Judge Indira Talwani Stops Trump Admin
from Ending Biden Amnesty that Was ‘Created
out of Thin Air’
Breitbart Politics,
by
Paul Bois
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
4/15/2025 10:26:50 AM
A federal judge stopped the Trump administration on Monday from ending deportation protections for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.
The individuals from said countries were reportedly granted entrance into the United States under the Biden presidency as part of a humanitarian parole program, per the Miami Herald. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani ruled, after a hearing last week, that the paroled migrants can stay in the United States as they pursue immigration benefits. In effect, her ruling will prevent the Department of Homeland Security’s secretary, Kristi Noem, from revoking their parole status as part of an administration plan to end the humanitarian program on April 24.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 4/15/2025 10:43:35 AM (No. 1932897)
Too bad this one didn't stay in India.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
franco 4/15/2025 10:58:32 AM (No. 1932902)
Ignore her and tell her and every other minor court judge the country that they do not have the authority to order the Executive Branch to do anything. (Per The Constitution, the Supreme Court alone arbitrates disputes with the Executive Branch.) This is the "Constitutional" solution. Anything less is condoning judicial tyranny. She can advise the plaintiffs to appeal to the next superior court.
16 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
chagrined 4/15/2025 11:16:56 AM (No. 1932921)
Yeah, I'm sure Roberts is going to fast track this through the SC to smack her down like she so richly deserves. The Bush gift that keeps on giving. . .
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/15/2025 11:23:34 AM (No. 1932929)
Remember she didn't say no. She simply ruled that they (500.000 of them) have to be dealt with on a case by case basis. So they stay here and keep drawing welfare for say next 33 years. This is exactly the excuse that Amy Barrett will use in siding with the three witches and CJ Roberts.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jinx 4/15/2025 12:11:39 PM (No. 1932961)
Did any rogue judges ever stop Biden from the dumb things he signed? No, I don't think so. They were in on the fix,
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/15/2025 12:40:41 PM (No. 1932981)
Bill Melugin of Fox News noted the Biden administration “created the program out of thin air” and the program “was temporarily halted due to fraud.”
“Biden admin created the program out of thin air using his executive parole authority, and it was temporarily halted due to fraud in the program, and this judge is now blocking Trump from using his own authority to cancel the humanitarian parole grants,” Melugin said on X.
This won't hold.
Indian parentage, born here. So much for anchor babies...
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
hershey 4/15/2025 1:30:26 PM (No. 1933020)
Trump just needs to stop this over reach by liberal stupid Federal judges ..he needs to prove they are not untouchable...
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
paral04 4/15/2025 1:53:49 PM (No. 1933040)
These judges have no jurisdiction. Immigration issues come under the Executive Branch and the head of that it our President. They should be forced to step down because of their lust for attempt to undermine a sitting President.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/15/2025 2:10:09 PM (No. 1933058)
Fine, President Trump needs to end all American aid, as they are not citizens.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/15/2025 2:36:47 PM (No. 1933080)
Karen Tumlin, Founder and Director of Justice Action Center, praised the ruling as a “significant step toward justice.”
OK. Now go and look up this organization. Judges don't cook this stuff up on their own.
1 person likes this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/15/2025 2:40:15 PM (No. 1933087)
Karen Tumlin (she/her/hers) is a nationally recognized impact litigator focusing on immigrants’ rights. She successfully litigated numerous cases of national significance, including a challenge to the Trump Administration’s effort to end the DACA program and the Muslim Ban, as well as the constitutional challenge to Arizona’s notorious anti-immigrant law, SB 1070. She formerly served as the Director of Legal Strategy and Legal Director for the National Immigration Law Center, where she built a legal department of over 15 staff who developed and led cases of national impact.
https://justiceactioncenter.org/team/
1 person likes this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 4/15/2025 3:01:28 PM (No. 1933103)
“Well, Indra, it looks like you done stepped on your Talwani in this one.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
oldmagnolia 4/15/2025 3:41:15 PM (No. 1933129)
Oh #1 but we can send her back. If she is a naturalized citizen, if she does anything against the Constitution or in detriment of the United States, she can lose her citizenship and we can kick her out.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MickTurn 4/15/2025 3:44:49 PM (No. 1933132)
Thanks for your ILLEGAL Ruling, now roll it up really tight and put it in yo Wazoo!
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bighambone 4/15/2025 6:26:38 PM (No. 1933218)
In accordance with the immigration laws aliens who are “paroled” into the USA have not been admitted to the USA and are to be treated as excludable aliens who are essentially still “knocking on the border door”. Their rights are therefore limited. Clearly Biden had no right to think up his own immigration law to misuse the intent of the parole provisions to allow hundreds of thousands of otherwise illegal aliens to gain entry into the USA. As the US Constitution prescribes that the immigration laws must be decided by Congress.
It has always been the law that such excludible aliens, who do not voluntarily withdraw any applications they have made for admission to the USA, with the US Government intending to turn them around and send them back to their home countries, always have been given a exclusion hearing before an immigration judge, and if the immigration judge finds them to be excludible aliens, they are then sent back to where they came from. Actually the district judge’s ruling calling for “due process” before an excludible alien is send back to their country of citizenship through US Government immigration enforcement action has already been happening, and there is a difference between Trump administratively terminating parole status for those excludible aliens through an executive order, and the US Government actually taking them into custody for removal (deportation).
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)