Signalgate: President Trump Stands by
Mike Waltz – Attributing Signal App
Issue to Waltz Staffer Who Accidentally
Added Journalist
Conservative Treehouse,
by
Sundance
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
3/25/2025 11:35:03 PM
President Trump has given remarks supporting National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during an interview with NBC.(snipa) asked what he was told about how Goldberg came to be added to the Signal chat, Trump said, “It was one of Michael’s people on the phone. A staffer had his number on there.”
snip)
The rest of the DC setup is transparently clear. (1) Goldberg held the story until the day before a long-scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (2) The SSCI then used the hearing to blast the heads of the Trump administration intelligence silos on the issue of “classified” information
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
earlybird 3/25/2025 11:37:22 PM (No. 1921329)
And an aide has had to explain why he/she had Goldberg's number on their phone....
37 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 3/25/2025 11:40:04 PM (No. 1921331)
The Presidednt was talking to NBC. The Enemedia.
11 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
stablemoney 3/25/2025 11:53:08 PM (No. 1921336)
I don't believe the addition of the journalist was accidental.
48 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
planetgeo 3/25/2025 11:59:16 PM (No. 1921339)
#1, the good news about this minor but embarrassing mistake is that apparently a staff member has accidentally exposed himself as a l probable eak source. Nice. One down and a few hundred more to find
And my advice to these intelligence official when they are being hypocritically grilled by the Democrats is to ask them where their awesome demands for accountability were when Biden and Mayorkas were flooding the country with criminals and terrorists. Talk about national security breaches.
38 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
NeverVoteDem 3/26/2025 12:44:31 AM (No. 1921351)
A donkey's tempest in a teapot.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
felixcat 3/26/2025 5:01:16 AM (No. 1921363)
I saw his interview on Laura Ingraham last night - I don't know, but he was talking a lot of babble. For crying out loud, in this day and age, why anything sensitive is being discussed on any electronic device, network, app, etc is beyond me.
19 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
planetgeo 3/26/2025 5:44:32 AM (No. 1921367)
My suggestion for "correcting" this situation is to contract the Israelis to hand out 2 free pagers to all the "journalists" like Goldberg who love to ambush Trump and his team... One pager for the journo and one that the journo can give to his secret leak source so they can both get in touch quickly. They should get a bang out of it
17 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
5 handicap 3/26/2025 5:45:45 AM (No. 1921368)
I am with #3... There is no way anyone smart enough to beworking for that group of people would allow a Journalist anywhere near the aforementioned group! Hell the very "name" Journalist declassifies gthe entire enterprise; ergo, it was done for some nefarious purpose!
16 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Heraclitus 3/26/2025 6:00:16 AM (No. 1921369)
Deftly put, #5!
Might be useful to subpoena the “Atlantic” Trump-hater, whose mission has been, and is, to destroy DJT, and by extension, the USA.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/26/2025 7:35:29 AM (No. 1921401)
What have we learned from this? Trump's people messed up by including and them not realizing that Goldberg was included in the group chat. It also shows that Goldberg is a liberal hack journalist who will do whatever he can to make the Trump administration look bad. There is no need to share the texts. Just because you can, doesn't mean that you should.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mamabear 3/26/2025 8:12:27 AM (No. 1921414)
If memory serves me correctly, in his interview with Tim Miller, Goldberg referred to the involvement of an undercover CIA agent. Is there a fox in the hen house?
5 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
czechlist 3/26/2025 8:14:44 AM (No. 1921416)
This is just the kind of ongoing distraction from the agenda the dims and theur media want
Don't let them use it. Fire Walz and his staff and move on
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
marbles 3/26/2025 8:25:18 AM (No. 1921419)
The MSM is so desperately trying to make this into the crime of the century. Never saw so much hand wringing and pearl clutching.
7 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Venturer 3/26/2025 8:32:19 AM (No. 1921426)
It wasn't right, but the Democraps want to make a big deal of it.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Zigrid 3/26/2025 9:41:25 AM (No. 1921468)
Something is rotten with this whole story...WE need to find out what really happened.....
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
janjan 3/26/2025 10:23:15 AM (No. 1921489)
This was no accident. It is my understanding that nothing classified was discussed. Goldberg of course rushed out to claim there was but he’s lying. It was a sweet opportunity for the Democrats to haul half of Trump’s Cabinet into Congress and rough them up with faux outrage, conveniently forgetting that they willfully let a dementia patient pretend to run the country for 4 years. Find out who did it and ruin them. This will soon pass.
8 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bighambone 3/26/2025 10:30:06 AM (No. 1921492)
Apparently the attacks were effectively over at the time the digital group chat took place. By the time Goldberg released the unclassified information that he said he gleaned from the chat no doubt the Houthis knew that they had been attacked and what targets had been hit and destroyed. Chances are the staffer at the NSC who put Goldberg’s telephone number on the group chat list was a anti-Trump Democrat who had facilitated previous contacts with Goldberg during the Biden Administration, as Goldberg is a far left media actor who was 101% in support of the Biden Administration’s progressive Democrat political agenda, so it is very doubtful that any Trump supporting Republican would have had Goldberg’s confidential phone number. You have to figure that since Elon Musk’s digital crew is looking into what happened that they will find out all the digital aspects of what really happened to create this incident. Also it appears that it was during the Biden Administration that the Signal ap. was placed in service as a government communication method, that now no doubt will be removed.
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
moebellini3 3/26/2025 11:13:00 AM (No. 1921516)
Trump knows better and he will take care of this problem.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Strike3 3/26/2025 12:00:42 PM (No. 1921545)
I can put out the same message to the entire world without revealing anything that everybody already doesn't know. "If the Houthis attack shipping lanes in the Red Sea or the Arabian Sea again, their weapons caches will be bombed and people will be killed." Big secret, right?
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
athina 3/26/2025 12:32:02 PM (No. 1921564)
Next time use a secure zoom - like session w a camera. How can you trust who is on the other end of a text?
Why did the staffer have goldberg’s #? Who did he/she think he was adding if not goldberg?
Need more questions answered. This doesn’t sound like a mistake to me.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
danu 3/26/2025 12:44:08 PM (No. 1921571)
fwiw, per the gossip we got: seems this app was pre-installed, and put in use, by the joebama junta.
as such, names from a big dem party organ like the atlantic could have been listed for years.
over time, names or numbers may change, or may not be clearly identifiable, or may not get purged.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
jasmine 3/26/2025 9:42:18 PM (No. 1921805)
Mr. Goldberg proudly notes "I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming."
I don't understand what made Mr. Goldberg remain with the group, knowing his inclusion was unlikely to have been legitimate. He was only listed a "JG" rather than with his name, which would have raised alarm bells, given his reputation and partisanship. Surely he understood he was included by mistake, but he exploited our national interest by choosing to remain in the chat. He reminds me of someone who finds a bank has credited his account with funds that belong to someone else, but keeps his mouth shut hoping he can collect on the mistake at a later date. He's no better than the folks collecting Social Security checks to which they're not entitled. The proper thing to do would be to acknowledge the mistake and move on. That's what a person with integrity would have done. But that's not what happened.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)