Here Are 12 Reasons Why NPR And PBS Deserved
To Be Defunded
The Federalist,
by
Bryanna Lyman
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
5/3/2025 5:56:06 PM
On Thursday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order defunding NPR and PBS — two taxpayer-subsidized “news” organizations that have consistently published propaganda.
The order proclaims that “Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.”
“At the very least, Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
dwa 5/3/2025 6:08:02 PM (No. 1944849)
Let's remember this is the Left's emotional argument -- they are not going out of business as the word "defunding" would make one believe. If they are "defunded" by the Trump Administration, that means they lose less than 15 percent of their income since that is what the government provides them. The rest they get elsewhere. So, they would still operate but just without our tax dollars going to support their Leftist agenda.
55 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 5/3/2025 6:29:29 PM (No. 1944853)
The main thing to get rid of is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which is, as everyone is told on PBS and NPR shows, who funds the programs:
"The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private corporation funded by the American People."
A PRIVATE CORPORATION FUNDED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Leftists would lose their minds if there was a conservative private corporation that was funded with tax dollars.
Cut the head off the serpent.
61 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Encore 5/3/2025 6:34:06 PM (No. 1944854)
How about their total meltdown, on air, the night Trump won his first term. Unbiased? I’d say not.
37 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Strike3 5/3/2025 7:01:12 PM (No. 1944860)
This is a long overdue move on a communist organization. The only program that ever contained a grain of truth was Car Talk. They have always claimed that government funding was just a tiny part of their support and we will soon find out the falsehood of that claim. Bunch of snooty, anti-American trash.
44 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Birddog 5/3/2025 7:10:18 PM (No. 1944864)
The funding they "Report" as coming from the USA Govt, and insist is just a "Tiny Percentage" overall..is the equivalent of being just an "Advertiser" on any of the other networks....Do any of those "Other Networks" run 90% negative stories all day/every day bashing that "Advertiser"? If they did , how long does anyone think that "Advertiser" would keep writing check>
27 people like this.
Why are we, the American taxpayer made to pay for this and other expenses that are not Constitutional? Why must colleges receive federal funds? Illegal aliens receiving American tax dollars? Stop the money spigot. We are almost $37T in debt.
46 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
halfnorsk 5/3/2025 8:31:49 PM (No. 1944892)
The issue is not the litany of journalistic sins. The issue is the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment. If the government funds it, the government controls it--which is the antithesis of freedom of the press.
23 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MickTurn 5/3/2025 9:01:09 PM (No. 1944899)
Both of them are Leftist SchiffT Holes!
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
OhioNick 5/3/2025 11:59:44 PM (No. 1944908)
The writer of the article missed another reason why PBS deserves to be defunded. Anyone remember the biased, despicable documentary about Rush Limbaugh?
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
NotaBene 5/4/2025 1:34:07 AM (No. 1944913)
Ding Dong, the wicked PBS is dead.
The entire mainstream media was gelded when USAID was closed. While we still have trouble with Federal Judges defending Illegal Alien terrorists President Donald Trump has defeated completely the LGBTDEI and Green New Deal ideology. Not a shabby record of achievement for 100 days. Promises made promises kept.
18 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Petronius 5/4/2025 6:25:25 AM (No. 1944926)
NPR/PBS biased reporting on Hamas' attack on Israel and their defense of the terrorists alone should be reason enough to stop their funding.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BirdsNest 5/4/2025 6:25:36 AM (No. 1944927)
There are more than 12 reasons.
14 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
homefry 5/4/2025 7:33:05 AM (No. 1944946)
npr and pbs are just pieces in the dim-0 P.R. branch.
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Trapper 5/4/2025 8:33:56 AM (No. 1944970)
It's as if I woke up on Christmas morning and got so many presents that I couldn't open them all, so every day I open a new one and every day I get another present that was on my wish list. Ain't 2025 grand!
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 5/4/2025 9:25:49 AM (No. 1944995)
Before I would miss Keeping Up Appearances, I would just purchase the DVD set. Who doesn't love it when Hyacinth lies like a wet rug and everyone sees right through it! Including the vicar's wife. And Poor Richard doesn't even own an almanac. But he makes enough money to keep their never-seen son in lavender loafers.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet 5/4/2025 9:31:01 AM (No. 1945000)
If the political agenda was switched 180 degrees the dimocrats would be screaming their collective heads off. Do it, stop spending my money on any so called news organization that We the People should not be supporting. I thought that Freedom of the press was something that is free under the Constitution and not something that We have to pay for.
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
janjan 5/4/2025 9:31:47 AM (No. 1945001)
We don’t need 12 reasons to cut funding for public broadcasting networks. There is one. In this era of multiple choices of network, cable, streaming, and podcast services that are existing or even thriving through advertising there is no rational reason for our tax dollars to fund any of them. Viewership of CNN, MSNBC and public broadcasting is already thinly divided among the liberals who want to consume this garbage. Let capitalism pick the winners and losers.
8 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Zigrid 5/4/2025 9:49:06 AM (No. 1945011)
Never watched the NPR group...they were vicious and anti-conservative from the start...so this isn't much of a loss...let them go and find funding elsewhere....maybe Whoopi from the view has some ideas for them....the view knows how to spew hatred and commie ideas to the masses....the losers that watch the view are probably watching NPR already...but PBS is another story....I don't think they can find different funding...they've been on the government m_____gland for years....
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
JackBurton 5/4/2025 10:18:18 AM (No. 1945026)
Liberals are so high dungeon about the 'Establishment of (a) Religion'...
...but not about an establishment of a media. Today, is there a difference?
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
LissaMD 5/4/2025 10:53:37 AM (No. 1945045)
One of my favorite shows is "Antiques Roadshow". I have said, for well over a decade, if PBS no longer receives funding, which I wholeheartedly support, some cable network will pick them up and make the show better. And, as of the last couple of years, less preachy. What was once "just the facts", is now accompanied by a lecture about slavery or native Indians.
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
paral04 5/4/2025 11:16:54 AM (No. 1945055)
Not only are these two agencies mouth pieces for the left they now charge to watch their TV broadcasts. I stopped tuning in when they did that. They are useless if you want to hear the truth.
4 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
czechlist 5/4/2025 2:13:28 PM (No. 1945147)
cpb is a socialist dream. it is paid for by everyone regardless if they want it or not.
3 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Gallo3 5/4/2025 3:44:06 PM (No. 1945176)
The portion of NPR/PBS funding from the US General Fund is less than what we think. The portion provided by Leftist Foundations and Marxist NGO's is huge and capable of funding them by themselves. Plus, CPB and PBS and NPR have absolutely gigantic cash reserves in legacy funds. The only way to shove the stake into Pravda collectively is to Revoke Their Broadcast Licenses for failing to provide what they claimed in their applications-
Revoke. Revoke. Revoke.
4 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Alice 5/4/2025 4:12:59 PM (No. 1945193)
Here's another trip down memory lane, though a nit compared to the list in the article:
In 1998 when Hugo Chavez "won" his first election in Venezuela, Margaret Warner was on the ground as they like to put it, and she was ecstatic at Venezuela's move to become a socialist nation. I am not exaggerating by using the word ecstatic either. She was almost delirious with glee.
That being said, it was egregious that an American reporter would celebrate socialism at all, much less with such intensity. That was it for me. Thank God I had never gotten around to giving them a penny.
3 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
snakeoil 5/4/2025 6:28:09 PM (No. 1945248)
Used to listen to Car Talk, My Word, etc. But with All Things Considered I finally figured out it was only Left Wing things that were considered. Am grateful to NPR for Dr. Who, the Met Opera, and providing a time signal for my clocks before the internet. All my expensive FM tuners are in storage. With internet radio I have plenty of choices.
1 person likes this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 5/4/2025 8:00:01 PM (No. 1945301)
The original argument for PBS was to provide educational programming for poor people or places with limited TV signal reception. Somehow, I don't think the "urban" audience is tuning in for "Downton Abbey" and "Antiques Roadshow". That's middle class white people stuff that shouldn't be subsidized.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
I stopped NPR when Nina Tottenberg was so obviously biased. Decades ago.