2023 9:06:08 PM (No. 1447475)
Pardon me for saying so, but 21 year-olds are mostly still wet behind the ears. Who are the people who want to give 16 year-olds the right to vote? In every age group just champing at the bit to get a driver's license, or a mortgage or a motorcycle, there are some, maybe even many, who could handle adulthood carefully. They have on some sort of cloaking device, though.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
buckeye1 4/13/2023 9:06:43 PM (No. 1447476)
Can you say, ''Fall Guy''?
44 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DustDevil31 4/13/2023 10:19:06 PM (No. 1447508)
The briefs were not intended for his eyes but I bet he or somebody snatched these briefs from a burn bag after the briefings were wrapped up. Poor housekeeping
7 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/13/2023 10:43:04 PM (No. 1447514)
Amazing that our Supreme Court still has no clue who "leaked" the Roe v. Wade overturn ruling a year ago.
46 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Tennman 4/13/2023 11:21:05 PM (No. 1447528)
This does not come anywhere close to passing the smell-test. They want us to believe a 3-striper in the freeking national guard has access to top-secret documents? Maybe he was gaming in Brandon's garage?
28 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
judy 4/13/2023 11:25:51 PM (No. 1447530)
That was fast. Where’s the Epstein list & the Supreme Court leaker!
38 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DiegoDude 4/14/2023 5:11:53 AM (No. 1447603)
A 21 year old, slick sleeve, jeep airman had this kind of access? If this is true (I'm smelling b.s. here), then our military is in worse shape than I thought. I had a TS/SCI clearance when I was in and there were things I didn't have access to based on a "right and need to know." Portions of information you were "read in" on, but not everything. I'm thinking this kid may be taking the fall for some higher ups who screwed the pooch on this.
35 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
petrichor 4/14/2023 6:27:58 AM (No. 1447634)
I am not surprised that this kid had access. He had a top level clearance. The same one I had at 18. The more important point is the "need to know". This kid didn't need access to that info so why was it given? Still, the fact he released it just shows that he doesn't yet have the ability to think. I say up the voting age to 25.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
JackBurton 4/14/2023 6:41:58 AM (No. 1447638)
I'll bet he used the right pronouns.
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Clinger 4/14/2023 7:58:57 AM (No. 1447693)
And this has been going on since 2020 and if I'm not mistaken it's now 2023. Help me out here but 2023 - 2020 = roughly 3. And 21 - 3 = 18. I don't buy a 21 year old guardsman let alone an 18 year old.
9 people like this.
We are being doxxed again. Why? So the Cabal and the Jihad Junta can get rid of the pesky Bill of Rights once and for all. Since they have bastardized the vote there is no more accountability to the Electorate. They can do what they darn well please. That's the sick part, the GOPeahens let this happen.
7 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 4/14/2023 8:50:08 AM (No. 1447733)
Amazing that an Airman 1st Class (PFC) can get a TS-SCI clearance and access to JofS documents. Biden the cheater's DOD has brought incompetency to a new low. Or we are being scammed on this one.
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/14/2023 10:05:42 AM (No. 1447783)
Was this a true leak of highly classified information or was it a managed release of misinformation? In that respect we will probably never know. As far as the perpetrator is concerned, it is hard to believe that with his very limited experience in the Air Force that he was essentially granted apparent unlimited access to the highest level classified information. That alone shows that the hierarchy at the Pentagon does not have a clue as to who they are many times enlisting in the armed forces or their social proclivities. Clearly a lot of young people who used to be depended on to enlist in the armed forces are no longer doing that, making it more likely that the military is enlisting and is incompetently thinking they are training people who in reality are influenced by video games and the sort containing sly psychology, some that are put on the internet by foreign people and countries that do not have any interest in maintaining the national security of the USA.
Due to the current split politics in the country today you have to figure that a very large percentage of the young people who come from the conservative traditional warrior classes who would normally enlist in the armed forces, but because of Biden’s and his Obama originating crew’s efforts to install a “woke” political agenda throughout the armed forces, that is contrary to their cultural and religious upbringing, are no longer enlisting. Another large percentage of young people are so out of physical condition, or because of past illicit drug use, are currently deemed unqualified to enlist. If the recruitment figures continue to decline look for Biden and his crew to change the physical requirements for armed forces enlistment downward at least outside the ground combat related military occupational specialities. Who knows for sure, but what I wrote down is based upon my military experience including having been an infantryman at the age of 17 along the DMZ in South Korea and the entire year of 1968 in South Vietnam, the year that well over 15,000 US military members were killed in action with huge numbers beyond that being wounded. When I look back at the age of 80 today, my question is why did the US Government allow that to occur? I say that today, as when I recently purchased a jacket from LL Bean the tag in the jacket said made in Vietnam that still has a Communist Government based in North Vietnam.
7 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Kate318 4/14/2023 10:28:19 AM (No. 1447800)
Do not buy the narrative the government-media complex are pushing. This is not an accident, nor is it incompetence. The regime had to do 2 things: tamp down expectations about Ukraine, and help push the RESTRICT ACT.
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Zigrid 4/14/2023 10:30:22 AM (No. 1447804)
Something isn't right about this....WE need to determine who would gain from this disclosure...and why was the New York slims at his residence before the FBI....and why were the supposedly FBI agents wearing military uniforms...sounds like a new world order project to demoralize our country....doesn't pass the smell test...
6 people like this.
Gee, I hope nothing happens to this kid while he is in custody...Like Jeffrey Epstein.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 4/14/2023 4:47:12 PM (No. 1448024)
Notice this whole thing came out a couple of weeks after people started to find out what was in Senate Bill 686 (A.K.A. Satan's Bill 666) and got furious about it. So, now the government is going to just go ahead and do what the "Restrict Act' was going to do privacy and our rights, without having to bother with pretending to do it 'legally'.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)