Federal Judge Temporarily Limits DOGE’s
Access to Social Security Data over Privacy
Concerns 5
Breitbart Politics,
by
Amy Furr
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
4/18/2025 5:07:59 PM
The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been placed under updated restrictions, per a recent decision by U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Baltimore.
DOGE’s access is now limited when it comes to Social Security systems that contain personal data on citizens across the nation, the Associated Press (AP) reported on Thursday, noting that Hollander issued a preliminary injunction in the case after issuing a temporary restraining order.The case was brought by several labor unions and retired individuals who claim DOGE has violated privacy laws and its work has resulted in a risk to security.
In her ruling, Hollander said the objective to uncover government waste and fraud
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Some 20 year old bureaucrat has access, but not the DOGE team?!
24 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LadyVet 4/18/2025 5:38:25 PM (No. 1935317)
They do not want a ppssibility of cross-checking SS# to voter rolls.
27 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/18/2025 5:52:30 PM (No. 1935322)
I am more comfortable with DOGE access than ss employees, contractors, IT personnel, FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, and the Democrats.
26 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
anniebc 4/18/2025 8:13:33 PM (No. 1935409)
It's funny how corrupt judges hand out rulings that they expect others to obey, when all they while these judges are themselves abusing and breaking the law. What a world?
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 4/18/2025 8:51:22 PM (No. 1935425)
One need not read the article or go further than the Headline. This is a Clinton, Obambi or Diaper Joe judge. Don't need a name or area or anything else. The pattern is so plain even the dumbest, like Barbara Boxer or AOC or Adam Schiff can guess who appointed the judge. But can one guess who has absolutely no clue? Ah, correct! John Roberts.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MickTurn 4/18/2025 9:42:55 PM (No. 1935445)
All Trump needs to do is tell this Judge to POUND BROKEN GLASS!
All DOGE activity is ordered by POTUS, the Judge has NO authority here!
IF the Judge persists, arrest him and file at least 50 charges. If we can't get rid of her, we can bankrupt her!
22 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl 4/19/2025 2:02:25 AM (No. 1935493)
Wash, rinse, repeat.
9 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
skacmar 4/19/2025 7:34:27 AM (No. 1935559)
Even if names and personal information is exposed to DOGE, the same level as SS employees have, no privacy violations occur as long as that private information is not publicly released or shared with others. If caught committing fraud or abuse, them your name gets released to the proper SS authority who would address the issue. Stop the scare mongering.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Venturer 4/19/2025 8:08:07 AM (No. 1935576)
Somehow I am not concerned over the privacy of illegals who are cheating the social security System,
Nor am i concerned over the privacy of the democrats who allowed and encouraged them to use it.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franq 4/19/2025 8:14:20 AM (No. 1935584)
Can we endure 4 years of this nonsense?
I believe there is an upcoming Supreme Joke ruling on the matter.
Hopefully it goes the right way.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Zigrid 4/19/2025 9:15:54 AM (No. 1935627)
Ah...here comes the judge...here comes the judge...it's the democrats only game plan ...it seems...how's that working for ya....you look more foolish with each court order....and the final touch was the senator who used taxpayer's dollars to sip margaritas with a convicted jail bird...is this all they have.....and now the democrats are talking impeachment again....for what????... no one seems to make sense of it...maybe Allen Dershowitz from Harvard can explain it.....
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 4/19/2025 9:56:33 AM (No. 1935653)
The judges are trying to push the executive branch to the limit so they can get to President Trump. What they will finally do is incite a civil war.
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
rememberwhen 4/19/2025 12:01:13 PM (No. 1935762)
Just the latest phony-baloney excuse by a Dim judge to interfere with the Trump administration doing what the people elected them to do.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 4/19/2025 12:01:37 PM (No. 1935763)
Another Obama judge! Will we ever be rid of these corrupt lawless far Left judges?
God help us, our Constitution, our legal citizens, our country is our prayer.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 4/19/2025 4:44:11 PM (No. 1935882)
So, is it this Judge's spouse, sibling, parent, cousin or friend that is stealing from Social Security?
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)