Can We Stop this ‘Third Term’ Nonsense?
If Trump Wants to Be Great, He Needs to
Walk Away.
PJ Media,
by
Scott Pinsker
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
3/30/2025 12:17:01 PM
It’s not entirely clear if he was real or fictional. Most historians believe he was probably real, but it’s tricky to verify: The legend of Lucius Cincinnatus was (enthusiastically) retold in Titus “Livy” Livius’ book, the “History of Rome,” which was written a few decades before Christ. Unquestionably, Livius’ book included real, verifiable, historic events, but it also included the mythology of the Trojan War and tales of magical twins suckled by a she-wolf.
But the legend of Lucius Cincinnatus still endures. He’s even the namesake of an American city in southwest Ohio. And his story continues to influence kings, queens, emperors, and (yes) even U.S. presidents.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Lucky5 3/30/2025 12:28:26 PM (No. 1923621)
This is not his idea. It is people who wish he could do that. It scares the heck out of the left but I think we have enough of that going on already. I find it something I would prefer not to argue with my anti-trump mother about. She is so far sure Musk is really running the country and going to take away her SS and Medicare. Now she will think Trump really is going to be the dictator she already thinks he is...
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JayD 3/30/2025 12:28:41 PM (No. 1923622)
President Trump says things like this to tweak the twinks. Like you. Same with the 51st state thing about Canada. Chill out, stop being a twink and have a laugh at all the twinks that still panic over it.
18 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
thekidsmom66 3/30/2025 12:29:32 PM (No. 1923624)
Trump is not planning a 3rd term. Good grief. People are too easily manipulated by the left's talking points.
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jalo1951 3/30/2025 12:35:39 PM (No. 1923631)
Made up nonsense from the left because they have nothing else to talk about. One more lie to rile up the populace. It would take 38 states to pass to amend the constitution. That's not going to happen. And most everyone does not want it to happen, at least not for this reason. He would be too old and probably out of office anyway. Two terms is enough. If anything is done about serving let's term limit Congress Critters. They are hanging around way too long. A lot of offices are term limited. Funny how Congress isn't. But with DOGE drying up most of their kickback money that might change. No more showing up for Congress a normal working person and leaving a multi-millionaire $$$.
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 3/30/2025 12:36:01 PM (No. 1923632)
Give Me A Break!
Trump is having great fun and the fact that 40% of people, the LOONY LEFT, are terrified is GREAT!
In the end, Trump WILL walk away and laugh at their insanity.
Further, the Left is terrified of everything Trump is doing. They CHOOSE to revel in their phobias (intense, IRRATIONAL, and persistent fears of a specific object, situation, or activity).
Trump should not gate his behavior based on the eccentricities of the Left. We have spent far too much time doing that already.
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
spacer 3/30/2025 12:41:03 PM (No. 1923635)
Bath house barrys third term didn't work out very well.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 3/30/2025 12:42:42 PM (No. 1923637)
If people talk about Trump running for four terms, inevitably there will be talking about four terms for Obama or Biden. Perhaps we will have our first undead President. Double edged sword. Hey! Let's elect Presidents for life! Be careful what you wish for. It might actually happen. Our government has been setting so many bad precedents over the last few decades. It's a slippery slope.
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
snakeoil 3/30/2025 12:47:26 PM (No. 1923644)
President Trump has already been elected POTUS 3 times. I think Trump's children should run. I won't be around to see it but the weeping and moaning from the dims would be delicious.
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Venturer 3/30/2025 12:56:48 PM (No. 1923649)
Poster 8 is right about Trump winning the presidency 3 times, but I am not in favor of any of his kids running .
Maybe in 15 or 20 years if Barron fills out his potential, but not any time soon.
Trump has no intention of running another time, some damned fool thought that sh** up.
I know a lady a Democrat that voted for Trump because the Democrats were just so bad she could not vote for Biden, and yet she too is convinced that Musk will take her Social security. She just cannot leave those lying Democrats and their lying alone.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franco 3/30/2025 1:17:27 PM (No. 1923662)
I'm with most of the L-dotters here in thinking this is just PDJT trolling the left. Best I can tell, Steve Bannon first floated this idea and has stuck with it. Problem is, an originalist interpretation of the amendment would clearly state that two terms and done is it. Not only that, but every president since that amendment has governed with the *understanding* that two terms is the limit, and that's a lot of precedent to overturn. Any such attempt to run for 3rd term would be litigated to the USSC, and there we could expect a 9-0 decision against it.
Furthermore, there is another provision in The Constitution that Mr. Pinsker is missing: The people who are in the "order of succession" for the presidency -- whether elected (as in VP, Speaker of the House, and Senate Pro-Tem) or appointed (Sec'y of State) -- must all be eligible under The Constitution to serve as President. So someone who has already been president for two terms *can't* run for the office of VP. This is QED, but seemingly not for people who don't actually read The Constitution.
Finally, I take issue with Mr. Pinsker's understanding of the history of the 22nd amendment. This is a "minority" interpretation of the history (and I'm not young, but I wasn't around in '51), but here goes: The 22nd amendment was put on the books precisely to *prevent* Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, from being able to repeat FDR's success of having multiple presidential terms. At the time of the adoption of that amendment, Democrats knew that Ike would win big in '52 and probably again in '56 (and they were right about that)... and they wanted to make sure the streak didn't continue indefinitely. So even though the amendment was birthed in a Republican-controlled Congress in 1947, Democrats did nothing to prevent it from being adopted as they saw political advantage in it. It isn't clear that Ike would have beaten Kennedy in '60, but how different history might have been if he had... and there's good reason to believe that Ike would have remained president in '64, '68 and up till his death in 1969. After that, we'd have gotten Nixon without any scandal because the execrable LBJ would never have been able to install that tape recorder in the Oval Office...
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
kdog 3/30/2025 1:18:44 PM (No. 1923663)
All the BS going on with the left, lawfare, the EU and Ukraine warmongers, tranny power and domestic terrorism and Scott chooses this nonsense to write about.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
earlybird 3/30/2025 1:21:49 PM (No. 1923664)
WTH is Scott Pinsker and why is he all red in the face about something so unlikely to happen? How about sticking with the "now"?
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
franco 3/30/2025 1:26:11 PM (No. 1923665)
Addendum to #9: Some might notice that Henry Kissinger (native of Germany) and Madeleine Albright (native of some eastern European country) were not eligible to be president. This is true, and if one looks back at the handling of those appointments at the time, it seems the Senate was aware of this and gave its consent conditioned on the fact that those two were *not* in the order of succession, and in the improbable situation where the secretary of state needed to be elevated, the next person in the order of succession would, instead, become president.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
earlybird 3/30/2025 1:28:45 PM (No. 1923668)
Scott Pinsker is a Public Relations, Branding, and Crisis Communications Expert in Tampa Bay, Florida.
Why on earth is he at PJ Media? It is going off the rails from what it used to be.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
BarryNo 3/30/2025 5:45:07 PM (No. 1923775)
It's called trolling.
Trump is good at it, and the liberals are so hysterical they can't help but melt into greasy little pools of Swamp scum when they imagine it.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Miceal 3/30/2025 6:18:40 PM (No. 1923785)
This is having the desired effect...
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
FormerDem 3/30/2025 6:42:11 PM (No. 1923798)
I think he has no intention of being treated as a lame duck, which he would be. There is no knowing what he will do, except for 100% sure he will not put himself in a bad negotiating position. Summing up: let it go.
1 person likes this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 3/31/2025 6:27:47 AM (No. 1924011)
Didn't FDR serve twelve years? If true, Democrats didn't seem to have a problem with that. . .
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
homefry 3/31/2025 7:45:48 AM (No. 1924052)
He is just jerking their chain.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)