Trump threatens to veto bipartisan bill
mandating congressional approval of tariffs
New York Post,
by
Josh Christenson
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
4/8/2025 12:03:11 AM
WASHINGTON — The White House warned Monday that President Trump would veto a bipartisan bill that would mandate congressional approval of all tariffs should it arrive on his desk.
Trump’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) said the measure introduced last week by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) “would severely constrain the President’s ability to use authorities long recognized by Congress and upheld by the courts to respond to national emergencies and foreign threats.”
The Trade Review Act also “eliminates leverage over foreign trading partners, inhibits reshoring and supply chain resilience, fosters market uncertainty, and introduces procedural micromanagement,” the OMB Statement of Administration Policy added.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Proud Texan 4/8/2025 12:30:28 AM (No. 1928863)
He dang well better veto it!
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Ketchuplover 4/8/2025 1:07:09 AM (No. 1928865)
These elite at the Capitol were scared for their lives when unarmed patriots were invited in and entered their Parthenon of Perks on January 6 four years ago. Some have even cried telling us about it. Yet, it's okay for violent foreign terrorists to roam our streets, take over our buildings, rape our children - and hey -- "there's nothing to see here! Certainly no national emergency! Let US be the ones to determine a national emergency! Didn't we do well with the border the last four years?"
12 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/8/2025 1:17:11 AM (No. 1928867)
Republicans get to work, when it is to undermine Trump. When Trump needs something done --- that will take 6 months.
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 4/8/2025 1:21:38 AM (No. 1928870)
Yep, saw this coming from five miles away.
17 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 4/8/2025 5:36:06 AM (No. 1928921)
Time for Chuck to retire.
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
5 handicap 4/8/2025 5:50:53 AM (No. 1928928)
Grassley, the "Biden" of the US Congress, can't seem to get out of his own way... and who does he have a s a co-signer? Non other than the T R E A S O N O U S Mitch McConnell. These two senile asshats want to stifle the President, elected by a huge majority of the American People... GOD DAMN their evil America-hating souls to the Hell they so richly deserve!
20 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/8/2025 5:55:19 AM (No. 1928931)
Congress keeps trying to insert its big nose into the progress that we overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump to accomplish. Especially annoying are the Republicans who do not understand the meaning of "mandate." No, it's not a homosexual meeting for drinks and dinner.
16 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 4/8/2025 7:18:17 AM (No. 1928956)
Congress doesn't do their job so they want to meddle into the Executive branch's business. Congress, straighten up the district courts mess, pass a budget, and mind you own business. I'm an old geezer and it is time for the old geezers in Congress to retire or be fired. Quit reelecting incumbents just because their names are familiar.
19 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
sw penn 4/8/2025 8:13:00 AM (No. 1928986)
And if they get their "Trade Review Act"
they'll need a whole new bureaucracy
of idiot cousins to oversee it.
Slush funds for everyone!
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/8/2025 8:14:22 AM (No. 1928987)
As Don Vito told Michael "Watch for the one who brings the peace proposal, he is the traitor". We will know from this 'bipartisan' proposal.
8 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mobyclik 4/8/2025 8:26:55 AM (No. 1928994)
Great! Get Congress involved, they've been screwing things up for decades and insist on extending that record. Maybe they're afraid their, ahem, 'perks' might disappear.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
planetgeo 4/8/2025 8:38:07 AM (No. 1928999)
Republican Congress determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again. These clowns must have a lot of their own dough in companies temporarily in tariff trouble for their stock prices. And just when Trump's plan is starting to work and fundamentally restructure all our trade agreements to America's benefit.
11 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 4/8/2025 9:59:03 AM (No. 1929042)
Graslie, you old coot, might want to consider following the Turtlemeister out the door for pushing this bill in the first place.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Geoman 4/8/2025 10:17:56 PM (No. 1929412)
Although generally supportive of what Trump has outlined via his tariff policy, I'm with the U.S. Constitution on this one, as I've sworn an oath multiple times in my adult life to support it. The Framers, after much debate, rightly or wrongly as viewed through the lens of 2025, did not place the power to tax and spend in Article II, which enumerates Executive power and authority but rather vested such power exclusively in Congress, per the plain language of Article 1. Section 8, specifically includes the power to lay and collect duties and imposts - aka, tariffs. Congress passed legislation, delegating certain of their authorities to the president relative to tariffs but those authorities come with requirements - or terms and conditions - that must be met, so Congress still possesses the primary role in tariff matters, as Article 1 section 8 was never repealed or amended. Congress can rescind previously delegated authority by legislation and the president can certainly exercise his veto power, unless overridden by Congress. It does seem a bit unsettling to cheer the veto of any president against legislation that seeks to restore the primacy of clearly stated Constitutional authority, even if the president is more popular than the Constitution as written, ratified, and formally amended.
0 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
judy 4/9/2025 5:39:43 AM (No. 1929451)
Where was the concern when the tariffs were used
by foreign countries for yearssssss...when Trump want tariffs suddenly it's a a dirty word...
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)